similar to: which ftpd for public ftp server?

The instructions in RHSA-2000:037-01 (2.2.16 kernel update) tell you: 4. Solution: For each RPM for your particular architecture, run: rpm -Fvh [filename] where filename is the name of the RPM. These instructions are incomplete and may result in a system that is unbootable. After updating the RPM files, you should also: (1) run mkinitrd to create a new initial ramdisk image

Hello, I see in BugTraq that there's yet another problem with Wu-ftpd, but I see no mention of it in the freebsd-security mailing list archives...I have searched the indexes from all of June and July. Wu is pretty widely used, so I'm surprised that nobody seems to have mentioned this problem in this forum. The notice on BugTraq mentioned only Linux, not FreeBSD, but that's no

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-99:03 Security Advisory FreeBSD, Inc. Topic: Three ftp daemons in ports vulnerable to attack. Category: ports Module: wu-ftpd and proftpd

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Security Advisory Synopsis: Security problems in WU-FTPD Advisory ID: RHSA-1999:043-01 Issue date: 1999-10-21 Updated on: Keywords: wu-ftp security remote exploit Cross references: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Topic: Various computer security groups have

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-08:12.ftpd Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Cross-site request forgery in ftpd(8) Category: core Module: ftpd Announced:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ______________________________________________________________________________ Caldera Systems, Inc. Security Advisory Subject: wu-ftpd vulnerability Advisory number: CSSA-2000-020.0 Issue date: 2000 June, 23 Cross reference: ______________________________________________________________________________ 1. Problem Description There is

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.34 Severity: normal the patterns for pure-ftpd in ignore.d.server are not matching a user with a trailing whitespace. here a some examples: Feb 18 13:02:33 web1 pure-ftpd: (stupid-pure-ftpd @84.56.131.73) [NOTICE] /example/example.txt downloaded (5908 bytes, 152196.03KB/sec) Feb 18 13:16:14 web1 pure-ftpd: (stupid-pure-ftpd @84.56.131.73) [INFO] Logout. every

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.69 Severity: normal In the file /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/wu-ftpd ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ wu-ftpd: PAM-listfile: Refused user [._[:alnum:]-]+ for service wu-ftpd$ should be ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ wu-ftpd\[[0-9]{4}\]: PAM-listfile: Refused user [._[:alnum:]-]+ for service wu-ftpd$ There is a number after "wu-ftpd" -- System

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-01:33 Security Advisory FreeBSD, Inc. Topic: globbing vulnerability in ftpd Category: core Module: ftpd/libc Announced: 2001-04-17 Credits:

You could use ktrace(1) to determine what the ftpd daemon is actually doing. rh> Is the user's shell listed in /etc/shells? It must be there for ftpd to rh> let them in. vt> I run FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE machine. I use ftpd for ftp server daemon. It has vt> very strange behavior with one of user accounts on my machine. Every one user

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 20:30:27 -0700 (PDT) From: David Cantrell <david@slackware.com> To: slackware-security@slackware.com Subject: CA-99-13: wu-ftpd upgrade available ATTENTION: All users of Slackware 4.0 and Slackware-current REGARDING: CERT Advisory CA-99-13 Multiple Vulnerabilities in WU-FTPD The recent CERT advisory reporting multiple

The subject pretty much says it all. My ftp comes back with "ftp: ftp/tcp: unknown service" - unless I run it as root, in which case it works just fine. What's going on here? Did I screw up a setting of mine or something? Thanks. mhr -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Ran into a weird problem, and this seemed a good forum to toss it out into -- if I've gaffed, please let me know. Just upgraded my RH5.0 box to RH5.2. Went well, worked nearly seamlessly. When running 5.0, though, I'd installed the opie-fied ftpd that comes with the most recent opie package (ftp://ftp.inner.net/pub/opie/opie-2.32.tar.gz) and had it work without a hitch. I'd also

Hi, anyone successfully compiled http://download.pureftpd.org/pub/pure-ftpd/snapshots/pure-ftpd-1.0.22.tar.bz2 Thanks, David

Hi! I'm kind new to linux, I just got my server with CentOS 3.1 installed I'm trying to install a ftp server to upload files, but the wu-ftpd 2.6.2 doesn't work with autoconfigure nor with ./build lnx ./build install got error missing bin/ftpd can you tell me step by step howto install o should I user another ftp server... thanks for your help Fernando

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-99:03 Security Advisory FreeBSD, Inc. Topic: Two ftp daemons in ports vulnerable to attack. Category: ports Module: wu-ftpd and proftpd

I did try that, but had difficulties in compiling it from source-- it's not in the yum repositories (either CentOS or Dag Wieers). -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator, Chapman University 714.628.7249 / chandler at chapman.edu Ethernet, n. What one uses to catch the Etherbunny. -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of

Thank you very much. I had turned firewall OFF and it is working. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Greg Knaddison" <greg.knaddison at gmail.com> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 4:17 PM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] FTP timout > > > On 8/24/05, Abd El-Hameed Ayad <hamid at

I have taken over a number of RH/FC/CentOS servers recently. I am trying to upgrade all of them to CentOS 4.3 and configure them to only use software that can be managed via yum/apt repositories. One of the choices made by my predecessor was the pure-ftpd server over vsftpd. I cannot find a repo to get this rpm from and am wondering if anyone on the list has any practical experience with both and

Hello, I'm running pure-ftpd 1.21-16 on centos 5.3. A user sent me some files, some rpms and a few patch files. The rpms do not show up right, they record as data rather than rpm or tar or zip or whatever. I am not certain if it's pure-ftpd corrupting these files, the patches showed up empty and i was assured everything was working on the other end, or if the user uploaded binary files in