similar to: [RHSA-2000:045-01] gpm security flaws have been addressed

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ________________________________________________________________________ Linux-Mandrake Security Update Advisory ________________________________________________________________________ Package name: gpm Date: July 27th, 2000 Advisory ID: MDKSA-2000:025 Affected versions: 6.0, 6.1, 7.0, 7.1

Attention all List Members: We are in the process of migrating all Red Hat lists from the current list manager software/server running qmail/Smartlist to a new server running postfix and GNU Mailman (*). Within the next week you will receive more information about this migration including information on how to access your membership, including subscribe/unsubscribe information and instructions on

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- - --------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Security Advisory Synopsis: gpm Advisory ID: RHSA-2000:009-02 Issue date: 2000-04-07 Updated on: 2000-04-10 Product: Red Hat Linux Keywords: gpm gpm-root gid 0 priviledge Cross references: N/A -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ______________________________________________________________________________ Caldera Systems, Inc. Security Advisory Subject: DoS on gpm Advisory number: CSSA-2000-024.0 Issue date: 2000 July, 6 Cross reference: ______________________________________________________________________________ 1. Problem Description There are security

GPM Modula-2 and Oberon-2 Compilers File locations: ftp.fit.qut.edu.au:/pub/gpm ftp.psg.com:/pub/modula-2/gpm WEB Site: http://www.fit.qut.edu.au/CompSci/PLAS/GPM/ The Gardens Point Modula (GPM) compilers are an ongoing development project for the Programming Languages and Systems Group in the Faculty of Information Technology at the Queensland University of Technology.

windows systems and I can see the SAMBA server in my workgroup inside the network neighborhood. When I double click on the server nothing happens for about 5 seconds and then I get a pop up error (text of error is): -------- \\Sambaserver is not accessible Windows cannot find the computer or share name. Make sure the computer or share name is valid and that you are connected to the network,

Hi! I want to get down to the root cause of the issue I am having with my new DC in my domain. I have followed some tutorials on the internet and basically do not get the results. I have 1 old DC, that is providing the AD domain for the whole local network. I wanted to add another one. Both are Ubuntus 16.04, fully updated. I have followed this

Well, last night, my box was hit again.. same symptoms: All attempts to connect remotely receive a connection, but a login prompt never comes up. When I went to the console and turned on the monitor, I had the login prompt, but written on to the screen was the message IPMASQ: Reverse ICMP: Checksum error from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx So, on this occasion, I thought I would post a summary of the

OK, I've deleted everything what Rowland suggested. THANKS Now smb.conf looks like this [global] workgroup = GPMV realm = BIURO.domain netbios name = PDC server role = active directory domain controller dns forwarder = 192.168.0.252 max open files = 57000 full_audit:prefix = %u|%I|%m|%S full_audit:success = mkdir rename unlink rmdir pwrite full_audit:failure = none full_audit:facility =

Rowland, thanks for answering 2017-04-23 12:21 GMT+02:00 Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 11:40:45 +0200 > Jakub Kulesza <jakkul+samba at gmail.com> wrote: > > > OK, I've deleted everything what Rowland suggested. THANKS > > > > Now smb.conf looks like this > > > > [netlogon] > > path =

Greetings. I wrote a script that make remote backups with rsync. I have 2 main problems with it 1) I want that the destination directory (on the repository machine) recreate the backed up file path and it permission (I use -R here ) 2) Is there a way to "follow" all the links using -R and -a parameters..?? Currently I am using something like this. rsync -al --delete

Hi all, Just another GPO Permissions question. I'm trying to track down why some GPOs are essentially invisible to the clients, even though they exist in GPM and the files exist. So, they aren't being applied or denied. What's the current wisdom on GPO ownership? In GPM, the applicable object is "owned" by Domain Admins, but the \\DC\sysvol\SAMDOM\Policies\{UUID} should

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Security Advisory Synopsis: Updated PAM packages are available. Advisory ID: RHSA-2000:044-02 Issue date: 2000-07-21 Updated on: 2000-07-21 Product: Red Hat Linux Keywords: N/A Cross references: N/A

I did stop it. And everything went back to life. I wonder why it did work this way on 14.04... 37 years on the clock and life still surprises me :) Thanks guys, issue looks solved. If anyone's in Warsaw/PL, beer's on me. 2017-04-23 13:50 GMT+02:00 Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 13:37:25 +0200 > Jakub Kulesza <jakkul+samba at gmail.com>

yes, I tried working with samba wiki and quad-verifying what is recommended to be checked. OK, I'll try to join using 18.04. the samba_dnsupdate tool does not have the --use-samba-tool option in ubuntu 16.04 2018-04-25 22:47 GMT+02:00 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 22:32:10 +0200 > Jakub Kulesza <jakkul+samba at gmail.com> wrote:

On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 22:32:10 +0200 Jakub Kulesza <jakkul+samba at gmail.com> wrote: > Rowland, thank you for answering! > > I have investigated this a bit, and I think that using 18.04 for the > new DC will not be successful anyway. Reasons: the AD I have has been > created back in the days when 14.04 LTS was fresh. The provisioning > scripts worked differently. 14.04 has

I’m not sure if it will help you but we’re seeing something similar that I call the “10 hours problem” here. On any Samba - after 4.7.6 (we’re currently trying out 4.9.4 but still no go) - at 10 hours after it (smbd & winbindd) was restarted it new connections often (but not 100% all the time, but we think it is related to the number of connections, or active connections, or how many are

Rowland, thank you for answering! I have investigated this a bit, and I think that using 18.04 for the new DC will not be successful anyway. Reasons: the AD I have has been created back in the days when 14.04 LTS was fresh. The provisioning scripts worked differently. 14.04 has been upgraded to 16.04, and I think that I do not have all of the DNSes configured properly and this might be the cause

Hi, I am using rsync to backup various machines to a central server (all archlinux, rsync 3.0.7 on ext4). Yesterday I needed one of those backups, and I found out it is useless since a lot of files never got updated. Even when I enable checksums some files are not updated. I am pretty sure I am missing something, but am not sure what it is. This is (a stripped version of) the command I use:

Here we go again: Hi all. Most of you already know about my problems (well, my computer?s problems ;-) ), since we?ve been discussing on the forum. Hughesjr recommended me to post here, so let?s see, I have my faith on you I have a dedicated server with RH9 that I upgraded to CentOS 3.4 . Everything ok, but after the first yum upgrade and reboot I get this when I try to do a yum update: