similar to: [RHSA-2001:129-10] New kernel 2.4 packages are available

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Red Hat Security Advisory Synopsis: New kernel 2.4 packages are available Advisory ID: RHSA-2001:129-05 Issue date: 2001-10-09 Updated on: 2001-10-18 Product: Red Hat Linux Keywords: ptrace local root kernel Cross references: Obsoletes:

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Red Hat Security Advisory Synopsis: kernel 2.2 and 2.4: syncookie vulnerability Advisory ID: RHSA-2001:142-15 Issue date: 2001-10-26 Updated on: 2001-11-02 Product: Red Hat Linux Keywords: syncookie security kernel Cross references: Obsoletes:

Hello, I search through but I didn't find a clear answer about it. I have a rh 6.2 based box where I made many steps of upgrades. Some of them, not being available the binary rpm glibc 2.1 based, I obtained using src.rpm from rh 7.2 and then runnig #rpm --rebuild package.src.rpm and then installing the generated binary: great sw rpm!!! My rpm version is 4.0.2-6x for both rpm, rpm-devel,

Hi I am happy to share a "proof of concept" for a centos-3.3 (not yet 3.4 ready) x86 and x86_64 distributions running either 2.4 and 2.6 linux kernels. This is not an official statement of the CentOS team! <include std disclaimer> don't complain if this howto eats your machine ;) It works for me and the src.rpm are provided. </include> <blurb> In order to have a

Kernel 2.4.8 on an Athlon 500. e2fsprogs-1.23 ext3 compiled as a module. I used "tune2fs" to make /boot and /home into ext3, and remounted them OK. (I am so amazed to see the system come right back without an lengthy fsck on these two file systems after a power off! Well done!) I also used "tune2fs -j" on /, it created a /.journal file. The debugfs features command shows

New EXT3 Packages have been uploaded to ftp.beta.redhat.com today. We have expanded the packages offering by popular request :-) You may download these packages via anonymous ftp, or via the web page at http://www.beta.redhat.com/. BUGS Bugs against these packages should still be posted at bugzilla.redhat.com Product: Red Hat High Availability Server Version: beta Component: ext3

it's strange since this kernel don't have kvm support, qemu or qemu-kvm or kvm package is not added. even though it was said that 5.4 will support kvm?:-( Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > New Packages in RHEL 5.4 Beta: > ******************************** > blktrace-1.0.0-6.el5.src.rpm > celt051-0.5.1.3-0.el5.src.rpm > etherboot-5.4.4-10.el5.src.rpm >

Hey Stephen or Ted, Since ext3 is incorporated in linux-2.4.15-pre3 do you think we should update the Documentation/Changes since so many people had troubles with e2fsprog-2.1.19 and ext3 ? I couldn't see any RPM's after 2.1.19 so I removed RPM from the Changes file. Albert --- linux/Documentation/Changes.orig Sun Nov 11 22:17:34 2001 +++ linux/Documentation/Changes Sun Nov 11 22:21:07

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Red Hat Security Advisory Synopsis: New sendmail packages available which fix a local root exploit Advisory ID: RHSA-2001:106-06 Issue date: 2001-08-28 Updated on: 2001-09-06 Product: Red Hat Linux Keywords: sendmail local root input validation

I was able to successfully migrate from 4.4 to 5.0 in place. I created a guide for our webhost and thought to share it with the community in general. I registered as JasonPotkanski on the wiki. As a side note, if spam on the CentOS wiki is terrible, perhaps use of Bad Behavior may be used. -Jason Potkanski Citizendium ---- All right, Here is an unholy guide for Migrating Centos 4.4 to 5.0

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2005:xxx This is 'rest of the U1 level updates'. Notable still missing anaconda, but everything else should be there now. The file list below does contain some previously updated files as it's the list of _all_ updated files. The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: files:

i noticed that the 4.4 upgrade broke LILO on Raid... it gave errors on partitions not on the primary disk along the lines of "/dev/dis: no such device"... even explicitly installing the boot sector on each device in the array, while it allowed the system to boot, gave errors at boot time and did not display the CentOS boot screen anymore... i solved the problem by creating a

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Just fired up a test machine on its first 2.4 kernel - specifically 2.4.9-ac16 (includes ext3 0.9.6). Had also upgraded e2fs tool set to 1.23. This box has previously had 2.2 kernels with Stephen's ext3 patches, and looks like it was last rebuilt from scratch in early March. I suspect it may have an old version 1 format journal on the filesystems. [Unfortunately I managed to destroy the

Greetings all, I'm trying to create a CentOS 4.4 kickstart CD (not a network install), duplicating what I've done for Fedora Core 3. I am having a cirular dependency for initscripts, which causes initscripts not to be installed (no /etc/inittab when the boot gets to INIT) The cascade is: initscripts-7.39.25.EL-1.centos4 requires /sbin/nash /sbin/nash is in mkinitrd-4.2.1.8-1

Hi, just some script built along: Unattended install & run CentOS-4.1 just using chroot(1). Mostly a surprise for me it was so easy to reach that goal. It requires rpm(1) based host OS and it was tested only on Fedora Core 4. I needed it to do only a bit customized CentOS kernel package rebuild. Regards, Lace -------------- next part -------------- #! /bin/bash # Bootstrap for: CentOS-4.1

Here we go again: Hi all. Most of you already know about my problems (well, my computer?s problems ;-) ), since we?ve been discussing on the forum. Hughesjr recommended me to post here, so let?s see, I have my faith on you I have a dedicated server with RH9 that I upgraded to CentOS 3.4 . Everything ok, but after the first yum upgrade and reboot I get this when I try to do a yum update:

Hello, does anybody know if there is an ext3fs patch for kernel 2.4.2-2 that is shipped with redhat 7.1? I was abel to fins patches only for 2.4.6 and 2.4.7. Please try to help ASAP. Best regards, Imad Ossaily.

Hello all, I was upgrading a CentOS 5.1 box to 5.2 remotely, and I lost my ssh connection to the server. Now when I rerun the "yum upgrade" it fails due to conflicts in the transaction check stage. Before I dig myself a deeper hole, I think I need advice. The original error I received was a conflict between python-devel and python, so I erased python-devel with the plan to

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When