similar to: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-06:08.sack

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-06:08.sack Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Infinite loop in SACK handling Category: core Module: netinet Announced:

All, Recently on an Ultra 10 running Solaris 8: -- SunOS toasty 5.8 Generic_108528-20 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10, -- using a pre-compiled package of rsync 2.5.6 from sunfreeware.com: -- bash-2.03$ rsync --version rsync version 2.5.6 protocol version 26 Copyright (C) 1996-2002 by Andrew Tridgell and others <http://rsync.samba.org/> Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard links,

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=464 ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2006-07-15 18:38 MET ------- Jurgen: you are behind a box which doesn't understand the SACK option. From your trace: 02:52:32.237095 IP 134.76.88.65.11064 > 84.132.150.225.32805: P 237274514:237275954(1440) ack 372631662 win 181 <nop,nop,timestamp 229942196

--7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Netfilter Core Team Security Advisory =20 CVE: CAN-2003-0467 Subject: Netfilter / NAT Remote DoS Released: 01 Aug 2003 Effects: Under limited circumstances, a remote user may be able to crash

Hi ! I''ve a router linux with 3 eths in order to share internet connection: 1:lo 2:eth0-> Internet Connection (DHCP) 3:eth1-> gateway wired hosts -> 192.168.101.254 4:eth2-> gateway wireless hosts -> 192.168.212.254 / 192.168.230.254 / 192.168.210.254 / ... eth2 haves diferents IP Aliasings because it connect to a switch which connect 4 access points (linksys), each

Am 07.01.2016 um 11:58 schrieb Sébastien Le Ray: > Hi list (and happy new year), > > I'm experiencing some troubles using Samba (4.1.17 debian version) over > VPN. Basically we've following setup : > > PC === LAN ===> VPN (WAN) ==== LAN ===> Samba file Server > > Copying big (say > 1MiB) files from PC to Samba file server almost > always ends up with a

Le 07/01/2016 12:22, Reindl Harald a écrit : > > /usr/sbin/ifconfig eth0 txqueuelen 100 > ______________________________________________ > > ifcfg-eth0: > > ETHTOOL_OPTS="-K ${DEVICE} tso on lro off; -G ${DEVICE} rx 128 tx 128" > ______________________________________________ > > sysctl.conf: > > net.core.rmem_max = 65536 > net.core.wmem_max = 65536

Hi all: I have some kvm host(rhel 6.4, 2.6.32-358.0.1.el6.x86_64), I ran several windows guest on it(more than 10 guest on one host and the guest os are win7-32/win7-64/win2k8), but the guest network kept down automatically, lost package. I tried virtio drive and e1000 drive,but it didn't work. However, when I run cmd.exe ping some other subnet ip it worked. The host and guest are connected by

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0433 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0433.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: b22e4c71d5658a4a8d06865e3d21050b lvm2-2.02.56-8.el5_5.4.i386.rpm Source: 2ef1a96433fb68c5b424f162a6a9a9e0 lvm2-2.02.56-8.el5_5.4.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0433 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0433.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: e9b8bf3f11f58535fe73852019d64108 lvm2-2.02.56-8.el5_5.4.x86_64.rpm Source: 2ef1a96433fb68c5b424f162a6a9a9e0 lvm2-2.02.56-8.el5_5.4.src.rpm -- Karanbir

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0433 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0433.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 45c76896ff499b32f333a060a54df5aa xorg-x11-server-utils-7.1-5.el5_6.1.i386.rpm Source: 2bbeca5e3144426576c2d042fb181a42

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0433 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0433.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 45c996befc8502b504eaa002fdacf972 xorg-x11-server-utils-7.1-5.el5_6.1.x86_64.rpm Source: 2bbeca5e3144426576c2d042fb181a42

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0433 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0433.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 57e573cb29b42ae5e997c57fcd6158037ff8ff855892fc49f3ca52285ce7432c kernel-2.6.18-371.8.1.el5.i686.rpm

Hi list (and happy new year), I'm experiencing some troubles using Samba (4.1.17 debian version) over VPN. Basically we've following setup : PC === LAN ===> VPN (WAN) ==== LAN ===> Samba file Server Copying big (say > 1MiB) files from PC to Samba file server almost always ends up with a NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT error (or "a network error occured" if trying to copy from

Hi folks, I have the following in my firewall (condensed version) [CentOS 4.2: 2.6.9-11.EL.i686 kernel]: INPUT: --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT -p tcp -j REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset -j REJECT OUTPUT: ACCEPT The connection is over a wireless link so packets _do_ get dropped even though throughput is around 100-400 kB/s (depending on atmospheric conditions, etc.) Now I've noticed

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=443 ------- Additional Comments From nothingel@hotmail.com 2006-03-17 20:07 MET ------- sorry for the delay...I'll check this out hopefully first of next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug,

Hello! Hardver: Windows XP Compaq Proliant DL360, Linux Compaq Proliant DL380. 2 pieces of processors Intel Xeon 3,2GHz, 2GB RAM, 6 gigabit interface (2 tg3, 4 e1000), Debian Woody, 2.4.31 vanilla kernel. 6 U320 SCSI 15krpm HDD, 2 HDD RAID1 system, 4 HDD RAID1+0 data. Every network cards connect at speed of 1000MB full duplex, with XP crosscable (but we've tried with gigabit switch, too, we

I was comparing some traces from SCP and SFTP when transferring the same file 200MB file between the same host pairs. Even when I put SFTP in batch mode I noticed that I saw 403208 bytes from the receiver in comparison to 3368 bytes with SCP. I've attached the relevant output from tcptrace below (the b->a column is the return side of the trace). Mostly I'm just curious as to what

Hi, We have problems to backup a large /home directory (+/- 12Go) with rsync (daemon mode) and BackupPC on ADSL static IP 4Mbps/380Kbps for the backed-up machine and Internet 10Mbps for the backup server, the rsync options are: '--numeric-ids', '--perms', '--owner', '--group', '--devices',