similar to: Fixed MIME content header field

Hello All, What could mean the following in maillog: Apr 5 23:17:40 drweb sm-mta[87118]: h35JHb15087090: Fixed MIME Content-Type header field (possible attack) Is it something to worry about? -- Nikolaj I. Potanin, SA http://www.drweb.ru ID Anti-Virus Lab (SalD Ltd) nikolaj@drweb.ru St. Petersburg, Russia ph.: +7-812-3888624

What does mean this bizarre msgid? maillog: Mar 31 19:31:15 cu sm-mta[5352]: h2VFVEGS005352: from=<nb@sindbad.ru>, size=1737, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAfp4Fa2ShPE2u4pP/QpPDIMKAAAAQAAAAj+zb4Isbuk+tYEPVF9Vf, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=wg.pu.ru [193.124.85.219] -- Nikolaj I. Potanin, SA http://www.drweb.ru ID

I tried rebuilding yesterday. It failed [I don't recall the output]. I then completely deleted the /usr/src and /usr/obj, and cvsuped again last night [Approx 7PM on 2003-06-23]. I set the machine up with a buildworld and went to bed. This am I looked at the nohup.out file that was generated and it had failed. I took out the NOMAN=false in /etc/make.conf - as it appeared the failure

> Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 09:55:40 -0700 (PDT) > From: Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com> > Subject: Re: Root users shell == no existant shell /bin/bash > To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <20040709165540.2799D2C1CC@mx5.roble.com> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > "Peter C. Lai" wrote: > > as a rule of thumb,

> Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 20:31:05 +0800 > From: Ganbold <ganbold@micom.mng.net> > Subject: Strange command histories in hacked shell server Just a minor comment on one portion of your message. [All deleted except the pertinent part - wjv] > Machine is configured in such way that everyone can create an account itself. > Some user dir permissions: > ...

Hi, I spotted today following line at my FreeBSD 4.6.2-RELEASE IPFIREWALL log: Jul 1 13:34:35 fbsd /kernel: ipfw: 1400 Accept TCP xxxxxx:22 yyyyy:22 in via ed1 where xxxxxx is the attacker's IP and yyyyy is my box. But in sshd log, there are no traces left behind by this connection. Normally, there is "Did not receive identification string from xxx" etc, when somebody tries to

Dear User, the message with following attributes has not been delivered, because contains an infected object. Sender = samba@samba.org (may be forged) Recipients = mailer-daemon@inetforce.com.ua Subject = MAIL TRANSACTION FAILED Message-ID = i0RDVRlh033718 Antivirus filter report: --- Dr.Web report --- Following virus(es) has been found: infected with Win32.HLLM.MyDoom.32768 Dr.Web detailed

Dear User, the message with following attributes has not been delivered, because contains an infected object. Sender = samba@samba.org (may be forged) Recipients = blizz@rtf-15.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua Subject = something for you Message-ID = i1OK4sac009347 Antivirus filter report: --- Dr.Web report --- Following virus(es) has been found: infected with Win32.HLLM.Foo.41984 Dr.Web detailed report:

Any chance of this being implemented in fbsd? Could be usefull ;-) ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3514.txt -- :{ andyf@speednet.com.au Andy Farkas System Administrator Speednet Communications http://www.speednet.com.au/

Dear User, the message with following attributes has not been delivered, because contains an infected object. Sender = samba@samba.org (may be forged) Recipients = vladislav.smirnov@yabloko.ru Subject = Hurts Message-ID = [unknown-id] Antivirus filter report: --- Dr.Web report --- Following virus(es) has been found: infected with Win32.HLLM.Netsky.17920 Dr.Web detailed report:

Dear User, the message with following attributes has not been delivered, because contains an infected object. Sender = samba@lists.samba.org (may be forged) Recipients = marketing@microstar.ru Subject = hi Message-ID = [unknown-id] Antivirus filter report: --- Dr.Web report --- Following virus(es) has been found: infected with Win32.HLLM.MyDoom.32768 Dr.Web detailed report:

Hmmm. This does sound odd... A couple of things I can think of off the top of my head would be: - Make sure you are using the "interfaces" option in the [global] section of your smb.conf file. This will force Samba to broadcast share info on the given interface. By default, Samba latches onto the first interface it finds (on my machine, this is usually my modem connection to the

Hi. I'm using Debian. Is this a Redhat-only list, or is it only hosted by RedHat? I recently changed my filing systems over to ext3, but deliberately left the forced boot check parameters alone so my system checks after 20 mounts. I notice that the fsck takes a good ten times longer than under ext2, to perform the cleanly unmounted check. (On the occasion where I did unmount dirtily, the

On 07/11/15 16:02, Krutskikh Ivan wrote: > Hi, > > I need to change ownership of server files to user/group defined in active > directory ( using rfc2307 and unix attributes). Chown returns no error, but > 'ls -lia' shows that file ownership is unchanged. What am I doing wrong? > > archive-test:/archive/video # ls -lia ./test.mp4 > 17121 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root

Hi, I wonder if there will be a 3rd and 4th disk (additional Packages) to 4.8-Release ... or won't there like in 5.0-Release. Thanks! Zheyu -- +++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++ Bitte l?cheln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage!

Hi, I have made this script, that I use for controlling the bandwidth on a gateway for about 100 computers. It is working quite effectively to limit the use of p2p programs (and other programs), so that you can surf undisturbed. Also, it improves internet access in general, so that one large download doesn''t take up all your bandwidth. I was wondering if someone would like to test it,

Hi, I need to change ownership of server files to user/group defined in active directory ( using rfc2307 and unix attributes). Chown returns no error, but 'ls -lia' shows that file ownership is unchanged. What am I doing wrong? archive-test:/archive/video # ls -lia ./test.mp4 17121 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2413096 ноя 2 19:50 ./test.mp4 archive-test:/archive/video # wbinfo -u

Hi all, I found similar sequences in the /var/auth.log files of freebsd boxes, I supervise.: Aug 13 13:56:08 www sshd[26091]: Illegal user test from 165.21.103.20 Aug 13 13:56:11 www sshd[26093]: Illegal user guest from 165.21.103.20 Aug 13 13:56:15 www sshd[26096]: Illegal user admin from 165.21.103.20 Aug 13 13:56:18 www sshd[26103]: Illegal user admin from 165.21.103.20 Aug 13 13:56:21 www

On 17/11/15 20:46, Jeff Dickens wrote: > indeed > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Rowland Penny > <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com <mailto:rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>> > wrote: > > On 17/11/15 20:28, Jeff Dickens wrote: > > > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Rowland Penny > <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com >

Hello! My name is Denis Shaposhnikov. I'm looking for a job in EU (Germany is preferably) as a UNIX/FreeBSD system administrator and/or network administrator that lets me utilize my experience in an Internet Service Providing (ISP). Skills: * Operating systems: UNIX (FreeBSD 2.2 - STABLE), Cisco IOS (10.x - 12.x), ZyNOS. Understand how systems work and is able to apply this