similar to: Fw: VPN setup problem - proxy arp I think

Well, after working through the various options it looked like MPD would be my best bet here. I've got it sort of working, but there's obviously some tweaky I'm missing here. Recap of the scenario: Full class C of static IPs segmented into 3 networks. Outside, DMZ, Inside. Trying to get remote Windows users through securely to the Inside. Remote users have dynamic IPs.

Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > No tests fail with the patch below, so I would say it's pretty useless. It > seems that the C bindings are the only user but we can probably just have them > return IPSCCP instead. I don't necessarily think your conclusion is wrong, but the patch isn't proving what you think it's proving. In fact, the

Author: kais Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 1fc7630bc2f33c6f0a5a5d468a01f7d44b44bbe2 Log message: 6350186 protocomp warning about var/svc/manifest/network/ssl in some cases Files: update: usr/src/Targetdirs update: usr/src/cmd/Makefile.cmd update: usr/src/cmd/cmd-inet/usr.sbin/kssl/ksslcfg/Makefile

Hi, I used the following commands on the program attached below: llvm-gcc --emit-llvm main.c -c -o main.bc opt -ipconstprop main.bc -o main1.bc diff main.bc main1.bc no difference was o/p :( The Program Segment is as shown below: #include <stdio.h> void f1(int a) { a=a+1; printf("%d",a); } void f2() { int b; b=1; f1(b); } int main() { int

Hi, I want to see the output of a InterProcedural Constant Propagation Pass IPCP in llvm. I have llvm 2.8 installed.And i used opt -print-after-all command to see the .bc output generated after each pass. However,this does not include dump produced by IPCP :( why? Kindly tell me how to view dump produced by IPCP. P.S: i have tried opt -ipcp src.bc -o src1.bc However the src.bc and src1.bc both

Hi ! Recently i switched my internet provider, to get more speed but another braindead setup regarding public ip addresses. I now have 4 PPTP Tunnel available, of which i''m using one as the gateway ip doing masquerading to other machines in my local lan, excluding three other machines, which i would like to use 1:1 nat to get them a direct access to one of the pptp tunnels. I was

Blame guus. -- Rob 'robster' Bradford Chief Editor/Lead developer DebianPlanet.org -------------- next part -------------- Sep 1 10:24:02 zeus syslogd 1.4.1#2: restart. Sep 1 10:24:17 zeus pppd[326]: rcvd [LCP EchoRep id=0x92 magic=0x9936a81f] Sep 1 10:24:47 zeus pppd[326]: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x93 magic=0x48b43815] Sep 1 10:24:47 zeus pppd[326]: rcvd [LCP EchoRep id=0x93

Hi All, I''m pulling my hair out trying to get vpn working from a windows client on the internet to my firewall. I have the following pptpd.conf file: option /etc/ppp/options.poptop stimeout 10 speed 115200 localip 196.22.35.1 remoteip 196.22.35.100-110 196.22.35.1 is my public ip address on my firewall, eth0 ip address, also my lan ip adress. options.poptop looks like this: #ipparam

Yes your chap-secret file could be the issue, it should look like this: Your_usrname * Your_password * That?s it :) But if that don?t work include this file to the list: /etc/ppp/pptpd-options It should look something like this: ipparam PoPToP lock mtu 1490 mru 1490 ms-wins 172.x.y.1 ms-dns 172.x.y.1 multilink proxyarp auth +chapms-v2 ipcp-accept-local ipcp-accept-remote lcp-echo-failure 30

Hi All, I have installed llvm-gcc4 patch to enable various llvm optimizations at -O1/-O2/-O3. This means instead of $ llvm-gcc4 --emit-llvm foo.c -o foo.bc $ opt foo.bc -o foo_optimized.bc $ llc foo_optimized.bc -o foo.o One can directly use $ llvm-gcc4 -O2 foo.c -o foo.o to get optimized foo.o - Devang + + if (optimize > 0) { + + +

I'm having a trouble. I use winXP to connect through L2TP/IPsec to one Linux server. When I try to connect in my domain appear an error at log. Plugin winbind.so loaded. WINBIND plugin initialized. using channel 36 Using interface ppp1 Connect: ppp1 <--> /dev/pts/3 sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1410> <asyncmap 0x0> <auth chap MD5> <magic 0x564e3dc9>

Hello, i have ported the BCP (Bride Control Protocol) patch for pppd 2.4.1 mentioned in http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/bridge/2004-September/000619.html to pppd 2.4.2. The kernel patch still works without problems with kernel 2.4.30. Perhaps someone else could use this patch ... Here again some documentation i have found about the BCP patch somewere else: When pppd negotiates BCP, it tells

I have searched google high and low for answers to this...and I have gotten many examples, howto, etc...but they all seem to have a slightly different configuration, and therefore, slightly different problems. Unfortunately, not enough of them show the network layout, along with the configuration, so it's hard to tell why certain IP are being used, and were they are on the network. I have

My goal is to make VPN access to our Samba PDC (FreeBSD 7.0) so that users can access there home shares from Windows clients. I have read the instructions at http://samba.org/ftp/unpacked/lorikeet/pppd/final-report.pdf, but I can't make it work. Don't know if is due to my lack of skills or has something to do with the Popop functionality in FreeBSD. Following the instructions, i made a

On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Alexey Orishko via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm have a pure 64-bit system (Intel based). Due to that I can't use 32-bit ELF > extlinux binary provided in the syslinux-6.03 package. > > Unfortunately building extlinux installer failed... > > See error below after these command: > make bios clean

On Sun, 8 Feb 2015 20:21:58 -0500 Gene Cumm via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Alexey Orishko via Syslinux > <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > I'm have a pure 64-bit system (Intel based). Due to that I can't > > use 32-bit ELF extlinux binary provided in the syslinux-6.03 > >

Hi guys, I'm have a pure 64-bit system (Intel based). Due to that I can't use 32-bit ELF extlinux binary provided in the syslinux-6.03 package. Unfortunately building extlinux installer failed... See error below after these command: make bios clean make bios (failed) ... ar cq liblpxelinux.a rawcon.o pxeboot.o pxelinux-c.o fs/pxe/dhcp_option.o fs/pxe/pxe.o fs/pxe/tftp.o

The pass is pretty rudimental (as the comment at the top of the file hints), and it seems LLVM already has IPSCCP (which should do a better job at interprocedural constant propagation). I'm also not entirely sure it's used anywhere. Is there any reason to keep it around? Thanks, -- Davide "There are no solved problems; there are only problems that are more or less solved" --

I'm wondering if I'm seeing a regression of 5616 with 3.4.8. I'm trying to set-up pptpd with winbind, which I'm doing on two machines on Debian lenny, and I'm trying on Debian Squeeze now. The Windows client is saying "Error 778: It was not possible to verify the identity of the server." The logs say that everything is ok, and that the client is hanging up the

> On Jul 14, 2017, at 10:22 AM, Davide Italiano <davide at freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com <mailto:anemet at apple.com>> wrote: >> >> >> On Jul 14, 2017, at 8:21 AM, Davide Italiano via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Brian