similar to: Exported Resources with keyword undef

Hey guys, I'm trying use check_memcached.pl to monitor a couple of memcached services running on two ports. I have my command definition setup like this: # 'check_memcached' command definition define command { command_name check_memcached command_line $USER1$/check_memcached.pl -H $HOSTADDRESS$ -p $ARG1$ } And I have my service definitions setup like this: # Define a

Hi folks, For the first time since I started playing with puppet I started down the road of using exported resources This was inspired by my reading all of the nagios related recipes that went something along the lines of class nagios { package {nagios: ensure=> latest } service {nagios : ensure => running , enable => true} Nagios_host <<! !>>

Dear list, I am trying to configure the nagios plugin called check_sip. I just read the README file included with the plugin. I follow the readme steps to configure the plugin, without success. In the nagios web interface I can see (No output!) In the status information column. If I run the chech_sip plugin from a linux console, I get /usr/local/nagios/libexec# ./check_sip -u

It seems that the nagios_service type will not write out the "name" property of nagios service objects. I had thought this was an oversight or a bug, till I saw this thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/puppet-bugs@googlegroups.com/msg10387.html which seems to imply that this is a deliberate "feature". Is this prohibition on "name" really the desired behaviour?

Hi all, I''m working on setting up Puppet to write out my Nagios configs. A few weeks back I inserted a few dummy Nagios checks into my Puppet config, and the Nagios configs were written out properly. I''ve now added loads of Nagios host and service checks like this: @@nagios_service { "check_smtp_${hostname}": check_command =>

Hi, I have a Ruby class in "nagios" module - it''s located in nagios/ manifests/ssa_nagios_checks.rb and looks like this hostclass :ssa_nagios_checks do ... end In nagios/manifests/init.pp I have class nagios::server { ... include ssa_nagios_checks ... } And I get the following error .... debug: importing ''/etc/puppet/modules/nagios/manifests/

All- Poking around in the bug database it looks like storeconfigs is being actively worked on. I am using 2.7.6 on my master as well as all the clients. I have clients boot , start puppet and get a signed cert via auto signing. The nagios module (and currently the only thing puppet does) complains a lot during compile time about not having storeconfigs enabled, which is not the case in my

Hello CentOS users, I have problems posting the question below to the Nagios mailing list (my subscription is not accepted for some reason). Has anybody of you already had this probably frequent problem with Nagios in CentOS? I can''t use check_squid from command-plugins.cfg (s. below) Thank you for any hints Alex ---------- Forwarded message ---------- To: nagios-users at

I am using stored configs to manage my nagios host and services checks and I have run into a problem that I have been unable to solve. When the stored configs are purged from puppet the nagios server correctly removes them from the services and hosts file but does not notify the nagios service and instead throws an error. So the entries are still there and nagios still reports on them until

Hey all, I have a local disk check defined which is giving me an error: Current Status: UNKNOWN (for 0d 0h 1m 38s)Status Information:Unknown argument Usage: check_disk -w limit -c limit [-W limit] [-K limit] {-p pathPerformance Data:-x device} [-C] [-E] [-e] [-f] [-g group ] [-k] [-l] [-M] [-m] [-R path ] [-r path ] [-t timeout] [-u unit] [-v] [-X type] [-N type] [-n] I have a local check

On 14/05/2015 02:42, Tim Dunphy wrote: > Hey all, > > I have a local disk check defined which is giving me an error: > > Current Status: > UNKNOWN > (for 0d 0h 1m 38s)Status Information:Unknown argument > Usage: > check_disk -w limit -c limit [-W limit] [-K limit] {-p pathPerformance Data:-x > device} [-C] [-E] [-e] [-f] [-g group ] [-k] [-l] [-M] [-m] [-R path ]

Hi all, For months now I''ve been using Puppet with PuppetDB backend to manage my Nagios configs. We now have 1200+ services being checked and including servicedependency, host, hostdependency, command and other Nagios resources being managed, that''s about 3000 resources in total. Unfortunately this means the monitoring server takes about 8 minutes to perform a Puppet run.

Hello, I need some advice on having rsync automatically create directories on the destination server I have the following directory structure: source host: /home/user1/ /home/user2/ etc. /var/lib/mysql/db1 /var/lib/mysql/db2 etc. On the destination host (host_name) I have: /home/backups/host_name/ and I want to backup the source host to this dir so that at the end of the backup I have:

So I have the following: define nagios::service ( $nagios_template = ''service-template'', $host_name = $fqdn, $service_groups = '''', $contact_groups = $default_contact_group, $max_check_attempts = 3, $dependency = false, $dependent_host = $fqdn, $dependent_service = '''', $check_command = '''' ) {

This module does basically what I have done in the very beginning. Create an empty directory as a preparation step for the configuration files. But this configuration also did not regenerate the files. Seems, I will stick with my workaround and delete the files manually and the restart the Puppet agent. If anyone is interested in details, see: http://wp.me/p1RukY-1n. Thanks for helping, Gabriel!

Hi, I''m happily aware of the way that there is no concept of unmanaging something and when this is in the context of a file ownership or whatever, then that makes sense. But when this is applied to things like nagios configuration data the principle seems to come unstuck. Or at least, it seems so to me. Say I have a nagios_service which uses another template nagios_service. I am about

Hi all, I need to mount a Windows share locally on my laptop. However, I cannot do this via sudo mount -t smbfs //host_name/share_name /local_mount because the host_name has two IP addresses with it as shown by nmblookup //host_name. (That is, I try mounting and I'm given this error: mount error(115): Operation now in progress Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs)

On Mon, 6 May 2024, openssh at tr.id.au wrote: > ... and I guess your next question will be about compilation environment, so: > > ``` > $ gcc --version > gcc (Gentoo 13.2.1_p20240210 p14) 13.2.1 20240210 > Copyright (C) 2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO > warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY

Hi all, At the suggestion of a user, I''ve added a Service.open method in CVS. Looks like this: service = Service.open("ClipSrv") puts service.display_name puts service.service_description # or Service.open("myservice") do |s| s.service_description = "test" s.display_name = "new display" s.configure_service end What do you think? Dan

On Sat, 4 May 2024, openssh at tr.id.au wrote: > Hey there, > > I often want different behavior in my ssh client depending on > whether I'm logging into an interactive session or running > a remote non-interactive command. We can see at, say, > https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/499562/305714 that this isn't a > unique wish, and existing solutions are kind of baroque.