similar to: Banging my head on wall (hosts)

On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 16:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Billy Bob <billysbobs at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Friday, January 11, 2019 3:14 AM, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >I have no idea where the above is coming from, but it isn't from > >the dhcp scripts. > > > > I don't know what to tell you,

On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:23:41 +0000 (UTC) Billy Bob <billysbobs at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 10, 2019 2:56 PM, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >Uncomment line 10, adjust it for prefix if Samba isn't in /usr/local and then try again. > Here it is with script properly configured. > Regarding

On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:40:30 +0000 (UTC) Billy Bob <billysbobs at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Thursday, January 10, 2019 2:33 PM, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > >On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:18:37 +0000 (UTC)> > >Billy Bob <billysbobs at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > >>  > >> >

On Friday, January 11, 2019 11:20 AM, Billy Bob via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:     On Friday, January 11, 2019 10:44 AM, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 16:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Billy Bob <billysbobs at yahoo.com> wrote: >>> Here is what the logs show WITHOUT the -d option: >>> >>> Jan

On Friday, January 11, 2019 3:14 AM, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >I have no idea where the above is coming from, but it isn't from the dhcp scripts. > I don't know what to tell you, Rowland. The previous logs were with the -d option in place, and those extra lines were what was added as a result of the -d option. Here is what the logs

I am running Samba 4.1.12 with SSSD 1.12.2 on RHEL 7.1. I have joined my system to a Win 2008r2 domain. I have added the necessary unix attributes to all relevant users and groups. When I add a domain group to a directory, either as the primary group or as an ACL, I can access the share locally from the server, but cannot access the share from a Windows system via the SMB share. If I change

On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:18:37 +0000 (UTC) Billy Bob <billysbobs at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 10, 2019 2:08 PM, Billy Bob via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >Do you want to change your scripts to match my scripts as found on > >the wiki ? > >I know they work, well they have for me for the last 6 years. > >

On Thursday, January 10, 2019 2:56 PM, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >Uncomment line 10, adjust it for prefix if Samba isn't in /usr/local >and then try again. Here it is with script properly configured. Regarding the later lines having to do with the script, I clearly don't know what exactly is causing them. But surely they are all somehow part

On Friday, January 11, 2019 10:44 AM, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 16:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Billy Bob <billysbobs at yahoo.com> wrote: >> Here is what the logs show WITHOUT the -d option: >> >> Jan 11 10:00:36 dc01 dhcpd[1704]: Commit: IP: 172.20.10.165 DHCID: >> 1:d4:be:d9:22:9f:7d Name: mgmt01 Jan 11 10:00:36

On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 17:44:48 +0000 (UTC) Billy Bob via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Friday, January 11, 2019 11:20 AM, Billy Bob via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >     On Friday, January 11, 2019 10:44 AM, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Jan 2019

On Thursday, January 10, 2019 2:33 PM, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:18:37 +0000 (UTC)> >Billy Bob <billysbobs at yahoo.com> wrote: > >>  >> >>    On Thursday, January 10, 2019 2:08 PM, Billy Bob via samba >> <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >Do you want to change your

On Friday, January 11, 2019 1:39 PM, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:   > There doesn't seem to be anything really wrong there,the only really > difference between your named.conf and mine is that I have: >  >     dnssec-validation no; >     dnssec-enable no; >     dnssec-lookaside no; >     listen-on-v6 { none; }; >     listen-on port 53

Hi, this is my first nut installation, i see lot of connection failure and when i tried the configuration removing the power chord from the ups i expected tha machine will power itslef down but this has not happened. I'm using nut 2.2.2-2 from debian lenny, ups is a mustek powermust 2000 with usb cable. All config files are root:nut and 640, i've had to add nut user to nut group

All, Trying to figure out how to deal with, I assume, a dying disk that's unfortunately on / (ext3). Getting errors similar to: Dec 31 20:44:30 mybox kernel: hdb: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } Dec 31 20:44:30 mybox kernel: hdb: dma_intr: error=0x40 { UncorrectableError }, LBAsect=163423, high=0, low=163423, sector=163360 Dec 31 20:44:30 mybox kernel: end_request:

I'm moving this over to flac-users... Anyway, are you using Mike Wren's installer? I'm not familiar with that yet. Josh --- C&K Slagle <ckslagle@earthlink.net> wrote: > have winamp installed on a partitioned drive. > I installed the most recent version of Flac which includes the plugin > for > winamp. However, .flac files are not recognized in winamp.. Is it

Hello, We have R working with Rmpi/openmpi, but I'm a little worried. Specifically, (a) the -np flag doesn't seem to override the hostfile (it works fine with fortran hello world) and (b) I appear to have twice as many processes running as I think I should. Rmpi version 0.5.5 Openmpi version 1.1 Viglen HPC with (effectively) 9 blades and 8 nodes on each blade. myhosts file contains

Any ideas on how asterisk could accept an email (such as an email to SMS or "number at mybox.org" sort of thing) and make a phone call to a specific number and make an announcement? I imagine the first part is the big question. joe a.

Using dovecot version v1.0.beta8 on FreeBSD 6.1_RELEASE with login_process_per_connection = no in the dovecot.conf file, I still get a new imap process for each IMAP login. That is, if a single user logs in five times, five imap processes are created. The difference appears to be that with a "yes" setting each user login causes a new copy of the imap-login processes to be forked,

I'm trying to follow the instructions for configuring Dovecot LMTP with postfix for virtual domains but whenever mail arrives, in /var/log/maillog, I see Sep 23 16:01:20 mybox postfix/pipe[572]: 999C83206C6: to=< user at mytest.domain.com>, relay=dovecot, delay=0.08, delays=0.04/0.01/0/0.03, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (temporary failure. Command output: pipe: fatal: pipe_command: execvp

What is the best way to upgrade to Python 2.6 from the default Python 2.4. I'm running CentOS 5 --> Linux mybox.domain.com 2.6.18-238.9.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Apr 12 18:10:13 EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I've read these horror stories online and don't want to break yum.