similar to: jail performance questions

Hi, This is the first time I've come across this: pid 11415 (ipfw), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) The core dump landed in root's home directory in one of my jails. Has anyone seen this before? Should I be concerned? chkrootkit says nothing. (How trustworthy is its output? ;-) Thanks. Cheers. -- Ng Pheng Siong <ngps@netmemetic.com> http://firewall.rulemaker.net

Hello there. The FreeBSD-SA-04:05.openssl Security Advisory announced a "null-pointer assignment during SSL handshake" DoS vulnerability. However, the OpenSSH Security Advisory of 17 March 2004 announced the same vulnerability with one more vulnerability. Look at http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20040317.txt Isn't FreeBSD vulnerable to the second "Out-of-bounds read affects

OK, an official OpenSSH advisory was released, see here: <URL: http://www.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-announce/2003-September/000063.html > The fix is currently in FreeBSD -CURRENT and -STABLE. It will be applied to the security branches as well today. Attached are patches: buffer46.patch -- For FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE and later buffer45.patch -- For FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE and

I'm setting up a server where I plan to use Jails to improve security I also have installed and am configuring ipfilter. Here are my questions: Because I'm using Jails, I will have to have multiple ip aliases on the network interface. I will use ipfilter to specify what can go to each of the addresses. (e.g., allow only incoming to port 80 on the jail running apache). Another

To much of my dissapointment, the uptime on my TxD account does not improve. What alternatives do we have for hosting Rails projects on shared accounts? I would love to keep lighttpd and the level of control I have on TxD but wouldn''t like to spend much more (I am currently on the 25$/month plan). I won''t need much support, but I would love to have subversion

Any information on when (or if) the following timestamp vulnerability will be fixed for 4.X? Any information would be appreciated. http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/637934 Thanks. Richard Coleman rcoleman@criticalmagic.com

Hello List, I know FreeBSD 4.x is old..., but we are using on a production system with postgres and apache. The above message is appearing periodically. I googled for the message but found no recommendation for adjusting it. Any suggestions. Thanks, Steve -- "They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Ben Franklin)

Hi, IS is possible to align a chart to the left of the plot area as to make space for a legend? -- Regards/Groete/Mit freundlichen Grüßen/recuerdos/meilleures salutations/ distinti saluti/siong/duì yú/привет Jurgens de Bruin [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-05:08.kmem Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Local kernel memory disclosure Category: core Module: sys Announced: 2005-05-06

Hi There, I've been having an issue trying to figure out a way to policy route outbound packets from a multihomed machine through the proper interface using IPFW to no avail. I've tried several different incantations of IPFW fwd/forward statements, and none of them seem to do the trick. Basically, I have a host that has multiple Internet connections. This host is running FreeBSD 4.9

We are trying to upgrade a machine with jails from 5.0 to 5.1. We've CVS'd and done the upgrade on the 'main' machine, but how do we mount our build directory to upgrade the jails? Thanx! -- Dave -- Dave Kingsley Voice: 617-745-3806 Systems Administrator FAX: 617-745-3907 Eastern Nazarene College 23 E. Elm Avenue E-mail: kingsled@enc.edu Quincy, MA 02170

Hi all, Is it mandatory to add device mem to jails to enable network via the gateway? Left ezjail with FreeBSD-6.3 (and a hardware replacement of my server) and am now starting again with FreeBSD-7.1. Early this week, I upgraded from 7.0 to 7.1 (not having 'used' jails on 7.0). After creating the jail with `ezjail-admin update -i` I created a 'ports build' jail `ezjail-admin

Hello security gurus, yesterday, I mistakenly posted a question on the questions list about this article : http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13676/info/ which talks about a form of DOS vulnerability. I was curious as to the possibility of FreeBSD 5.x being affected, and if anyone was working on this or not. Ted Mittelstaedt posted this possible patch based upon the OpenBSD patch : in

http://wiki.freebsd.org/JailResourceLimits Is this anthing people are working on? Is it on its way to RELENG_7? Is there a 7-version of the patch or anything? This would be a _VERY_ useful feature. -- Peter Ankerst?l peter@pean.org

hi i've got the the problem that i can't su -l <someone> an my client machine. $ su -l admin su: no directory i can login locally, login via ssh, su -l root without any problems. SERVER: FreeBSD4.8 stabel (~ 1 week ago last cvs update) runs NIS, NFS, DNS, FTP, SAMBA, NTP CLIENT> FreeBSD5.1 release (rebuild kernel using KERNCONF=SMP) i didn't had problems with have

HI everyone, I have resently installed a jail environment on my freebsd box, and had some problems getting postgresql running under it. After looking a bit on various mailinglists i figured out that I needed to set jail.sysvipc_allowed to be 1 using sysctl in order to make postgresql run. However man jail gives me: jail.sysvipc_allowed This MIB entry determines whether or not

Hello, I have configured jail for users with sshd ftpd and auth. I started this jail on IP 127.0.0.10(there is an alias on lo0 interface), there was not any bigger problem to start it. But i have a problem with internet in this jail. I can log in to this jail through ssh or ftpd but i can't connect to the internet. I try to set up some kind of nat but it doesn't work. Can anybody help me

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-05:02.sendfile Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: sendfile kernel memory disclosure Category: core Module: sys_kern Announced:

I was wondering if there's any non-executable stack patch for FreeBSD's kernel. I searched in google but all I got was some questions in freebsd-security back from 2001 and an answer saying someone heard about a project like this, but no information at all. Is there any patch like PaX or Openwall available for FreeBSD? I dont want to discuss if its useless or not since there're a

Hi, IP traffic from one jail to another jail, arrives on destination jail on lo0 having the destination jails IP as source IP. Why not the source jail's IP address? How can I filter traffic from one jail to another, using ipfw of ipf? Cheers, -- Anders.