similar to: A thousand apologies :)

Good morning all; Whils't running chkrootkit 0.42 on one of my 4.7-REL boxen it reported : <snip> Checking 'biff'...not infected ]: not found [: -ne: argument expected Checking 'chfn'...not infected ]: not found [: -ne: argument expected <snip> I've been unable to locate any information ref. the " ]: not found " and " [: -ne: argument

Sincerely; David Hutchens III Network Technician DRS Surveillance Support Systems - A division of DRS Technologies. (727) 541-6681 ext.3313 david.hutchens@drs-sss.com <mailto:david.hutchens@drs-sss.com>

On 10/12/14 18:58, Tim wrote: > At the moment numbers start at 3000000 and counting. In my eyes it > would make sense, that these number be stored in the AD when > provisioned with rfc2307. Or it should be replicated by drs. The numbers you are seeing are coming from idmap.ldb, now as you are using Sernet packages on Centos7, this will be in /var/lib/samba/private/idmap.ldb. The

On 10/12/14 16:33, Tim wrote: > I think I will only need uid and gid due to fs stuff. There are only > Windows clients in that domain. > So when the IDs are the same on both DCs, all will be fine I think. > > In RSAT there are no Unix attributes set. As an example: user1 has uid > 3000021 on DC1 (first provisioned one). DRS seems fine. On DC2 user1 > gets uid 3000017. >

On 10/12/14 21:05, Tim wrote: > Thanks for your answer and time you offer for me. That makes it a bit > clearer. > > I searched the web and found that rsat needs to have the nis tools > installed. Good luck with trying to install 'Service for NIS', it installs on a windows AD DC, you haven't got a windows AD DC, you have a Samba AD DC and guess what, it already

Thanks for the fast reply. Sorry - I was not aware that attachments are not forwarded. (All information you requested was included there) I think I have already tried resync via "samba-tool drs replicate" - but better see below the printout of previous attachment "faiserver.log" Thanks for help in advance :) root at faiserver:~# uname -a Linux faiserver.example.corp

On 10/12/14 17:30, Tim wrote: > I will try this tomorrow. Possibly this is my fix. > > When a domain is provisioned with rfc2307 it would make sense that > Unix attributes especially uid/gid would automatically be set. This is a common misconception, it does not happen, one reason being, what number do you start at ?? > > A member also needs this to be set for unique fs acls

On 10/12/14 21:53, Tim wrote: > > Am 10. Dezember 2014 22:26:52 MEZ, schrieb Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>: >> On 10/12/14 21:05, Tim wrote: >>> Thanks for your answer and time you offer for me. That makes it a bit >>> clearer. >>> >>> I searched the web and found that rsat needs to have the nis tools >>> installed.

Hai,     > When running second command I recieve error: > root at location-000001:~# systemctl start bind9 samba > Failed to start samba.service: Unit samba.service is masked.   ah yes, sorry, that is offcourse samba-ad-dc   >and yep - replication is working then!! :) what i expected the old bug. ;-)   About the other start up for both DC's do the following.  type :   systemctl

Hello, I just realized that my second DC does not recognize the users from the AD. wbinfo -u/-g are working just fine. [root at dc1 ~]# id bruno.castro uid=10004(POL\bruno.castro) gid=100(users) grupos=100(users),10001(POL\ti),3000009(BUILTIN\users) [root at dc2 ~]# id bruno.castro id: bruno.castro: no such user [root at dc1 ~]# wbinfo -i bruno.castro POL\bruno.castro:*:10004:100:Bruno de

On 13/10/15 14:19, Guilherme Boing wrote: > Hello, > > I just realized that my second DC does not recognize the users from the AD. > wbinfo -u/-g are working just fine. > > [root at dc1 ~]# id bruno.castro > uid=10004(POL\bruno.castro) gid=100(users) > grupos=100(users),10001(POL\ti),3000009(BUILTIN\users) > > [root at dc2 ~]# id bruno.castro > id: bruno.castro: no

At the moment numbers start at 3000000 and counting. In my eyes it would make sense, that these number be stored in the AD when provisioned with rfc2307. Or it should be replicated by drs. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Using_RFC2307_on_a_Samba_DC#Configuring_RFC2307_and_NIS_Extensions_in_a_Samba_AD says the following: No need for manual ID counting when using the default Microsoft tools. E. g.

I will try this tomorrow. Possibly this is my fix. When a domain is provisioned with rfc2307 it would make sense that Unix attributes especially uid/gid would automatically be set. A member also needs this to be set for unique fs acls right? Am 10. Dezember 2014 18:07:02 MEZ, schrieb Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>: >On 10/12/14 16:33, Tim wrote: >> I think I will

Hi, It seems unlikely that the KCC is the cause of these issues. The KCC is only responsible for telling who to connect (and when) and doesn't actually affect any underlying network connectivity. Connectivity between the spokes should not be required and the communication between them is usually just some stale data. But none of that should affect either of these commands. Unless the DRS

Hello everyone, I have setup two Samba AD DC's running Debian 9 with BIND9_DLZ dns backend. Both are running Samba 4.5.16 - I know it is already very old version but this is the default one coming with debian stretch repo. (I will upgrade to Debian buster - and with this to newer Samba version - as soon as it is released stable and I could test the upgrade correctly :) )

On 6/26/2017 2:43 PM, Johannes Engel via samba wrote: > Dear list, > > After (almost) successfully removing a dead DC from my domain I am left > with only one visible symptom: > samba-tool drs showrepl shows two stale outbound link for one of the > remaining 2 DCs: > DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=subdom,DC=mydom,DC=com > NTDS DN: CN=NTDS >

Hello Rowland, I should also mention that Samba 4.3.0 was installed from tarball, I compiled it myself. DC2 does not have the /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb file. Also it did not return any result on DC1. However, using /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb, both DCs returned the same thing: # returned 4 records # 1 entries # 3 referrals I wonder why DC1 has the /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb file

Hai, Before you start, Backup, /etc/ /var/lib/samba better safe than sorry.. Stop samba and related services ( check it at least nmbd smbd winbind samba samba-ad-dc) > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Prunk Dump via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 21 juni 2017 11:57 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp:

Thanks for your answer and time you offer for me. That makes it a bit clearer. I searched the web and found that rsat needs to have the nis tools installed. Does it create Unix uid/gid automatically then? Without rfc2307 information it makes no sense to me to have a *nix machine for file services and another one for backup purposes, when uid and gid are not same (due to preserve acls). And for

On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Garming Sam <garming at catalyst.net.nz> wrote: > Hi, > > It seems unlikely that the KCC is the cause of these issues. The KCC is > only responsible for telling who to connect (and when) and doesn't > actually affect any underlying network connectivity. Connectivity > between the spokes should not be required and the communication