similar to: testing

Good morning all; Whils't running chkrootkit 0.42 on one of my 4.7-REL boxen it reported : <snip> Checking 'biff'...not infected ]: not found [: -ne: argument expected Checking 'chfn'...not infected ]: not found [: -ne: argument expected <snip> I've been unable to locate any information ref. the " ]: not found " and " [: -ne: argument

A thousand apologies :) No intent to "spam" - thank you for informing me of freebsd-test@freebsd.org Should've cleared out the stale test messages from my mail queue after fixing my dns. David Hutchens david.hutchens@drs-sss.com

Thanks for the fast reply. Sorry - I was not aware that attachments are not forwarded. (All information you requested was included there) I think I have already tried resync via "samba-tool drs replicate" - but better see below the printout of previous attachment "faiserver.log" Thanks for help in advance :) root at faiserver:~# uname -a Linux faiserver.example.corp

Hai,     > When running second command I recieve error: > root at location-000001:~# systemctl start bind9 samba > Failed to start samba.service: Unit samba.service is masked.   ah yes, sorry, that is offcourse samba-ad-dc   >and yep - replication is working then!! :) what i expected the old bug. ;-)   About the other start up for both DC's do the following.  type :   systemctl

Hello, I just realized that my second DC does not recognize the users from the AD. wbinfo -u/-g are working just fine. [root at dc1 ~]# id bruno.castro uid=10004(POL\bruno.castro) gid=100(users) grupos=100(users),10001(POL\ti),3000009(BUILTIN\users) [root at dc2 ~]# id bruno.castro id: bruno.castro: no such user [root at dc1 ~]# wbinfo -i bruno.castro POL\bruno.castro:*:10004:100:Bruno de

On 13/10/15 14:19, Guilherme Boing wrote: > Hello, > > I just realized that my second DC does not recognize the users from the AD. > wbinfo -u/-g are working just fine. > > [root at dc1 ~]# id bruno.castro > uid=10004(POL\bruno.castro) gid=100(users) > grupos=100(users),10001(POL\ti),3000009(BUILTIN\users) > > [root at dc2 ~]# id bruno.castro > id: bruno.castro: no

On 10/12/14 18:58, Tim wrote: > At the moment numbers start at 3000000 and counting. In my eyes it > would make sense, that these number be stored in the AD when > provisioned with rfc2307. Or it should be replicated by drs. The numbers you are seeing are coming from idmap.ldb, now as you are using Sernet packages on Centos7, this will be in /var/lib/samba/private/idmap.ldb. The

Hello everyone, I have setup two Samba AD DC's running Debian 9 with BIND9_DLZ dns backend. Both are running Samba 4.5.16 - I know it is already very old version but this is the default one coming with debian stretch repo. (I will upgrade to Debian buster - and with this to newer Samba version - as soon as it is released stable and I could test the upgrade correctly :) )

On 10/12/14 21:05, Tim wrote: > Thanks for your answer and time you offer for me. That makes it a bit > clearer. > > I searched the web and found that rsat needs to have the nis tools > installed. Good luck with trying to install 'Service for NIS', it installs on a windows AD DC, you haven't got a windows AD DC, you have a Samba AD DC and guess what, it already

Hello Rowland, I should also mention that Samba 4.3.0 was installed from tarball, I compiled it myself. DC2 does not have the /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb file. Also it did not return any result on DC1. However, using /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb, both DCs returned the same thing: # returned 4 records # 1 entries # 3 referrals I wonder why DC1 has the /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb file

Hai, Before you start, Backup, /etc/ /var/lib/samba better safe than sorry.. Stop samba and related services ( check it at least nmbd smbd winbind samba samba-ad-dc) > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Prunk Dump via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 21 juni 2017 11:57 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp:

On 10/12/14 16:33, Tim wrote: > I think I will only need uid and gid due to fs stuff. There are only > Windows clients in that domain. > So when the IDs are the same on both DCs, all will be fine I think. > > In RSAT there are no Unix attributes set. As an example: user1 has uid > 3000021 on DC1 (first provisioned one). DRS seems fine. On DC2 user1 > gets uid 3000017. >

On 10/12/14 21:53, Tim wrote: > > Am 10. Dezember 2014 22:26:52 MEZ, schrieb Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>: >> On 10/12/14 21:05, Tim wrote: >>> Thanks for your answer and time you offer for me. That makes it a bit >>> clearer. >>> >>> I searched the web and found that rsat needs to have the nis tools >>> installed.

On 10/12/14 17:30, Tim wrote: > I will try this tomorrow. Possibly this is my fix. > > When a domain is provisioned with rfc2307 it would make sense that > Unix attributes especially uid/gid would automatically be set. This is a common misconception, it does not happen, one reason being, what number do you start at ?? > > A member also needs this to be set for unique fs acls

At the moment numbers start at 3000000 and counting. In my eyes it would make sense, that these number be stored in the AD when provisioned with rfc2307. Or it should be replicated by drs. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Using_RFC2307_on_a_Samba_DC#Configuring_RFC2307_and_NIS_Extensions_in_a_Samba_AD says the following: No need for manual ID counting when using the default Microsoft tools. E. g.

Changing the vapply() behavior makes sense in principle. I analyzed the CRAN code base using the R parser and found 143 instances of calling vapply with USE.NAMES=FALSE. These would need to be inspected to understand the consequences of the change. For reference: /AzureML/R/datasets.R:226 /BBmisc/R/toRangeStr.R:33 /DBI/R/DBDriver.R:205 /Kmisc/R/str_rev.R:37 /Matrix/R/diagMatrix.R:98

I think I will only need uid and gid due to fs stuff. There are only Windows clients in that domain. So when the IDs are the same on both DCs, all will be fine I think. In RSAT there are no Unix attributes set. As an example: user1 has uid 3000021 on DC1 (first provisioned one). DRS seems fine. On DC2 user1 gets uid 3000017. If I set ID in RSAT Unix attributes after choosing domain, the IDs

Ok, some more resolving things to fix.   On both DC's few things to edit. In resolv.conf, the order is important here and dont point to nameserver 127.0.0.1 for the DC's.   DC1. file: /etc/resolv.conf  search example.corp nameserver IP_DC1 nameserver IP_DC2 nameserver 8.8.4.4 /etc/hosts IP_DC1 hostname.internal.example.com hostname IP_DC2 hostname.internal.example.com hostname     

Dear R Community, I would like to announce the package "surveillance", which provides methods for the surveillance of count data time series originating from the routine collection of public health data. The package addresses epidemiologists and statisticians working with routine surveillance, but it also offers an infrastructure for developers of new detection algorithms. Implemented

Dear R Community, I would like to announce the package "surveillance", which provides methods for the surveillance of count data time series originating from the routine collection of public health data. The package addresses epidemiologists and statisticians working with routine surveillance, but it also offers an infrastructure for developers of new detection algorithms. Implemented