similar to: variable scope is making my head hurt

Is there any security (or perhaps plans to add security) within the fileserver to verify that clients are only able to receive files specified in the manifests on the server? I''d like to distribute different Kerberos keytabs to different nodes such that nodes www01 and www02 can retrieve different files from nodes www03 and www04. Any ideas on how best to approach this problem? Thanks,

I''d like to create a component that takes different actions based on the classes associated with the node using the component. Is this possible? Here''s what I''m thinking. node www01 { include webserver website { "site1.com": aliases => ["www.site1.com", "test.site1.com"], username => www0001 } } node www02 { include

I just upgraded to 0.22.0 from 0.18.4 and I''m running into what I think are problems due to changes in scope rules. In my site.pp manifest, I have the following: import "classes/*" node nfsserver { include nfsserver } node webserver { include webserver } class cluster1_sites { website { "example.com": ...; "example2.com": ...; } } node

Hi all, I have a problem with logrotate and I don't know why. In /var/log/messages appears these errors: Apr 8 15:01:01 plzfnsm02 logrotate: ALERT exited abnormally with [1] Apr 8 16:01:01 plzfnsm02 logrotate: ALERT exited abnormally with [1] Apr 8 17:01:01 plzfnsm02 logrotate: ALERT exited abnormally with [1] Apr 8 18:01:01 plzfnsm02 logrotate: ALERT exited abnormally with [1] Apr 8

Yesterday, I switched our node structure from using node basenode, node nodetype inherits basenode, to using node classes per the changes discussed recently on this list and as defined in the wiki:GlossaryOfTerms. In the manifest, we have a syslog module which sets up all the components of syslog-ng we''re using. The ''syslog'' class is used by default on clients and then

Hi! while trying to use llvm::DominatorTreeBase on a custom graph that has nothing to do with llvm::BasicBlock I ran into some difficulties, because llvm::DominatorTreeBase calls e.g. getParent()->front() directly on the nodes and uses llvm::Inverse which forced me to implement my GraphTraits also for Inverse. This could be solved using a compile time abstraction of Graph instread of

I tried debugging it and the issue seems to be in the implementation of MachineInstrIterator.h and the way it interacts with GraphWriter.h functions. I found this by replacing the ( template <> struct GraphTraits<MCDFGraph<MachineFunction*> >) with a similar MCDFGraph based template of CFG similar to the one in MachineFunction.h (similarly replacing the DOTGraphTraits with the

Hi, I am trying to generate the DFG of machine functions. Initially, I added a pass to generate the DFG of LLVM IR functions. This was based on the mail thread - http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-September/025582.html. This pass worked fine and I was able to generate DFG of LLVM IR functions. Later, I ported the DFG pass code for machine functions. I ported the InstIterator.h

Chris Lattner wrote: > It's more of an algorithm than a datastructure. Where else in the > codebase would it be useful to use? If only in one place, it is > probably reasonable to put it near the code that uses it. > > -Chris > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu

Hello, I’m trying to port a project up to 4.0 and I’m seeing the following error: In file included from /Users/jaredcarlson/Projects/llvm-4.0.0.src/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h:13: /Users/jaredcarlson/Projects/llvm-4.0.0.src/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:139:13: error: no type named 'type' in 'std::__1::result_of<std::__1::pointer_to_unary_function<llvm::DSNode *, llvm::DSNode

Hi, I changed the XML parser who have been write by Greg (Gregory Hill) and changed some things. It did not work in IE and Safari and opera. I fixed some bugs. Now it works fine in IE, Safari, Firefox and Opera. /* --------------------------------------- */ XMLParser = Class.create(); Object.extend(XMLParser.prototype, { initialize: function (XMLFile, options) {

I changed the code to be more prototype-esque, and created a class called XMLDoc. I may add more functionality to it later, hence the more generic name, but you do something like this to convert XML to a hash: XMLDoc = Class.create(); Object.extend(XMLDoc.prototype, { initialize: function (xmlDoc) { this.element = xmlDoc; }, asHash: function () { if (! this._xmlHash) {

TableGen, as a DSL language, is made up of records. Every def corresponds to a record. For example, TableGen has a class Register, and your backend will define records by def GPR8 : Register<...>. You are correct in saying that the record definition is one of the SDNode values. These correspond 1:1 to llvm::ISD::NodeType

I am using gcc 3.2.3 on RHEL 3 to build llvm 2.2. Below are the build errors: /home/i00171/Work/llvm-work/src/llvm-2.2/include/llvm/Analysis/DominatorInternals.h:147: no type named `NodeType' in `class llvm::BasicBlock' /home/i00171/Work/llvm-work/src/llvm-2.2/include/llvm/Analysis/DominatorInternals.h:150: ` VInfo' undeclared (first use this function)

Hi , i have xml document like this <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-9"?> <Root><Stk Category="601" Group="60101" Brand="001">.................... then i have to use Category attribute but reader class couldnt recognize attributes when i use these codes below for testing; while reader.read puts reader.node_type end

is there anybody who knows how we can get child values using libxml (Reader class) def xml_import_to_brands require''xml'' reader = XML::Reader.file(''c:/brands.xml'') . . .

In general for what most people do ipconfig is equivalent to ifconfig (getting phased out) or ip in linux. What I am trying to do is create ipconfig script that acts identical to the windows behavior's output so I can create better scripts in powershell that work on both platforms. ipconfig has few options that are not listed with ifconfig or ip. The Windows IP Configuration section has two

Hi all, I work a lot with scripts that modify the DOM, and I have always found quite annoying that the code would always get very verbose as soon as I wanted to create even simple structures : var my_div = document.createElement(''div''); var my_anchor = document.createElement(''a''); my_anchor.setAttribute(''href'',my_link); var my_text =

FYI, just tried to upgrade my prototype from 1.5.something to 1.5.1.1 and when I did an ajax based form submission, I my browser pegged the CPU. FireBug tells me there is too much recursion online 1294: if (!element || !element.tagName || element.nodeType == 3 || I don''t have enough time to submit a proper bug report but wanted to let people know.

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Sanjiv Gupta wrote: > I am using gcc 3.2.3 on RHEL 3 to build llvm 2.2. > Below are the build errors: > > /home/i00171/Work/llvm-work/src/llvm-2.2/include/llvm/Analysis/DominatorInternals.h:147: > no > type named `NodeType' in `class llvm::BasicBlock' > /home/i00171/Work/llvm-work/src/llvm-2.2/include/llvm/Analysis/DominatorInternals.h:150: >