Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "Re: OT: Suggestions for RAID HW for 2 SATA drives in"
2007 Sep 03
1
Re: OT: Suggestions for RAID HW for 2 SATA drives in
On 31 August 2007, Phil Schaffner <Philip.R.Schaffner at NASA.gov> wrote:
> > Message: 21
> <snip>
> > As discussed recently on-list, VMware CPU requirements to support
> > virtualization are not nearly so rigorous as for Xen. You are
> > probably OK with VMware on most any relatively modern x86 or x86_64
> > CPU.
> >
2007 Sep 01
0
Re: OT: Suggestions for RAID HW for 2 SATA drives in
On 31 August 2007, Phil Schaffner <Philip.R.Schaffner at NASA.gov> wrote:
> Message: 21
<snip>
> As discussed recently on-list, VMware CPU requirements to support
> virtualization are not nearly so rigorous as for Xen. You are
> probably OK with VMware on most any relatively modern x86 or x86_64
> CPU.
>
2009 Jun 28
1
Partitionning for future.
Hi all,
I have a disk of 146Gb in a machine intended to have
mainly mysql database, apache and some web data.? I didn't use LVM for
/ and /boot during the installtion
Could I extend? easily in the future the /var partition? when I add another disk?
?Filesystem??????????? Size? Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/cciss/c0d0p6????? 23G? 432M?? 22G?? 2% /
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
2007 Aug 28
2
Blackberry Bounces [was Fwd: Delivery Status Notification(Failure)]
Is everyone else posting to this list getting one of these after
each-and-every post? If so, someone please un-subscribe this person:
rsivak at tmo.blackberry.net
Phil
-------- Forwarded Message --------
> From: postmaster at tmo.blackberry.net
> To: Philip.R.Schaffner at NASA.gov
> Subject: Delivery Status Notification(Failure)
> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:32:02 GMT
>
> Your
2007 Sep 12
0
Re: [CentOS-devel] Areca RAID drivers
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 23:32 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Phil Schaffner wrote:
> > Karanbir provided driver disk images and indicated that kmod drivers
> > would be in CentOS-5 Extras, but apparently these never materialized.
> > The only src.rpm I could turn up was the last link above, and I did get
> > CentOS-5 x86_64 kmod-style drivers to build from
2011 Mar 31
1
CentOS Digest, Vol 74, Issue 31
thanks for the reply, Phil
It would, were udev not inserting USB and/or eSATA drives at /dev/sdb1
and/or /dev/sdc1 and exposing the array to the udev rule intended to
handle only removable devices (at sdc or sdd). The array then mounts
unpredictably in /media/xxx-sdc1 or sdd1 - not what is wanted - depend
on how many removable devices are plugged at the time of rebooting. Of
course, a single
2009 Apr 17
1
Hijacking threads
From: "Phil Schaffner" <P.R.Schaffner at IEEE.org>
>
> Ed,
>
> I'm sure your contribution would be much appreciated, but please do not
> hijack threads by doing a Reply and changing the subject. Your post
> shows up embedded in the thread due to mail headers that preserve the
> context and messes up threaded mail readers that many people use.
> Please
2007 Aug 31
0
Re: CentOS Digest, Vol 31, Issue 31
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Phil Schaffner <Philip.R.Schaffner at NASA.gov>
To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:57:18 -0400
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NFS Question and answers
On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 18:38 +0530, Rohit Rai wrote:
> HI! Friends,
>
> in followup to my last article regarding my experiences with setting
> up
2016 Apr 07
0
Suddenly increased my hard disk
On 4/7/2016 12:04 AM, Chandran Manikandan wrote:
> Still no luck .
> I have tried your commands in root folder.
> It's showing max size 384 only in home directory.
>
> But if i try df -h shown 579.
>
> Is there any way to find out recycle bin folder
Linux shell has no such thing as a recycle bin, thats a windows thing
(some linux graphical desktops might create one in
2016 Apr 07
1
Suddenly increased my hard disk
Hi John,
Thank you.
For my system shows like below.
df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda2 909G 576G 287G 67% /
tmpfs 3.9G 0 3.9G 0% /dev/shm
/dev/sda1 3.9G 160M 3.5G 5% /boot
/dev/sdb1 916G 382G 488G 44% /bkhdd
First hard disk /dev/sda
Second hard disk /dev/sdb
The problem is in first hard disk show above size but my email
2011 Apr 22
0
QT and oprofile on Centos Linux 5.5
Philip Schaffner, Thank you for your reply. I guess we will have to wait until Centos 6 arrives to get a working QT. Did you see Nicolas Thierry-Mieg's response regarding yum install oprofile-gui. We were able to install oprofile-guii.i386 0:0.9.4-15.el5.centos and oprofile.i386 0.0.9.4.15.el.5.centos. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was
2017 Jul 17
0
Power Down ESXi before SAN
On Sun, 16 Jul 2017, Mike Schaffner wrote:
> I have 2 APC UPS systems, one is connected to my ESXi host and the other
> to my FreeNAS.?? The battery for the FreeNAS will run out before the
> battery for the ESXi, so I need ESXi to shutdown first.?? If I wait
> until BatteryLow on ESXI, it will be too late as FreeNAS will have
> already shutdown.?? How can I change the
2009 Sep 16
0
Skype Wiki procedure is broken.
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Skype
Links to the Skype RPM are broken. Inserted a warning on the page.
Phil
--
Philip R. Schaffner, RTD/ESB Phone: (757)864-1809
NASA/Langley Research Center, MS 473 FAX: (757)864-7891
8 North Dryden Street, B1299, Room 109 WWW:
Hampton, VA 23681-2199 http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/aero/avsafe/iifd/
2005 Aug 05
0
US Federal Government to require MSIE for copyrightpreregistration
Doesn't this constitute government sponsorship of a religon?
-----Original Message-----
From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On
Behalf Of Phil Schaffner
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 7:36 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] US Federal Government to require MSIE for
copyrightpreregistration
The following OT thread from fedora-list may be of some
2007 Nov 19
1
Dual boot box: WinXP & CentOS 5: Impossible torestoreWinXP?
I wouldn't necessarily wipe the whole HD, just the windows partition.
You could also use Xen in CentOS 5 for your Windows virtualization. I'd wait for 5.1 though which will be more refined then version 5.
I've been thinking of setting up a Xen machine of my own with a Windows HVM and a couple of Linux PVMs with their GUIs/consoles pinned to different virtual consoles. It has always
2013 Apr 12
1
after snapshot-delete, the qcow2 image file size doesn't decrease
After snapshot-delete, the qcow2 image file size doesn't decrease, isn't
that a waste of disk space?
Would someone please tell me how to decrease the file size when
snapshot-delete, if that's possible?
The image file name of my virtual machine is d0.qcow
As follows:
[root at test1 ]# virsh list
Id Name State
2006 Feb 11
2
FW: Unable to update
Thanks for the quick response!
Here is my yum.repos.d ->
[base]
name=CentOS-$releasever - Base
baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/
gpgcheck=1
gpgkey=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-centos4
#released updates
[update]
name=CentOS-$releasever - Updates
baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/updates/$basearch/
gpgcheck=1
2006 May 11
5
Issue with hard links, please help!
Hello,
Sometimes when creating hard links to the rsync destination directory,
it seems like the new directory (created from the cp -al command) ends
up with all the data. This causes a problem in the sense that if the
rsync destination directory had 21GB, after the cp -al command, it ends
up having only 8mb, then the rsync source directory determines that it
now requires 21.98GB to update the
2001 Apr 06
2
Samba-2.2.0alpha-3 and smbmount
Hi All,
When I use smbmount to attach a NT 4 Server's drive C:, I use
the following command:
smbmount //inet_server_1/C$ /mnt/server1 -o
username=xxxxxx,password=xxxxxx,fmask=700,dmask=700,nosuid,noexec
now, if I am su'd to root, and do a df -h I get:
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda1 6.7G 2.5G 3.8G 39% /
//inet_server_1/C$ 7.8G 3.2G
2006 Dec 01
2
/var goes read-only
This is an issue that I have been having with one of our production servers
for a couple of months, just out of no where /var goes to read only.
There aren't any errors that show up in /var/log/messages nor dmesg, I
checked to make sure that the drives on error option is set to continue and
there isn't anything as far as I can tell wrong with the disks. Also there
is plenty of disk space.