similar to: What could be on udp:48152

Recently we have been having a lot of trouble with time synchronisation between our samba DC and the domain clients. We are not sure what started this issue since the Samba domain went live on October 11, 2016 and the issues only began to surface this past January but at some point the time on the clients and the DC diverged enough that we began to get strange network errors. Once we figured out

Hi Everyone, my first foray into Samba and AD both. Not sure if this is an OS or configuration problem. I've found similar issues, but nothing either recent enough (is related to samba 3) or close enough. FreeBSD-10.1-RELENG, Samba 4.2.2. I have the domain provisioned as rfc2307 I have joined a Win7-virtual machine to the domain I have created a new user with ADUC I have assigned 10000 to

On 11/07/15 10:16, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 11/07/15 04:06, Lee Brown wrote: >> Hi Everyone, my first foray into Samba and AD both. >> >> Not sure if this is an OS or configuration problem. I've found similar >> issues, but nothing either recent enough (is related to samba 3) or >> close >> enough. >> >> FreeBSD-10.1-RELENG, Samba 4.2.2.

>>> > Considering any editing/buffering benefits are only marginal (AFAIK) there are not benefits with the current approach.On the other hand the list of potential problems includes: > 1) We cannot use the ubiquitous EFI PXEbc protocol forcing us to rely on the (not always present) EFI Binding Services. > Best,Patrick Speaking utterly ignorantly here... could this switch help

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Patrick Masotta <masottaus at yahoo.com> wrote: > >> Yes I know what you mean; >> "I think" the handle of the running image (our code) has a "path" telling us where >> was laded from. That would solve this thing. > > I just

>_ There >have been some patches already merged after 6.03. >Unfortunately, currently there is no _official_ >git repository *publicly* available / > accessible that would contain such patches. > So bad; Any chance to get access to an updated git repository? it takes long time debugging this kind of things. > _ The official Syslinux 6.03 uses a one-year-old (ATM) gnu-efi

I'd spent hours with Google trying to find how to control a separate software package from R via a UDP interface (I could run the package under a "system" command, but that was too slow). I finally figured out a way to communicate with UDP through R, and it works fine (using the "system" command) - it's also fast. (1) install software "socat" (available

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm using tinc to connect a couple of ipv6 capable machines using a mix of upd6, udp4, tcp6 and tcp4. Now I wanted to add an linux embedded device, which has no ipv6 support at all. Tinc did compile and configuration is fine (tested on other machine), but after connecting the embedded device to other hosts tinc instances, it suddenly crashes.

>>>>>I do not understand.Are we parsing a configuration file and potentially >>starting new TFTP transfers while downloading it? How can we do this on >>a single thread?We cannot stop/resume a TFTP transfer then I cannot >>imagine how to detect an INCLUDE during TFTP transfer N to launch TFTP >>transfer N+1 if TFTP transfer N is not finished yet, all in a

Dear W.D. Do you understand that by adding the rules into kernel space numbered from zero to sixty five thousand five hundred thirty four you may alter the behavior of the rule number sixty five thousand five hundred thirty five can you please define and list the goals you are trying to achieve by altering default rule in the terms you can both explain and understand. ----- Original Message

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Patrick Masotta <masottaus at yahoo.com> wrote: >>>> > Commit 23b2707 should resolve this. Please > let me know if you need > test binaries > > -- > -Gene > <<< > > > 1) About the Service Binding protocols, PXE protocol, etc having the same handle# is clear if we > see that the number is in fact

All: I'm posting this to FreeBSD-security (rather than FreeBSD-net) because the problems I'm seeing appear to have been caused by spyware, and because they constitute a possible avenue for denial of service on FreeBSD machines with default installs of the operating system. Several of the FreeBSD machines on our network began to act strangely during the past week. Some have started to

> > Hi there, > I have experienced problems on HP Elitebook 2560p and 8460p > latest firmware installed: > 2560p 68SSU ver. F50. 08/04/2014 > 8460p 68SCF ver. F50. 08/04/2014 > > > PXE boot, syslinux.efi gets perfectly TFTP transferred, it nevers asks for ldlinux.e64, and immediately gives up. > > I have traced the problem to: > >

Hi peeps, After compiling ipfw into the new 6.2 kernel, and typing "ipfw list", all I get is: "65535 deny ip from any to any" From reading the docs, this might indicate that this is the default rule. (I am certainly protected this way--but can't be very productive ;^) ) By the way, when I run "man ipfw" I get nothing. Using this instead:

Hi there, I have experienced problems on HP Elitebook 2560p and 8460p latest firmware installed: 2560p 68SSU ver. F50. 08/04/2014 8460p 68SCF ver. F50. 08/04/2014 PXE boot, syslinux.efi gets perfectly TFTP transferred, it nevers asks for ldlinux.e64, and immediately gives up. I have traced the problem to: /syslinux-6.03/efi/udp.c\core_udp_open()

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Patrick Masotta via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: >>>>> > website (meaning, HP could test their firmware to be compatible with > Syslinux and with non-Windows OSes). If the HP firmware could be made > (more) compliant with UEFI specs, or if it could be improved and still > be compliant with UEFI specs, wouldn't

I compiled the 3.0.21a samba software with the following configure options: configure --prefix=/opt/samba --exec-prefix=/opt/samba --with-krb=/usr/krb5 --with-smbwrapper --with-syslog --with-mandir=/usr/man --with-winbind Everything compiled fine; however, I am unable to see the server on the microsoft network. My smb.conf file looks like the this: [global] workgroup = CAREMARKRX

Hi all Bear with me on this one... We have a problem connecting to a specific port via Oracle TNSPING There are two PC's in our office that are on the same network as the server (i.e. my desktop PC can not get to the server) The server has multiple network interfaces, the primary is a gigabit fibre card on IP xx.16. The secondary is a megabit card on IP xx.80 The tnsping command fails

On 11/07/15 04:06, Lee Brown wrote: > Hi Everyone, my first foray into Samba and AD both. > > Not sure if this is an OS or configuration problem. I've found similar > issues, but nothing either recent enough (is related to samba 3) or close > enough. > > FreeBSD-10.1-RELENG, Samba 4.2.2. > > I have the domain provisioned as rfc2307 > I have joined a Win7-virtual

win2k/XP clients can access this fine, but not NT clients. Samba is listening on the netbios-dgm/ns ports and there's no packet filtering: udp4 0 0 atarashii.netbios-dgm *.* udp4 0 0 atarashii.netbios-ns *.* udp4 0 0 *.netbios-dgm *.* udp4 0 0 *.netbios-ns *.*