similar to: simulation\bootstrap of list factors

Hi, Im testing with 1.1RC1. I read here: http://wiki.dovecot.org/Quota/Maildir "If you configure quota limits in Dovecot (e.g. quota=maildir:storage=102400(kilobytes)), Dovecot makes sure that this header is kept up to date. If the file does not exist, it's simply rebuilt." This is my query: password_query = SELECT username as user, username as userdb_user, passwd as password,

When I add the --with-pam option in my configure command I get the following error: checking for pam_start in -lpam... no configure: error: Can't build with PAM support: libpam not found PAM is most certainly installed on the machine: ii libpam-modules 0.79-5 Pluggable Authentication Modules for PAM ii libpam-runtime 0.79-5 Runtime support

Hi, We run 1.1.3 and I use Outlook to connect to my IMAP box and a couple of times per day (randomly) when I click certain folders IMAP will start retrieving ALL headers for that folder again ('retrieving new headers')! I don't understand this. What triggers IMAP to do so, why not just retrieve only the NEW headers? Is it Dovecot or Outlook (probably) and what can be done

Dear all, Let's say I have the following: # Loading the boot package # install.packages(boot) library(boot) # Generating data set.seed(123) x <- rnorm(100) # Bootstrap for the sample mean bmean <- boot(x, function(x,d) mean(x[d]), R=1000) bmean # #ORDINARY NONPARAMETRIC BOOTSTRAP # # #Call: #boot(data = x, statistic = function(x, d) mean(x[d]), R = 1000) # # #Bootstrap Statistics : #

Dear list, I have this problem, please your advice. I have list A that contains two matrix elements: [[1]] a b [1,] 2 1 [2,] 3 2 [3,] 3 2 [[2]] c d [1,] 3 5 [2,] 3 1 [3,] 2 3 and list B, that also contains 2 matrices: [[1]] e f g [1,] 1 20 30 [2,] 2 40 50 [3,] 3 60 70 [4,] 4 80 90 [5,] 5 100 110 [[2]] h i j [1,] 1 10 20 [2,] 2 20 30 [3,] 3 30 40 [4,] 4 40 50

Hi, I just finished setting up a functional design with Dovecot+Sieve and it works like a charm. However I'm having serious doubts about the scalability of this. Here is part of a discussion we're having here: About Dovecot+Sieve. What happens here is that your MTA is configured to pass _all_ email to Dovecot which is configured as a LDA. In practice this means this in the Exim

hello, i need to calculate ci's for each of 4 groups within a dataset, to be able to infere about differences in the variable "similarity". the problem is that data within groups is dependent, as assigned by the blocking-factor "site". my guess was to use a block bootstrap but samples within in these blocks / sites are not of same length. i was not able to find a method to

I have written a short script to estimate the size of a test of non-constant mean in an AR(1) time series. When I run the simulation on my PC (R version 2.7.1), I get the expected result: an empirical size much larger than the nominal size. On the Red Hat machine (R version 2.7.2) in my department, however, I get p-values > .45 for every simulated test. Below is my simulation code (uses

Dear forum users, It's 3:35am and I am swamped with statistics homework lol I'm terrible with R and this time I have no idea what the prof wants. Here is the question: Consider the (two-??sample) Wilcoxon rank statistic T = ?rank(Xi). For n1=106 and n2=192, determine by simulation the ?=.05 critical point for testing H0: ?=0, H1:?<0. We can do this as follows: For m=10000 (no wimpy

Okay, here is a more complete example: sample_sizes<- matrix(c(10,10,10,25,25,25,25,50,25,100,50,25,50,100,100,25,100,100), nrow=2) # see what it looks like sample_sizes ssds<-c(4,4.4,5,6,8) nssds<-length(ssds) results<-list() # first loop steps through the sample for(ss in 1:dim(sample_sizes)[2]) { # get the two sample sizes ss1<-sample_sizes[1,ss] ss2<-sample_sizes[2,ss]

hi, i am new in this field. do favorite<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/36404707/simulation-study-of-2-sample-test-on-different-combination-of-factors#> If I wish to conduct a simulation on the robustness of two sample test by using R language, is that any ways in writing the code? There are several factors (sample sizes-(10,10),(10,25),(25,25),(25,50),(25,100),50,25),(50,100),

Wow! I'm running 1.1 Beta 1 on OpenSuSE linux 10.2. It seems not bad at all. The only thing I've not quite well understood is this message, that pops up when I start dovecot: Warning: fd limit 1024 is lower than what Dovecot can use under full load (more than 1536). Either grow the limit or change login_max_processes_count and max_mail_processes settings Where does dovecot take this 1024

I have an courier IMAP server running. To get sib dirs working I had to rename them all to begin with a period ".". e.g Maildir Maildir/{cur,new,tmp} Maildir/.account1/{cur,new,tmp} Maildir/.account2/{cur,new,tmp} Maildir/.account3/{cur,new,tmp} etc If I uninstall Courier and install dovecot, will these "period" dirs be seen by default? I am fairly new to this and

You have quite a few mistakes in your example. The code below works for me - you can wrap it in a function if you like. I think you will need a lot more practice before you can write something like this in R as you are missing close braces and haven't really worked out the difference between the number of calculations you are doing for each replication and the number of replications. It takes

Hi all Forgive me, I'm a total R newbie, and this seems to be a straightforward simple bootstrap problem, but after a whole day of trying to figure out how to do it I'm ready to give up. Part of the problem is that every example and every help page seems to be about doing something more far more complex. I'm got a table with 40 columns and 750 rows. I sum all the values across the

I would like to see those of us who send an inquiry to this list also send a summary of what fixed the problem so that someone in the future could find the answer. I searched archives for an answer and only found questions. Since a lot of folks reply ot individuals then even the replies don't end up in the archives and so it would be nice if summaries were sent to the list. Anyway, enough

Hi, i think i have figured the purpose of using this index (i-1)*5+j in the previous example that you gave. It is because that i have to consider the outer loop and inner loop also... so the iterative for i need to minus one because it have ran one times simulation already ,then times the number of sizes of inner loop, then plus the iterative of j.... then for the simulation, i think there will

I'm getting "Maximum number of mail processes exceeded" messages when 512 imap Processes are active. Dovecot reports: Warning: fd limit 1024 is lower than what Dovecot can use under full load (more than 1712). Either grow the limit or change login_max_processes_count and max_mail_processes settings But in my /var/service/dovecot/run script I use: #!/bin/sh mkdir /var/core chmod

Hi all, I would like to run a function with several nested conditions, which are completely factorial. The input data (x1) has two different sample sizes, so: x1 <- dat1 x1 <- dat2 Then a can have 3 different values: a <- 0.15 a <- 0.35 a <- 0.50 Then b can have 2 different values: b <- data.matrix (c(0.5,0.5,0.5)) b <- data.matrix (c(0.2,0.4,0.6)) Then d can have 5

hi together, there is a problem with my sieve: System SuSE 10.3 with Postfix in Postfix i have add to main.cf mailbox_command = /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf is add: protocol lda { # Address to use when sending rejection mails. postmaster_address = carsten at chatlabel.de ... # Enabling Sieve plugin for server-side mail filtering mail_plugins =