similar to: Strange error with log-normal models

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Strange error with log-normal models"

2003 Aug 05
1
error message in fitdistr
Hi R lovers Here is a numerical vector test > test [1] 206 53 124 112 92 77 118 75 48 176 90 74 107 126 99 84 114 147 99 114 99 84 99 99 99 99 99 104 1 159 100 53 [33] 132 82 85 106 136 99 110 82 99 99 89 107 99 68 130 99 99 110 99 95 153 93 136 51 103 95 99 72 99 50 110 37 [65] 102 104 92 90 94 99 76 81 109 91 98 96 104 104 93 99 125 89
2012 Feb 21
3
HELP ERROR Weibull values must be > 0
GUYS, I NEED HELP WITH ERROR: library(MASS) > dados<-read.table("mediaRGinverno.txt",header=FALSE) > vento50<-fitdistr(dados[[1]],densfun="weibull") Erro em fitdistr(dados[[1]], densfun = "weibull") : Weibull values must be > 0 WHY RETURN THIS ERROR? WHAT CAN I DO? BEST REGARDS [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2013 Jan 22
2
Assistant
Good-day Sir, I am R.Language users but am try to? estimate parameter of beta distribution particular dataset but give this error, which is not clear to me: (Initial value in "vmmin" is not finite) beta.fit <- fitdistr(data,densfun=dbeta,shape1=value , shape2=value) kindly assist. expecting your reply:
2010 Mar 08
1
lapply and list indexing basics (after realizing I wasn't previously subscribed...sorry)
I have split my original dataframe to generate a list of dataframes each of which has 3 columns of factors and a 4th column of numeric data. I would like to use lapply to apply the fitdistr() function to only the 4th column (x$isi) of the dataframes in the list. Is there a way to do this or am I misusing lapply? As a second solution I tried splitting only the numeric data column to yield a
2009 Nov 20
2
How to use results of distribution fitting for further processing?
This is probably simple, but I have a hard time finding the solution. Any help greatly appreciated.   I would like to use the results of fitdistr(z,densfun=dweibull,start=list(scale=1,shape=1)) for further processing.  How do I assign the values of scale and shape to b and a without manually entering the numbers?   TIA __________________________________________________________________
2010 Mar 08
1
lapply and list indexing basics
I have split my original dataframe to generate a list of dataframes each of which has 3 columns of factors and a 4th column of numeric data. I would like to use lapply to apply the fitdistr() function to only the 4th column (x$isi) of the dataframes in the list. Is there a way to do this or am I misusing lapply? As a second solution I tried splitting only the numeric data column to yield a list
2003 Jul 25
5
named list 'start' in fitdistr
Hi R lovers! I'd like to know how to use the parameter 'start' in the function fitdistr() obviously I have to provide the initial value of the parameter to optimize except in the case of a certain set of given distribution Indeed according to the help file for fitdistr " For the following named distributions, reasonable starting values will be computed if `start'
2011 May 03
3
fitting distributions using fitdistr (MASS)
Please guide me through to resolve the error message that I get this is what i have done. >x1<- rnorm(100,2,1) >x1fitbeta<-fitdistr(x1,"beta") Error in fitdistr(x1, "beta") : 'start' must be a named list Yes, I do understand that sometime for the distribution to converge to the given set of data, it requires initial parameters of the distribution, to
2005 Nov 17
1
Problem with fitdistr for gamma in R 2.2.0
Dear R developers, I have encountered strange behaviour of fitdistr for gamma in recent R build i.e. 2.2.0. I have attached the code for data at the end of this mail so you can reproduce the problem. In short, I am able to run fitdistr under 2.1.0 without problems, while I get the following error under 2.2.0 (Version 2.2.0 Patched (2005-11-15 r36348)) > fitdistr(otm, "gamma") Error
2005 Sep 06
2
(no subject)
my problem actually arised with fitting the data to the weibulldistribution, where it is hard to see, if the proposed parameterestimates make sense. data1:2743;4678;21427;6194;10286;1505;12811;2161;6853;2625;14542;694;11491; ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? 14924;28640;17097;2136;5308;3477;91301;11488;3860;64114;14334 how am I supposed to know what starting values i have to take? i get different
2005 Apr 05
1
Fitdistr and likelihood
Hi all, I'm using the function "fitdistr" (library MASS) to fit a distribution to given data. What I have to do further, is getting the log-Likelihood-Value from this estimation. Is there any simple possibility to realize it? Regards, Carsten
2012 Feb 23
3
why is generating the same graph???
Hi, why my script iss always generating the same graph?when I change the parameters and the name of text file? library(MASS) dados<-read.table("inverno.txt",header=FALSE) vento50<-fitdistr(dados[[1]],densfun="weibull") png(filename="invernoRG.png",width=800,height=600) hist(dados[[1]], seq(0, 18, 0.5), prob=TRUE, xlab="Velocidade
2010 Jan 12
1
Strange behavior when trying to piggyback off of "fitdistr"
Hello. I am not certain even how to search the archives for this particular question, so if there is an obvious answer, please smack me with a large halibut and send me to the URLs. I have been experimenting with fitting curves by using both maximum likelihood and maximum spacing estimation techniques. Originally, I have been writing distribution-specific functions in 'R' which work
2008 Oct 07
3
Fitting weibull, exponential and lognormal distributions to left-truncated data.
Dear All, I have two questions regarding distribution fitting. I have several datasets, all left-truncated at x=1, that I am attempting to fit distributions to (lognormal, weibull and exponential). I had been using fitdistr in the MASS package as follows: fitdistr<-(x,"weibull") However, this does not take into consideration the truncation at x=1. I read another posting in this
2012 Feb 21
5
help error: In dweibull(x, shape, scale, log) : NaNs produzidos
Guys, I'm having an error when I use the command: library(MASS)> dados<-read.table("inverno.txt",header=FALSE)> vento50<-fitdistr(dados[[1]],densfun="weibull")Mensagens de aviso perdidas:1: In dweibull(x, shape, scale, log) : NaNs produzidos2: In dweibull(x, shape, scale, log) : NaNs produzidos3: In dweibull(x, shape, scale, log) : NaNs produzidos4: In
2002 Aug 06
2
Estimating Weibull parameters
Hi R-Community, I have a vector of Weibull distributed observations and I would like to estimate the parameters "shape" and "scale" of the Weibull distribution. Is there a way to do this in R? Much thanks in advance, Hagen Schm?ller -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Dipl.-Ing. Hagen K. Schm?ller Institut f?r Elektrische Anlagen und
2008 Sep 19
0
Re lative Novice ? "Can I get some explanation of the docs for fitdistr(MASS)?"
In the docs I see: Usage fitdistr(x, densfun, start, ...) Arguments x A numeric vector. densfun Either a character string or a function returning a density evaluated at its first argument. Distributions "beta", "cauchy", "chi-squared", "exponential", "f", "gamma", "geometric", "log-normal", "lognormal",
2011 Jun 07
1
R results explanation
Hi all, this might be a stupid question, but still. Everytime i find some new function it's prettty easy to understand how to use the syntax and to perform a text. Even the general idea of what the function does is pretty easy to understand, but i can not find an explanation (detailed explanation) of the R output for each function. For example, a function fitdistr() in MASS package i
2005 Jan 31
2
ML-Fit for truncated distributions
Hello, maybe that my Question is a "beginner"-Question, but up to now, my research didn't bring any useful result. I'm trying to fit a distribution (e.g. lognormal) to a given set of data (ML-Estimation). I KNOW about my data that there is a truncation for all data below a well known threshold. Is there an R-solution for an ML-estimation for this kind of data-problem? As
2008 Feb 22
1
fitting a lognormal distribution using cumulative probabilities
Dear all, I'm trying to estimate the parameters of a lognormal distribution fitted from some data. The tricky thing is that my data represent the time at which I recorded certain events. However, in many cases I don't really know when the event happened. I' only know the time at which I recorded it as already happened. Therefore I want to fit the lognormal from the cumulative