similar to: Creating a GUI based workflow

Is there a text mining/ NLP package in R that could do text summarization? For example, take a huge text as input and provide a summary of the text. In package tm, summarization is defined more as high frequency terms which is not what I want. I actually want a summary of what is present in the huge volume of text. Any help on a R package would be helpful. Thank you. Ravi -- View this message

Is there any project or solution for an easy integration of a WFE / WfMS into rails? I''m quite new to this topic, but I probably need a small subset of workflow patterns (or whatever the correct term is) only. Any pointers are welcome. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hello, I am relativley new to Ruby on Rails and am still in the process of enjoying the features it offers. I wanted to know if theres workflow support in rails. Can some one give me pointers if its possible. Thanks Naveen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060305/43c9abc3/attachment.html

Hi all, I have recently given commit access to LLVM and successfully pushed a test commit from my local master branch. However, I can’t find which is the recommended workflow for committing more serious stuff using git alone. I have read the docs but everything seems to still require svn before bridging to github. I want to use git alone to commit a patch that I got reviewed. I currently have

Hi Hiroshi, Thanks for that. I find “rebase” difficult to use. Maybe I don’t understand it, but it always causes a lot ‘conflicts’ that are very hard to fix according to my experience. I have another question though. LLVM requires that reviewed patches are pushed as a /single/ commit with a standardised message, particularly specifying the Differential Revision url as part of the commit message.

Guys, I used Random Forest with a couple of data sets I had to predict for binary response. In all the cases, the AUC of the training set is coming to be 1. Is this always the case with random forests? Can someone please clarify this? I have given a simple example, first using logistic regression and then using random forests to explain the problem. AUC of the random forest is coming out to be

I am looking to build simple GUIs based on the R codes I have. The main objective is to hide the scary R codes from non-programming people and make it easier for them to try out different inputs. For example, 1. The GUI will have means to upload a csv file which will be read by the R code. 2. A button to preprocess data (carried out by a R function behind) 3. A button to build some models

I am using 'tm' package for text mining and facing an issue with finding the frequently occuring terms. From the definition it appears that findFreqTerms and minDocFreq are equivalent commands and both tries to identify the documents with terms appearing more than a specified threshold. However, I am getting drastically different results with both. I have given the results from both the

Greetings, If you dont' care about running debuginfo-tests, and don't maintain a bot that runs debuginfo-tests, you can stop reading. I've uploaded a patch [https://reviews.llvm.org/D39605] that changes the way you run debuginfo-tests. Prior to this patch, the way to run them is to clone an external git repository into clang/test and then debuginfo-tests will happen transparently

Hi All, Ok, just for the matter of providing feedback that may be useful for others, I figured out one way to do it based on the setup that I described earlier. It can be something like this git checkout patchbranch # checkout to the patch branch, this is the one containing the differential patch code git checkout -b tmp # checkout to a new tmp branch git reset —soft master

Hans van Kranenburg writes ("Re: git workflow, redux"): > On 08/23/2018 08:07 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > > I think git-debrebase is going to be easier for all these things than > > the current approach. > > Ok, let's try it! Thanks a lot for doing the above writeup. Great, thanks. (I hope it's OK that I have snipped most of your responses to the discussion,

llvm-profdata is part of llvm though. It’s perfectly fine for something in clang to depend on something in llvm. However, clang and lld are two independent llvm subprojects, neither of which can depend on each other. Generally speaking, from a layering perspective, if A depends on B and C, but B and C are independent, that should be reflected in the structure. For example, in CMake we will need

Hi folks, I've been involved in Syslinux since 14 years and been almost off for many years for multiple reasons. I'm currently trying to recover and while observing the project with a little of distance I noticed the following : - project's activity is pretty low - patches sent to the mailing list (ML) are not likely to be reviewed - Integration workflow is pretty unclear - release

Hi LLVM community, As discussed earlier, we in the clangd land feel that buganizer does not address the clangd's needs as a bug-tracking system. In our previous attempt to raise this on llvm-dev [1] we shared our idea to put the clangd issue tracker on GitHub. The participants raised multiple concerns, including the migration costs, whether GitHub is the right choice as an issue tracker,

I am looking for online courses to learn Spatial Statistics using R. Statistics.com is offering an online course in December on the same topic but that schedule doesn't suit mine. Are there any other similar modes for learning spatial statistics using R??? Can someone please advice??? Thank you. Ravi -- View this message in context:

Let's say I have written the following tiny .Rnw file: _________________________________________ \documentclass{article} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage{Sweave} \usepackage{tikz} \usepackage{pgf} \begin{document} <<>>= sessionInfo() @ \end{document} _________________________________________ I then can go to R and use sweave to translate the .Rnw file into a .tex

Hi all, I've got https://reviews.llvm.org/D37756 up for review currently which simplifies a lot of the logic in our lit config files. For most people, this will be completely transparent and "just work", but it breaks one workflow that people should be aware of. Problem: If you run lit by putting llvm-config in your path and then running <source-root>/utils/lit/lit.py

Hi, I'm asking another one of those questions that would be obvious if I could watch your work while you do it. I'm having trouble understanding the workflow of code and package maintenance. Stage 1. Make some R functions in a folder. This is in a Subversion repo R/trunk/myproject Stage 2. Make a package: After the package.skeleton, and R check, I have a new folder with the project

> On Jan 16, 2015, at 3:26 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+cl at mega-nerd.com> wrote: > > As for all the reason why the LLVM project does not use Git, I wonder > why large complex projects like the Linux kernel, Wine, MinGW-w64, > GHC and many many others don't seem to have any major problems using > Git. Lots of projects are also happy with Mercurial, or BZR, or even

Hello dear R users, Recently there has been several fascinating threads on the website stackoverflow <http://stackoverflow.com> regarding the subject of R WorkFlow best practices: - What best practices do you use for programming in R?<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2258092/what-best-practices-do-you-use-for-programming-in-r> - Workflow for statistical analysis and report