similar to: Remove data 3 standard deviatons from the mean using R?

Hi Andy, Thanks for the explanations. Yes AMDGPU is in-order and has MicroOpBufferSize = 1. Re "issue limited" and instruction groups: could it make sense to disable the generic scheduler's detection of issue limitation on in-order CPUs, or on CPUs that don't define instruction groups, or some similar condition? Something like: --- a/lib/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.cpp +++

Dear all, I cant seem to unsubscribe from the mailing list even though it has removed my account, any tips? Best wishes, Lorna [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

For the following code below, the x-axis ticks are 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 when I was expection them to be 1,2,8,9,10,11,12. Please help me figure out where is the mistake. library(lattice) testdata <- as.data.frame(t(structure(c( 1,2005,9.24,6.18,634, 2,2005,8.65,6.05,96, 8,2004,6.81,6.51,16, 9,2004,9.0,7.29,8, 10,2004,8.84,6.18,524, 11,2004,8.54,6.35,579, 12,2004,9.97,6.3,614, 12,2005,8.75,5.84,32,

Hi, I'm trying to understand why MachineScheduler does a poor job in straight line code in cases like the one in the attached debug dump. This is on AMDGPU, an in-order target, and the problem is that the IMAGE_SAMPLE instructions have very high (80 cycle) latency, but in the resulting schedule they are often placed right next to their uses like this: 1784B %140:vgpr_32 =

Hi... With samba4 I sometimes feel like a bloody beginner even I use samba since ages. Miracle of the day: Users connecting using samba4 cannot write to group writeable folders even they should be able to. I upgraded one 3.6 fileserver to 4.2.3. PDC is always a samba 4.2.3 instance. I am using samba4 in classic PDC mode for a couple of reasons. On my fileserver I have a folder called

Hi All.. Have a question.. For the following r code testdata <- as.data.frame(t(structure(c( "1/1/04","LV1",3.8,2,87, "2/1/04","LV1",3.2,3,28, "3/1/04","LV1",3.4,3,88, "4/1/04","LV1",3,2,26, "5/1/04","LV1",3.8,2,87, "6/1/04","LV1",3.2,3,28,

I have a text string that contains text within two brackets. e.g. "testdata[3]" "testdata[-4]", "testdata[-4g]", I wish to "extract" the string enclosed in brackets? What is a good way to do this? e.g. fun(testdata[3]) = '3' fun(testdata[-4g]) = '-4g' --------------------------------- Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life?

Hello All, I was wondering if it's possible to reshape data from long to wide in R without using a "timevar". I've pasted some sample data below along with some code. The data are sorted by Subject and Drug. I want to transpose the Drug variable into multiple columns in alphabetical order. My data have a variable called "RowNo" that functions almost like a

In playing around with data.frames (and wanting a simple, cheap way to use the variable and case names in plots; but I've solved that with some hacks, yech), I noticed the following behavior with subsetting. testdata <- data.frame(matrix(1:20,nrow=4,ncol=5)) names(testdata) ## expect labels, get them names(testdata[2,]) ## expect labels, get them names(testdata[,2]) ## expect labels, but

Dear all, I have a dataset where the interaction is more than obvious, but I was asked to give a p-value, so I ran a logistic regression using glm. Very funny, in the outcome the interaction term is NOT significant, although that's completely counterintuitive. There are 3 variables : spot (binary response), constr (gene construct) and vernalized (growth conditions). Only for the FLC construct

Sorry guys, but I have another one: I want to write a function that returns a certain column of a dataframe. The function accepts two argument: the dataframe and the name of the column, but the column is not given as a "string" but as a variable name. EXAMPLE ---------------------- > testdata start stop censor groupvar var1 var2 1 0 1 0 1

Hello all, due to unexplained differences between statistical results from collaborators and our lab that arose in the same large proteomics dataset we reevaluated the t.test() function. Here, we found a weird behaviour that is also reproducible in the following small test dataset: Suppose, we have two vectors with numbers and some missing values that refer to the same individuals and that

Hello All, Recently developed the code below for graphing patterns of chemotherapy administration. As someone just starting to use R in their work, I managed to figure out some parts of the code but needed help with others. setwd("N:/Regimen Coding/0906/Plots Test") getwd() TestData <- structure(list(profile_key = c(1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3), line = c(1, 1,

I want to change the way the plot is appearing in the barchart .. testdata <-

Dear Everyone, I am having problems with use of the reshape package's cast function using length as an aggregating function. Unexpectedly, I receive the error: 2 arguments passed to 'length' which requires 1 I don't understand this at all - the data I'm using is very simple, and appears almost identical to that used in the ChickWeight example in the package. The problem can

I posted this on R help, and a few others responded indicating they too were able to replicate the error as a function of missing data. I believe this should not be the case and hence and reporting it here. ### Code provided on R-Help by Ivar Herfindal # Simulate data testdata <- cbind.data.frame(gr=3Drep(letters[1:4], each=3D5), = aa=3Drnorm(20), bb=3Drnorm(20)) # Introduce some missingness

I am having trouble getting standard errors for contrasts using se.contrast() in what appears to be a simple case to me. The following test example illustrates my problem: Lab <- factor(rep(c("1","2","3"),each=12)) Material <- factor(rep(c("A","B","C","D"),each=3,times=3)) Measurement <-

I am new to R. I want to graph group data using a "Traditional Bar Chart with Standard Error Bar", like the kind shown here: http://samiam.colorado.edu/~mcclella/ftep/twoGroups/twoGroupGraphs.html Is there a simple way to do this? So far, I have only figured out how to plot the bars using barplot. testdata <- scan(, list(group=0,xbar=0,se=0)) 400 0.36038 0.02154 200 0.35927

Dear all, I'm trying to replace NA values with -9999 in one column of a data frame. I've tried using is.na and the testdata[testdata$onecolumn==NA] <- 9999 approach, but whilst neither generate errors, neither result in -9999s appearing - the NAs remain there! I'd be grateful for any advice on what I'm doing wrong or any other suitable approaches. Many thanks, Steve

Hi All, For the following code, I'm not sure why the error bars are appearing horizontal. Can someone please tell me how to fix the problem. testdata <-