similar to: Confidence Interval Calculation

Hello, I have the following r-codes for solving a quasilikelihood estimating equation: >library(geepack) >fit<-geese(y~x1+x2+x3,jack=TRUE,id=id,scale.fix=TRUE,data=dat,mean.link = "logit", corstr="independence") Now my question is how can I calculate the confidence interval of the parameters of the above model "fit"? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I have a generalized linear model to solve. I used package "geepack". When I use the correlation structure "unstructured", I get a messeage that- R GUI front-end has stopped working. Why this happens? What is the solution? The r codes are as follows: a<-read.table("d:/bmt.txt",header=T")

Hello, I want to fit a GEE with a user-defined link function. For the user-defined link-function I still read http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/R/Rhelp01/archive/6555.html and http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/R/Rhelp02a/archive/25727.html. Only for testing purposes I added a new link function (corlogit) in make.link (as well as in binomial) with exactly the same code as logit before using my code.

I have a competing risk data where a patient may die from either AIDS or Cancer. I want to compare the cox model for each of the event of interest with a competing risk model. In the competing risk model the cumulative incidence function is used directly. I used the jackknife (pseudovalue) of the cumulative incidence function for each cause (AIDS or Cancer) in a generalized estimating equation. I

Dear R users I am analysing data from a group of twins and their siblings. The measures that we are interested in are all correlated within families, with the correlations being stronger between twins than between non-twin siblings. The measures are all calculated from survey answers and by definition have limited ranges (e.g. -5 to +5), though within the range they are approximately normally

Hi A quick question. Standard errors reported by gee/yags differs from the ones in geeglm (geepack). require(gee) require(geepack) require(yags) mm <- gee(breaks ~ tension, id=wool, data=warpbreaks, corstr="exchangeable") mm2 <- geeglm(breaks ~ tension, id=wool, data=warpbreaks, corstr="exchangeable", std.err = "san.se") mm3 <- yags(breaks ~

I have included data at the bottom of this email. It can be read in by highlighting the data and then using this command: dat <- read.table("clipboard", header = TRUE,sep="\t") I can obtain solutions with both of these: library(gee) fit.gee<-gee(score ~ chem + time, id=id, family=gaussian,corstr="exchangeable",data=dat) and library(yags) fit.yags <-

Hi, I downloaded both gee and geepack, and I am trying to understand the differences between the two libraries. I used the same data and estimated the same model, with a correlation structure autoregressive of order 1. Surprisingly for me, I found very different results. Coefficients are slightly different in value but sometimes opposite in sign. Moreover, the estimate of rho (correlation

Hi, having used both the gee pacakge and the geepack package, i am unsure of how to interpret the results. Here are the results from the geeglm function from the geepack package > gee2<-geeglm(data$erythema~data$product, data = data, id=subject, > family=binomial, corstr="independence") Warning message: In model.response(mf, "numeric") : using

Hi, I am trying to fit a ordinal GEE model using ordgee {geepack}. In order to check the validity of the function, I specified the correlation structure as independence (i.e. constr = "independence") and compared the result with that using polr {MASS}. Because a GEE model with an independent working correlation structure is equivalent to an ordinary GLM model, we would expect the same

We are currently analyzing data on children clustered in day care-centers (DCC). We have tried to use geepack and gee libraries to estimate an overall incidence rate for absences (=number of absences/risk time) by specifying geese(number.absences ~ offset(log(risktime)), id=day.care.id, family=poisson("log"), data=dcc, corstr="exch",

This is a summary and extension of the thread "GLMM (lme4) vs. glmmPQL output" http://maths.newcastle.edu.au/~rking/R/help/04/01/0180.html In the new revision (#Version: 0.4-7) of lme4 the standard errors are close to those of the 4 other methods. Thanks to Douglas Bates, Saikat DebRoy for the revision, and to G?ran Brostr?m who run a simulation. In response to my first posting, Prof.

Dear all, We have got data (response and predictor variables) for each country of the world; I started by fitting standard GLM and tested for spatial correlation using variogram models (geoR) fitted to the residuals of the GLM. Spatial autocorrelation is significant. Therefore, I think about using general estimation equations (geeglm or geese in geepack) allowing for residual spatial

Hi, I'm running GEE using geepack. I set corstr = "ar1" as below: > m.ar <- geeglm(L ~ O + A, + data = firstgrouptxt, id = id, + family = binomial, corstr = "ar1") > summary(m.ar) Call: geeglm(formula = L ~ O + A, family = binomial, data = firstgrouptxt, id = id, corstr = "ar1") Coefficients:

Dear all, Is it possible to incorporate a nested design in GEE? I have measurements on trees that where measured in two years. The trees are nested in plots. Each plot contains 24 trees. The number of plots is 72. Hence we would expect 2 * 24 * 72 = 3456 data points. A few are missing, so we end up wih 3431 data points. This is what I have tried until now. #assuming independence between trees

event.nab.2 is 0/1 and I dichotomized va to get va.2 to see if I could get geeglm to work. glm has no problem with the data but geeglm chokes. Each subject (patient.id) has at most 2 observations and more than 3/4 of the subjects have 2 observations. I have even worse problems trying to use glmmPQL from MASS and worse still trying to use lmer from lme4. But I figured a marginal model would work.

Hello Fellow R Users,I have spent the last week trying to find a work around to this problem and I can't seem to solve it. I simply want to plot my GEE model result with 95% confidence bands. I am using the geepack package to run a basic GEE model involving nestling weights, to a Gaussian distribution, with "exchangeable" error structure. I am examining how nestling weight varies

Dear all, I need to fit a gee model with an auto-regressive correlation structure and I faced some problems. I attach a simple example: ####################################################### library(gee) library(geepack) # I SIMULATE DATA FROM POISSON DISTRIBUTION, 10 OBS FOR EACH OF 50 GROUPS set.seed(1) y <- rpois(500,50) x <- rnorm(500) id <- rep(1:50,each=10) # EXAMPLES FOR

Hello Everybody: I am searching for an R package for fitting Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) with weights (i.e. Weighted Estimating Equations). From the R documentation I found "geese(geepack)" for fitting Generalized Estimating Equations. In this documentation, under the paragraph “weights” it has been written, “an optional vector of weights to be used in the fitting process.

Hi all, I am trying to do a generalized estimating equation (GEE) with the "geepack" package and I am not 100% sure what exactly the "id" argument means. It seems to be an important argument because results differ considerably defining different clusters. I have a data set of counts (poisson distribution): numbers of butterfly species counted every month during a period of