similar to: GnuPG 1.2.3 vulnerable?

Hi there, Is there some way to configure ipfw to do traffic normalizing ("scrubbing", as in ipf for OpenBSD)? Is there any tool to do it for FreeBSD firewalling? I've heard that ipf was ported on current, anything else? TIA, /Dorin. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want. http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools

>> 3. I'm intrested in blocking kazaa/P2P trafic with IPFW any help in this issue you could possibly block connections at known p2p ports. deny tcp from any to any 6699 step but most of the newer protocols use dynamic ports and in turn, are configurable. so ipfw isn't exactly ideal on it's own for this. -r. -----Original Message----- From: Pons [mailto:pons@gmx.li] Sent:

Hi, all I am studying the ogg-vorbis algorithm but I have less knowledge about the codebook structure of vorbis. After tracing the release source code, I found it doesn't use huffman tree to decode the huffman code instead of using a special mapping and pre-look. The memory requirement seems similar with huffman tree decoding. Could anyone tell me how the vorbis huffman decoding works

Hi According to vorbis I spec, there are several configurations. There are 2 formats of floor, 3 formats of residue and 3 look up types of VQ codebook, etc. I think to get all kinds of vorbis file with these configurations but what I have got from network only support some of the formats (Ex. floor1, residue 1 & 2, VQ lookup type0 & 1). I downloaded several freeware vorbis encoder

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Celelibi <celelibi at gmail.com> wrote: >> And (a bit out of scope) if I get my old kernel to boot in EFI mode, >> will the driver efivars have access to the EFI variables? Or does the >> kernel need to be recompiled specially for EFI? > > Doubtful.

Dear all, I found that the plotmath seems won't work on xlab in plot (and other plot functions including matplot, contour, ...): > plot(1:10, 1:10, xlab=expression(alpha)) the plot shows nothing for x-label. My R-version is R.1.1.0 > version _ platform Windows arch x86 os Win32 system x86, Win32 status major 1

Hello all! I found a little bug in the rsync v3.0.2 install, that is if you separate the build (output) folder from the source folder, the man files fail to install because they are generated in the output folder, but the install target searches them in the source folder. I attach a small patch that solves this problem. Thanks all, Ciprian Craciun. P.S.: I'm not on the

-- On Friday, November 21, 2003 12:48 PM -0800 "David Wolfskill - david@catwhisker.org" <+freebsd-security+openmacnews+0459602105.david#catwhisker.org@spamgourmet.com> wrote: David, thanks for your reply! >> i've been struggling with setting appropriate rules for an SMTP-server >> behind by NAT'd firewall. > > OK.... <snip> > >>

I have searched for this topic on the mailing list and on Google without finding anything. Is this already a well known issue? The problem is that rsync does not preserve ext2-4 attributes (even when using the -a, -A, and -X flags). Note that these are different from extended attributes: Extended attributes are manipulated using programs such as getfattr and setfattr (on Unix-like systems),

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 GnuPG's ElGamal signing keys compromised ========================================== Summary ======= Phong Nguyen identified a severe bug in the way GnuPG creates and uses ElGamal keys for signing. This is a significant security failure which can lead to a compromise of almost all ElGamal keys used for signing. Note that

On Fri 2015-06-12 01:52:54 -0400, Mark D. Baushke wrote: > I have communicated with Allen Roginsky on this topic and I have been given permission to post his response. > > In this message below, the 'vendor' was Darren Tucker's generated prime > that used a generator value of 5. > > -- Mark > > From: "Roginsky, Allen" <allen.roginsky at

I am not sure if I had a compromise but I am not sure I wanted some other input. I noticed in this in my daily security run output: pc1 setuid diffs: 19c19 < 365635 -rwsr-xr-x 1 root wheel 204232 Sep 27 21:23:19 2003 /usr/X11R6/bin/xscreensaver --- > 365781 -rwsr-xr-x 1 root wheel 205320 Dec 4 07:55:59 2003 /usr/X11R6/bin/xscreensaver It was the only file listed and I didn't

(I think the subject is quite descriptive; however for use-cases and details see bellow after the mention of the old conversation and the patch.) Searching the mailing list about this topic yields an old conversation about this from 2008: * https://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2008-November/022148.html * https://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2008-November/022150.html I'll quote

Dear r-help, ¬°¤°»ò¤@¯ë¤H¹ï¤k¥Íªº¨èªO¦L¶H´N¬O·Å¬X¡Bµ½Åé¤H·N¡B»y¨¥¯à¤O±j¡F ¦Ó¬Û¹ï¦a»{¬°¨k¥Í«h¤ñ¸û«i´±¡B½Ä°Ê¡B¦n¦â¡BªÅ¶¡·P¡B¤è¦V·P¨Î¡H §A¬O§_´¿¸gÃhºÃ¹L¡A ³o¨Ç¨èªO¦L¶H¤¤ªº¨â©Ê®t²§¨s³º¬O¨k¤k¨â©Ê¦b¥Í²zµo®i¤W»P¥Í­Ñ¨Óªº¤£¦P¿ò¶Ç¦]¤l©Ò³y¦¨ªº¡A ©Î¬O«á¤Ñªº±Ð¾i»P¤å¤Æ©Ò«¬¶ì¥X¨Óªº¡H ¦Ó¤£¦P¤å¤Æ¤¤¹ï¨k¤l®ð·§»P¤k©Ê¯S½è©Î¦h©Î¤Öªº±j½Õ»P­«µø¡A ¤S©M³o¼Ëªº¨èªO¦L¶H¦³¤°»òÃö«Y©O¡H

Hello, We have upgraded from Dovecot 2.2.13 to 2.2.15 and we are using global ACL file. The content of the ACL file is as following: * owner r INBOX owner lrwstipekxa INBOX/* owner lrwstipekxa user owner rwstipekxa user/* owner rwstipekxa This worked fine but after update any user cannot see any folders from under the INBOX, also they cannot create any new folders. Error into the logs are

Hi all. This might seem really naive, but can mtree be used effectively as a native-to-core-OS tripwire equivalent? Would it be as efficient in terms of time-to-run and resource requirements? What sort of pitfalls should I be aware of? Has anyone here done this? If so, would you care to share your scripts/techniques? Thanks, Dave -- ______________________

Hi! (I sent other mails some time ago, about not-using the Julian''s patches). When I try the configuration from Nano.txt, having the Julian''s patches applied, only the first ''hop'' of the routing table "222" is used (according to tables shown in Nano.txt). I saw that this question was asked some time ago, with no answer. Maybe someone can tell me the

Hello list. I would like to get your opinion on what is a safe multi-user environment. The scenario: We would like to offer to some customers of ours some sort of network backup/archive. They would put daily or weekly backups from their local machine on our server using rsync and SSH. Therefore, they all have a user account on our server. However, we must ensure that they would absolutely not be

Hi! I am pleased to announce the availability of libgcrypt version 1.1.11. Libgcrypt is a general purpose cryptographic library based on the code from GnuPG and licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License. It provides functions for all cryptograhic building blocks: symmetric ciphers (AES,DES,Blowfish,CAST5,Twofish,Arcfour), hash algorithms (MD4, MD5, RIPE-MD160, SHA-1, TIGER-192), MACs

Áô©~ªº ¦Ñ¤H wrote: > Dear Segher > > Thanks for your information. Besides, the mechanism of the huffman > decoding seems can not work in a 24-bit processor if the code length > exceeds 24, though I have checked several vorbis file from network and > they are all below 24 bit True; but you can special case the >24 bit codebook to use a more "traditional" decoding