similar to: Withdrawal of package Rigroup-0.84.0 from CRAN

Hi, Who should I ask about my package Rigroup_0.83 being moved to Archive status on CRAN and no longer available via install.package? I have no problems with the move if this was simply because of low demand. However, if there was a build issue with the newest releases that caused problems, I would be happy to address it. I'll just ask my students to install it from my own locally hosted

MiKTeX has abruptly removed texi2dvi.exe from its distribution. (MiKTeX broke its updating process earlier and an attempted update trashed the updater on my installation so I was forced to make a fresh install of the current distribution. I do not know if updates remove a currently installed texi2dvi.exe.) This has two consequences: 1) It is used by tools::texi2dvi() if found. As far as I

How can I change the position of the ylab, after enlarging the margins with par(mar=...)? Here is the relevant code snippet ---- par(mar=c(5.1,5.1,4.1,2.1)) plot(c(1979,2003),c(40,50),ylim=c(1,73),lab=c(20,10,1),pch=21,col='blue',bg='blue',axes=FALSE,xlab="Years",ylab="Onset/Withdrawl Date",font.lab=2) box() axis(1,las=2)

I believe the performance of isUnsorted() in sort.c could be improved by calling REAL() once (outside of the for loop), rather than calling it twice inside the loop. As an aside, it is implemented in the faster way in doSort() (sort.c line 401). The example below shows the performance improvement for a vectors of double of moving REAL() outside the for loop. # example as implemented in

Dear Listmembers, I'm trying to fill up a dataframe depending on an arbitrary list of references: Here is my code, which works: dat <- data.frame(c(60001,60001,60050,60050,60050),c(27,129,618,27,1579)) LR <- sort(unique(dat[,1])) LC <- sort(unique(dat[,2])) m <- as.data.frame(matrix(data=NA, nrow=length(LR), ncol=length(LC), dimnames=list(LR,LC))) for(i in 1:nrow(dat)){

Hi, In the man page for is.unsorted(): Value: A length-one logical value. All objects of length 0 or 1 are sorted: the result will be ?NA? for objects of length 2 or more except for atomic vectors and objects with a class (where the ?>=? or ?>? method is used to compare ?x[i]? with ?x[i-1]? for ?i? in ?2:length(x)?). This contains many incorrect

Hi, I've read ?is.unsorted and searched. Have found a few items but nothing close, yet. Is the following expected? > is.unsorted(data.frame(1:2)) [1] FALSE > is.unsorted(data.frame(2:1)) [1] FALSE > is.unsorted(data.frame(1:2,3:4)) [1] TRUE > is.unsorted(data.frame(2:1,4:3)) [1] TRUE IIUC, is.unsorted is intended for atomic vectors only (description of x in ?is.unsorted). Indeed

(Subject: renamed as thread hijacked from the ParallelR thread --Dirk) On 23 April 2009 at 14:44, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: | Aside from R there are the add-on packages. | | A frequency table showing the licenses of the CRAN packages indicates | that the all or almost all packages have some sort of free software license | with GPL licenses being most common. (A few packages have restrictions |

Hi, Couldn't is.unsorted() bail out immediately here (after comparing the first 2 elements): > x <- 20000000:1 > system.time(is.unsorted(x), gcFirst=TRUE) user system elapsed 0.084 0.040 0.124 > x <- 200000000:1 > system.time(is.unsorted(x), gcFirst=TRUE) user system elapsed 0.772 0.440 1.214 Thanks! H.

Hi, Some 'bibentry' methods have the side effect of changing the default bibstyle. Background: tools::bibstyle() defines and registers bibtex styles for formatting 'bibentry' objects. It optionally (and by default) sets a default style. It is also used to get a particular style. The last feature of bibstyle() is used in 'bibentry' methods defined in packages

I've just realized that it could be handy to have a 'decreasing' argument in 'is.unsorted'. And I'm cheekily hoping someone else will implement it. It is easy enough to work around (with 'rev'), but would be less hassle with an argument. The case I have in mind uses 'is.unsorted' in 'stopifnot'. Pat -- Patrick Burns pburns at pburns.seanet.com

For some reason this didn't make the list and I got no approval message... this time I'll force the From to be my subscribed address. Bug in Monty's new filtering system? Anyway, here goes again. ----- Forwarded message from ----- Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 10:24:46 -0400 To: vorbis-dev@xiph.org Subject: Re: [vorbis-dev] [fwd] CVS: ogg123 rocks! vcut no so much so... (from:

Hi all, This must be such a beginner''s problem, but I can''t figure it out. I''m pulling two integers out of a database, and i want to divide one value with the other, but i keep getting an error about operating on strings. Here''s the code - low_freq = unsorted.last.freq high_freq = unsorted.first.freq divider = high_freq / low_freq In my view, if i display

Dear friends, My dataset is like the following: x y mcpvalue 0.4603578 0.6247629 1.001 0.4603715 0.6247788 1.001 0.4603852 0.6247948 1.001 0.4110561 0.5664841 0.995 The x and y variables are unsorted. I use the function image(x,y,mcpvalue) to generate a plot, but the error is that "increasing 'x' and

This is intended to be a bug report with proposed patch. I am posting to this mailing list as described in NOTE in "Bug Reporting in R". Function `stats:::regularize.values()` is meant to preprocess `x` and `y` arguments to have "proper" values for later use during interpolation. If input is already "proper", I would expect it to reuse the same objects without

This is intended to be a bug report with proposed patch. I am posting to this mailing list as described in NOTE in "Bug Reporting in R". Function `stats:::regularize.values()` is meant to preprocess `x` and `y` arguments to have "proper" values for later use during interpolation. If input is already "proper", I would expect it to reuse the same objects without

On 10/9/2017 1:28 PM, mj via samba wrote: > Hi all, > > We would appreciate some input here. Not sure where to look... > > We have three AD DCs, all running samba 4.5.10, and since a few days, > the samba DCs are getting stuck regularly, at ramdon times. Happens to > all three of them, randomly, and currently it is happening up to a few > times per day..! Must be some

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7861 Summary: documentation: files-frombehaves badly on unsorted input Product: rsync Version: 3.0.5 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: rlpowell at

Hi ..., I am trying to upgrade from Samba 4.4.4 to Samba 4.7.7 and I am facing an error similar to the one mentioned here - https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12297 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12385 I get the following error message *every time* I run - samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix --yes

I am wondering why sieve-filter is so slow compared to gnu sieve. I run mpop (like getmail) to download from a pop3 server to a local mbox file: ~/mail/email-incoming-unsorted This step is very fast. The next step, I throw the email-incoming-unsorted mbox file at a sieve processor, to sort the emails from that mbox, into other mboxes, according to the sieve rules file. Up until a couple days