similar to: [Bug 1039] Incomplete application of HostKeyAlias in ssh

> > Message: 8 > Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 12:46:50 -0700 > From: Iain Morgan <imorgan at nas.nasa.gov> > To: Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> > Cc: "openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org" <openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org> > Subject: Re: Call for testing: OpenSSH-6.3 > Message-ID: <20130730194649.GC18047 at linux124.nas.nasa.gov> >

No, I just think 15 years or so is more than enough time to have addressed the issue. On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 14:05:08 -0700, Dan Kaminsky wrote: > So, this isn't your problem and you don't respect the people's whose > problem it is. > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Iain Morgan <imorgan at nas.nasa.gov> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:55:18

Hi, OpenSSH 2.9p2 behaves differently with 'PermitRootLogin without-password' than does SSH 2.2.27 with 'PermitRootLogin nopwd': nopython.imorgan 153> ssh root at sun523 root at sun523's password: ROOT LOGIN REFUSED FROM nopython.nas.nasa.gov nopython.imorgan 154> ssh root at sun566 root at sun566's password: Permission denied. In the case of OpenSSH, you simply

Thanks, Iain. I am willing to hear from other users whether anyone else sees this as a bug before filing it. -- Vincenzo Romano Il giorno ven 2 nov 2018, 20:03 Iain Morgan <imorgan at nas.nasa.gov> ha scritto: > If you truly intend this as a bug report, you should file it at > bugzilla.mindrot.org. > > On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 12:25:22 +0100, Vincenzo Romano wrote: > >

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1039 Summary: Incomplete application of HostKeyAlias in ssh Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.0p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: cdmclain

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1169 Iain Morgan <imorgan at nas.nasa.gov> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |imorgan at nas.nasa.gov --- Comment #10 from Iain Morgan <imorgan at nas.nasa.gov> --- Perhaps this could

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1424 Iain Morgan <imorgan at nas.nasa.gov> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |imorgan at nas.nasa.gov --- Comment #36 from Iain Morgan <imorgan at nas.nasa.gov> --- Created attachment

On 29 September 2017 at 11:05, Iain Morgan <imorgan+openssh at nas.nasa.gov> wrote: [...] > This is due to my shell being csh, which is pickier about undefined > variables than the Bourne-style shells. The attached patch fixes the > issue. Thanks for figuring this out. > - 'test -z "$SSH_USER_AUTH"' || fail "SSH_USER_AUTH present" > +

Hi, I'm not a subscriber to this list so please CC: me in any replies. I found myself in a situation where I was behind a corporate firewall that allowed only web requests to the outside world (and furthermore those requests had to be via their proxy server). Therefore, I couldn't SSH to the outside world. However, the HTTP proxy 'CONNECT' method, which is normally used to

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2728 Bug ID: 2728 Summary: HostKeyAlias not respected for certificate authority host key validation Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.5p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ssh

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2150 Bug ID: 2150 Summary: Recursive upload expects target directory to already exist Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: sftp

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2211 Bug ID: 2211 Summary: Too many hostbased authentication attempts Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.5p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2062 Bug ID: 2062 Summary: Add support for a ForceShell sshd option Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: sshd

My apologies to the list for inadvertently taking this offline. As info: -----Original Message----- From: Iain Morgan [mailto:Iain.Morgan at nasa.gov] Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 8:15 PM To: wfdawson at bellsouth.net Subject: Re: Help with CA Certificates for user authentication? On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 11:53:25 -0500, wfdawson at bellsouth.net wrote: > > Thanks for the

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1462 Summary: Unaligned access warnings on IA64 when using umac-64 Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.0p1 Platform: Itanium2 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1798 Summary: Add fsync() support to sftp/sftp-server Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sftp-server AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1039 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #12 from Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> 2010-03-26 10:51:05 EST --- With the

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1039 ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2005-06-17 13:54 ------- I don't understand: you know the alias hostname, because it is there on the commandline, so the prompt is providing you more, real information. Can you give me a real-life scenario where showing the alias hostname would be important? ------- You are receiving

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1039 ------- Comment #8 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2005-11-24 19:47 ------- (In reply to comment #7) > I don't understand: you know the alias hostname, because it is there on the > commandline, so the prompt is providing you more, real information. > > Can you give me a real-life scenario where showing the alias hostname would be

Il giorno dom 4 nov 2018 alle ore 01:45 Ben Lindstrom <mouring at offwriting.org> ha scritto: > > I don't see it as a bug. Yes, this is why I put a question mark in the subject. > As if I'm writing a batch script I want to see the echo of the command and the output so if there is a failure I know where the failure is. I see: you have a single batch file with no