similar to: Samba4: force user issue

On Sun, 10 May 2015, Rowland Penny wrote: > Have you really got 19 reverse zones for your samba 4 active directory ? Yep :-) > Can you try running 'samba-tool ldapcmp ldap://<YOUR_FIRST_DC> ldap://<YOUR_SECOND_DC> Interesting. DC1 and DC2 have many differences; DC1 and DC3 are the same. Maybe I will demote DC2 and join it again. > Check if you actually have dns

Roland, Thank you very much for your attention to this. You should get a medal for all the help you give everyone on this list. On Sun, 10 May 2015, Rowland Penny wrote: > Why ? And why don't they show up when you ask for the zones with samba-tool ? I have that many subnets. As for why they don't show up: they are defined in BIND's configuration and not samba's; they never

On Sun, 10 May 2015, Rowland Penny wrote: > can you post your named conf files. Sure. This is samba's: dlz "AD DNS Zone" { database "dlopen /mnt/domain/samba/europa/lib/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so"; }; and this is BIND's (notice the last line commented out): options { directory "/var/named"; dump-file "/var/named/data/cache_dump.db";

Samba 4.1.1 using BIND_DLZ (bind-9.9.1-0.1.P2) on CentOS 6.5 x86_64. I have two domain controllers, dc-1 and dc-2, which each have three network interfaces. Selinux is in permissive mode, and iptables is off. One interface on each dc is to be shut down. So, on dc-1, I do: # nsupdate -g update delete europa.icse.cornell.edu A 192.168.3.250 update delete europa.icse.cornell.edu A 192.168.3.251

On 10/05/15 15:34, Steve Thompson wrote: > On Sun, 10 May 2015, Rowland Penny wrote: > >> Have you really got 19 reverse zones for your samba 4 active directory ? > > Yep :-) Why ? And why don't they show up when you ask for the zones with samba-tool ? > >> Can you try running 'samba-tool ldapcmp ldap://<YOUR_FIRST_DC> >>

Samba 4.0.0, CentOS 6.4, bind 9.9 DLZ. I could use some help debugging a strange DNS issue. I have two Samba4 domain controllers, dc-1.europa.icse.cornell.edu and dc-2.europa.icse.cornell.edu. On either dc-1 or dc-2 or any client host: # host dc-1.europa.icse.cornell.edu dc-2 dc-1.europa.icse.cornell.edu has address 192.168.15.250 dc-1.europa.icse.cornell.edu has address 192.168.3.250

On 10/05/15 16:08, Steve Thompson wrote: > Roland, > > Thank you very much for your attention to this. You should get a medal > for all the help you give everyone on this list. > > On Sun, 10 May 2015, Rowland Penny wrote: > >> Why ? And why don't they show up when you ask for the zones with >> samba-tool ? > > I have that many subnets. As for why they

On Sun, 10 May 2015, Rowland Penny wrote: > It might not be as bad as what you think, do you have the two DNs ? > > ldbedit -e nano -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -b > "CN=Infrastructure,DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=europa,DC=icse,DC=cornell,DC=edu" Yes, I have both of the dn's. However, neither of them have an fSMORoleOwner attribute. That I will fix and report back.

Hi, Can you add the following two publications from our group to the LLVM publications page. - *Alive-FP: Automated Verification of Floating Point Based Peephole Optimizations in LLVM [pdf] <http://www.cs.rutgers.edu/~santosh.nagarakatte/papers/alive-fp-sas16.pdf> *David Menendez, Santosh Nagarakatte, and Aarti Gupta *To Appear in the Proceedings of the 23rd Static Analysis

On Mar 30, 2010, at 11:33 AM, John Regehr wrote: > John-- a couple questions: > > Can you explain the SAFECode model in a bit more detail? I am getting > conflicting information. On one hand, some of the papers describe a > system that is primarily designed to hide safety violations. On the other > hand, the 2006 ICSE paper that I cited earlier today seems to be talking

This link: http://us3.samba.org/samba/docs/man/smb.conf.5.html#LOGONPATH States that: "Windows clients can sometimes maintain a connection to the [homes] share, even though there is no user logged in. Therefore, it is vital that the logon path does not include a reference to the homes share (i.e. setting this parameter to \%N\%U\profile_path will cause problems)." I am still

John-- a couple questions: Can you explain the SAFECode model in a bit more detail? I am getting conflicting information. On one hand, some of the papers describe a system that is primarily designed to hide safety violations. On the other hand, the 2006 ICSE paper that I cited earlier today seems to be talking about catching violations. These are very different goals! What does the code

ALL: Please forgive my ignorance. I am not just naive regarding Samba..., or Solaris..., or UNIX, or Windows Networking..., the naivity courses through my veins abundantly in all IT related matters. :-) Our work unit is the lone UNIX [Samba server 2.2 on Solaris 8] installation on the organizational Windows WAN. None of the analysts in our unit have domain admin rights. The sys manager in

On 10/05/15 12:49, Steve Thompson wrote: > On Sun, 10 May 2015, Rowland Penny wrote: > >> can you post your named conf files. > > Sure. This is samba's: > > dlz "AD DNS Zone" { > database "dlopen /mnt/domain/samba/europa/lib/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so"; > }; > > and this is BIND's (notice the last line commented out): > > options

On Sun, 10 May 2015, Rowland Penny wrote: > You definitely seem to have problems there. Indeed I do :-( > You do know that there are 7 (yes seven) fsmoroles ? Oh crap. I checked on the original DC before I demoted it, and there were only 5 displayed, so I thought that was all I should have. At least, I transferred -all roles, and only those 5 made it. This is going to be a pain to

I set up printing IAW: http://us4.samba.org/samba/docs/man/printing.html I've confirmed the drivers are being installed to /etc/samba/drivers/W32X86. Yet I am unable to print even a test page. I get the following error: "Test page failed to print. Would you like to view the print trouble shooter for assistance? Access is denied." And I get the following errors in my samba

CentOS 6.4 x86_64, Samba 3.6.9 on member servers, joined to a Samba 4.0.3 AD domain. I am attempting to use the Samba3 member server ("TS-1") as a print server. While CUPS works well, I cannot upload any drivers ("access denied"), and I cannot see any drivers in the [print$] share, even though I have populated these from a functioning Samba3 domain. I can map the

On 10/05/15 17:25, Steve Thompson wrote: > On Sun, 10 May 2015, Rowland Penny wrote: > >> You definitely seem to have problems there. > > Indeed I do :-( > >> You do know that there are 7 (yes seven) fsmoroles ? > > Oh crap. I checked on the original DC before I demoted it, and there > were only 5 displayed, so I thought that was all I should have. At >

Samba 4.1.16, Centos 6.6 x86-64, BIND_DLZ 9.9. I have three AD DC's that were functioning normally. However, today I restarted BIND on one node, and it failed to start with this message in the log (names changed): May 10 07:02:49 benford named[6767]: Loading 'AD DNS Zone' using driver dlopen May 10 07:02:49 benford named[6767]: samba_dlz: started for DN DC=samdom,DC=example,DC=com May

In need of some help here. I hope I haven't trimmed this too much. As I mentioned before, I have a CentOS 6.3 system using SSSD (only) bound to the samba4 DC as an LDAP server using the following in sssd.conf: [domain/SAMBA] ldap_default_bind_dn = CN=Administrator,CN=Users,DC=... ldap_default_authtok = <supersecret> ldap_default_authtok_type = password ... and everything