similar to: Samba4 member of an another « Samba4 » domain

On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 18:53:22 +0100 Volker Lendecke via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 05:55:58PM +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger via > samba wrote: > > Am 2016-12-30 um 17:42 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > > > >OK, try this, open a terminal, type 'winbindd -i' > > >This should directly run winbind in the

On 2017-11-13 12:33, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:05:33 +0100 > Sven Schwedas <sven.schwedas at tao.at> wrote: > >> /etc/hostname:villach-file >> /etc/hosts:# The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts >> /etc/hosts:::1 localhost ip6-localhost ip6-loopback >> /etc/hosts:ff02::1 ip6-allnodes >>

On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 14:26:01 +0100 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 2016-12-30 um 14:07 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > Is this the smb.conf you got when you ran the classicupgrade ? > > I don't think it is, can I suggest you remove any and all lines you > > have added and restart samba > > that was the

Hi, I used Samba 4.0.5 in Wheezy. Here is that I have done: --------------------------------------------------------------- samba-tool domain provision --realm=CHEZMOI.PRIV --domain=CHEZMOI \ --server-role=dc --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL --adminpass='+toto123' echo "nameserver 192.168.0.21" > /etc/resolv.conf samba ln -s /usr/local/samba/lib/libnss_winbind.so

In doing my testing I''m wondering if maintaining backwards compatability for existing applications is important. The question boils down to this: Are there sufficient applications that are using wxRuby (pre swig) that we should expect to have to support all/most without changes or should we expect that most applications will need to learn the ''new'' ways things

Helo List, Sorry I missed the rest of my email in my previous post. Please see below. I'm having an issue using the AND (&) operator evaluation in the code of my dialplan. The dial plan is coded to detect inbound DTMF digits from callers. key "1" is equivalent to "yes" and key "2" is equivalent to "no" in two diferent contexts in the dial plan.

Hello All, I'm new to the list and I don't have much of experience with samba. I have a test setup on CentOS 7.8 with samba-4.10.4 and samba-vfs-glusterfs . When my client mounts the samba share via vers=1.0 , the user sees the share properly (uid,gid,mode are just like on gluster). When the share is mounted with vers=2.0 or not specified (anything higher) the files are owned by

http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/test/ I should have released 0.99.10 already I think.. There's just two annoying problems that I think should be fixed first: - PAM: If user gives a wrong password, dovecot-auth process sleeps for two seconds, blocking everyone else who are trying to authenticate at the time. So using PAM isn't very good idea at the moment. - OpenSSL problems. Are they

http://dovecot.org/test/ - "Maildir sync: UID < next_uid (446 < 447, file = .." errors should be fixed - fixes for detecting changes in uidvalidity and external uidnext changes - several fixes and cleanups in index file handling. less code than before and now changes to index header also go through transaction log. that should mean that soon I can get mmap_disable = yes

Although the specific behaviour that was reported has been fixed, bugs remain in Sweave's processing of comment lines when keep.source=TRUE This is in some senses a follow-up from earlier bugs. Hence the query -- what is the preferred procedure, to submit a new bug report? (Another option might be to add a comment to the web page for bug 14459.) Is there now a preference to submit via

Hello all llvm-link merges together the metadata from the IR files being linked together. This means that when linking different libraries together (i.e. multiple source files that have been compiled into a single LLVM IR file) it can be hard or impossible to identify the library boundaries. We're using LLVM to do static analysis of applications (together with their dependent libraries) and

On 03/04/15 13:05, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Ashish Yadav! > >>>> I'm trying to get the former PDC back into domain after performing a >>> classic >>>> migration. >>>> AD DC is running fine... if you can call it that. >>>> I've edited the smb.conf and nsswitch.conf as suggested in Wiki article, >>> and

http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/test/ - Hopefully OpenSSL is fixed :) - We sometimes produced invalid ENVELOPE with 8bit headers. That could really have broken things (broke it in test12). So, what's left is to make PAM work well..

On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 20:57:44 +0530 (GMT+05:30) anand@eis.iisc.ernet.in (SVR Anand) wrote: > Hi, > > I am one of the system administrators who manage a campus network of 5000 users > that is connected to Internet. We have placed a Linux bridge to isolate the > Internet from the campus. To nullify network flooding effect, we have used > iptables. The kernel is 2.6.0-test9, the

Hi Felix, thanks for the share. Sadly it doesn't work and I don't know how to start debugging this one. I tried your config (had to switch from domain member to standalone) but it's the same: [global] ??????? netbios name = yourName ??????? workgroup = yourWorkgroup ??????? realm = YourRealm ??????? log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m ??????? max log size = 50 ??????? security = ads

When i send more than one messages shortly after the other, my log (/var/spool/asterisk/sms ) looks like this and only two of four messages arrive. What am i doing wrong ? I am using an AVM B1 PCI with chan-capi and 1.4.4. and also, when sending with smsq -x only two of the messages are handled. (i thought, asterisk itself handles the queues ? ) Here the log: 2007-07-09T15:04:14 YOM04 0 -

X forwarding doesn't work for me under Linux kernels 2.4.0-test8 or test9, using OpenSSH 2.2.0p1 (as packaged in Debian woody.) When I try to ssh to my machine, the client spits out the following pieces of information: Warning: Remote host denied X11 forwarding. Last login: Tue Oct 3 15:26:19 2000 from localhost on pts/2 Linux mallard 2.4.0-test9 #3 Tue Oct 3 14:20:59 CDT 2000 i686 unknown

After a scheduled power outage, with all hosts cleanly shut down, I'm having a bad performance issue on my samba server. This configuration has worked well for over a year, but after the power outage, attempting to access any share takes over a minute. net ads testjoin is fine, wbinfo -u and wbinfo -g returns the correct information. The shares CAN be accessed, once accessed, read and write

Hi! I've attached a patch which takes care of the issues mentioned (and adds two tests). -- Sanjoy Das http://playingwithpointers.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ripple-bucket.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 3318 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110308/0814e3e8/attachment.diff>

On 03/04/15 19:33, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Rowland Penny! > >>>>>> I'm trying to get the former PDC back into domain after performing a >>>>> classic >>>>>> migration. >>>>>> AD DC is running fine... if you can call it that. >>>>>> I've edited the smb.conf and nsswitch.conf as suggested in