similar to: rsync 3.0.9 partial file left after CTRL-C WITHOUT using --partial

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "rsync 3.0.9 partial file left after CTRL-C WITHOUT using --partial"

2013 Apr 05
3
Fwd: rsync 3.0.9 partial file left after CTRL-C WITHOUT using --partial
Hi folks, man page says "By default, rsync will delete any partially transferred file if the transfer is interrupted" I have (reproducible) a partial file left, if I do CTRL-C source-dir: mounted LVM XFS dest-dir: see source-dir Ubuntu 12.04.1 (LTS) kernel 3.2.0-39-generic command: rsync -a
2013 Dec 02
0
hardlinking and -R (multiple source directories)
Hi, now it's time to come back to this topic. As supposed, the missing hardlinks where no issue of rsync. I am not sure if pairing aufs (http://aufs.sourceforge.net/) and rsync -RH will catch each and every hardlink compared to a single filesystem, but it seems to work very reliable. I tried mhdfs and aufs. Aufs is faster and very stable (I am on wheezy kernel 3.2). So at last I have my
2010 Nov 05
1
[LLVMdev] llvm autoconf using LLVM_SRC_ROOT?
Hi I am trying to create a new LLVM project that uses autoconf to configure it. the example requires me to define * LLVM_SRC_ROOT - The root of the LLVM source tree. * LLVM_OBJ_ROOT - The root of the LLVM object tree Is this required? Why? I just want to use the libraries that were installed using Ubuntu 10.04. I can compile programs using llvmc $ llvmc --version Low Level
2010 Nov 05
2
[LLVMdev] llvm autoconf using LLVM_SRC_ROOT?
Hi I am trying to create a new LLVM project that uses autoconf to configure it. the example requires me to define * LLVM_SRC_ROOT - The root of the LLVM source tree. * LLVM_OBJ_ROOT - The root of the LLVM object tree Is this required? Why? I just want to use the libraries that were installed using Ubuntu 10.04. I can compile programs using llvmc $ llvmc --version Low Level
2013 Aug 02
2
hardlinking and -R (multiple source directories)
Hi, hardlinking (-H) works perfectly while using a syntax like -avhxSDH <SRC> <DEST> Now I have to mirror multiple SRC directories which contain hardlinks. e. g: src1/a is a hardlink to src2/b -RavhxSDH SRC1 SRC2 DEST does not preserve hardlink a and b in DEST. Is there any chance to do that? Thanks lopiuh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
2024 Jun 03
1
Diff between using "-i" and not using "-i"
Hi, Version: sync version 3.3.0 protocol version 31 If I do a <rsync -avhHXASDn --del /mnt/ /foo/mnt/> I get: ================= sending incremental file list var/log/journal/ sent 263,31K bytes received 1,14K bytes 528,90K bytes/sec total size is 294,92M speedup is 1.115,21 (DRY RUN) ================= including option <-i>: rsync -avhHXASDin --del /mnt/ /foo/mnt/ I get:
2013 Dec 02
2
symlink in -R src_dirlist and real dirs on target
Hi folks, I have a bunch of directories to mirror via rsync. I have lots of hardlinked files spread about these directories. Therfore I use -R (--relative) and -H. so far ok but: I create symlinks to the source-directories via script because src-dirs have changing names (date and time of backup) and I want to have constant directory names on target. How can I achieve that? I thought -k
2009 Aug 31
0
[LLVMdev] accessing a bitcode library exported from C++ using the JIT
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Samuel Crow<samuraileumas at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hello, > > My partner and I am making a small app needs to access a C++ library from the LLVM 2.5 JIT.  We've made sure that there are no classes and have put 'extern "c"' in front of the functions we need to access.  In order to make this work, we seem to need to have a bitcode
2024 Jun 03
1
Diff between using "-i" and not using "-i"
It appears that xattr changes (that is what the x mens) never made it into the verbose output. I would call that a bug but I would rather it be fixed by making -v include -i. On 6/3/24 05:22, - via rsync wrote: > Hi, > > Version: sync version 3.3.0 protocol version 31 > > If I do a <rsync -avhHXASDn --del /mnt/ /foo/mnt/> > > I get: > ================= >
2009 Aug 31
2
[LLVMdev] accessing a bitcode library exported from C++ using the JIT
Hello, My partner and I am making a small app needs to access a C++ library from the LLVM 2.5 JIT. We've made sure that there are no classes and have put 'extern "c"' in front of the functions we need to access. In order to make this work, we seem to need to have a bitcode version of libstdc++ so we can avoid writing our own implementations of std::string and std::vector.
2009 Sep 01
4
[LLVMdev] accessing a bitcode library exported from C++ using the JIT
----- Original Message ---- > From: Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> > To: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> > Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 3:49:01 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] accessing a bitcode library exported from C++ using the JIT > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Samuel
2011 Jan 23
0
Error for compiling Rquantlib package 0.3.5 under Window 7 64bits
Hi, I am trying to build a binary of Rquantlib package 0.3.5 under Window 7 64bits. I am using mingw gcc version 4.5.1 (tdm64-1) which is a experimental version of 64 bits ming gcc. (http://tdm-gcc.tdragon.net/). I have successfully compiled boost 1.45 and Quantlib 1.0.1 with this gcc. And then when I tried to compile Rquantlib 0.3.5, it reports some error. The first error is like below.
2011 Jan 14
1
[LLVMdev] Building Boost library failed with Clang 2.9
I tried building boost 1.45 release with clang 2.9 following instructions on http://blog.llvm.org/2010/05/clang-builds-boost.html but got the following result: $ clang++ --version clang version 2.9 (trunk 123420) Target: x86_64-apple-darwin10 Thread model: posix $ ./bjam toolset=clang Building the Boost C++ Libraries. Performing configuration checks - has_icu builds : no
2014 Mar 18
0
Writing R Extensions: clarification/modification request
Hello R-core developers, The upcoming release of R-3.1.0 is exciting, especially the support structure changes for c++11! But, just the other day I encountered an issue with the package creation tools within Rcpp and Dirk referred me to 'Writing R Extensions' [footnote 13] along with the comment that `.hpp` file extensions are "verboten" on CRAN and then proceeded to find
2011 Mar 11
2
Running Hitec HPP-22 under wine. (RC device, USB)
I use the Hitec Aurora 9 (A9) transmitter for my remote control vehicles. http://www.hitecrcd.com/products/aircraft-radios-receivers-and-accesories/aircraft/aurora9/aurora-9-2-4ghz.html This transmitter is part of a system of devices. One of the devices in this system is the HPP-22, which is a USB device that allows a computer to communicate with the A9 in order to load and save model
2009 May 12
1
[LLVMdev] MSVC cstdint
In the llvm file include/llvm/Support/DataTypes.h (.in/.cmake), for MSVCit defines some macros that are defined in the cstdint.hpp file in boost (and boost does it better, detailed below): The basic error is: R:\SDKs\boost\built_head\include\boost-1_38\boost/cstdint.hpp(347) : warning C4005: 'INT8_C' : macro redefinition
2011 Feb 15
0
[LLVMdev] Need Advice: X86ShuffleDecode Problem
I've run into a problem with X86ShuffleDecode.hpp while implementing AVX shuffles. It turns out that to decode AVX shuffles properly, I need to pass types to the X86ShuffleDecode logic. NumElements is not enough because 4 elements could mean 4 32-bit or 4 64-bit. The shuffle decode will be different based on the element type. As things stand right now, X86ShuffleDecode.hpp gets included
2008 Aug 14
0
RGBL not compiling with R-devel under Debian Lenny
Some time ago I had difficulty installing RBGL with Ubuntu Hardy on R-2.7.0 and the problem was attributed to an with BGL. I got some very helpful advice and posted a script to fix the problem by hacking the RGBL source code: dateTue, Jan 15, 2008 at 2:16 PMsubjectRe: [R-sig-Debian] trouble installing building packages from source using R 2.6.0 on Ubuntu Gutsy AMD64mailing
2006 Jul 20
2
failed installing rgl
Dear all, I have tried installing "rgl" with the usual command: R CMD INSTALL rgl_0.67-2.tar.gz Differently from what happened last time I have succesfully installed this package, this time there was a failure: ... ...g++ -I/usr/lib/R/include -I/usr/lib/R/include -I -DHAVE_PNG_H -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/local/include -fpic -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
2002 Mar 12
0
MatClass
Hello, I have written a small set of R functions for doing Generative Topographic Mapping and variants, and would like to write part of the code in C++ using the MatClass Matrix Library ( http://les.man.ac.uk/ses/staff/crb/matclass/ ). Now, my problem is even before writing the code itself, to compile the MatClass library. Everything is OK under Windows but when trying to port the program to