similar to: Pros and cons of having folders under INBOX vs. not

I've got Dovecot 2.2r5 (Ubuntu package version 2:2.2.0~rc5-0~auto+1 from the "testing-auto/dovecot-2.2" repository on xi.rename-it.nl) running on a brand-new Ubuntu 12.04.2 server. I'm trying to configure Dovecot (using the "mdbox" mailbox format) to allow folders to contain both messages and sub-folders. However, it's not working consistently. I need to have

Thank you for the reply. I did find imapsync whilst perusing Google. I will give it a shot, it sounds more realistic/reliable. I have a hoard of emails going back to 1999, so I want as few errors as possible :) On 11/7/15 3:31 PM, Philon wrote: > Hi there, > > I was in the same position, but for mutliple accounts. Still you might want to look at imapsync

Hello, Because it did not work ? In a similar situation, we where forced to use isync/mbsync in imap to imap mode because dsync did not work. It was reported here more than a year ago (May 2014). Time to time, I see the same report from other trying to use dsync to do a migration to dovecot. Dsync is a very appealing and elegant solution to this usage, but it does not always work in real

Hi, No, I tried fetching over imapc too exactly as you suggested. In my case it was not from cyrus, but from CriticalPath. isync was finally able to do the job, preserving flags and doing UIDs mapping. The most boring part was generating proper config file for thousands of accounts. A working imapc/dsync would have been better. Emmanuel. Le 26/11/2015 15:24, Sami Ketola a ?crit : > Hi,

On 23/01/16 15:33, Robert Schetterer wrote: > for multiple advanced imap settings at migration you might use > imapsync not dsync Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer Sure but imapsync does not preserve message UID's which means that users end up redownloading all their messages or message/UID mismatches will happen. Sami

> On 26 Jan 2016, at 15:56, Marc Schiffbauer <m at sys4.de> wrote: > > * Sami Ketola schrieb am 23.01.16 um 23:27 Uhr: >> >> >> On 23/01/16 15:33, Robert Schetterer wrote: >>> for multiple advanced imap settings at migration you might use >>> imapsync not dsync Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer >> Sure but imapsync does not preserve

Am 04.09.2018 um 18:27 schrieb Sami Ketola: > > >> On 4 Sep 2018, at 18.38, Robert Schetterer <rs at sys4.de> wrote: >> >> Sorry i migrated terrabytes of mail with imapsync and never had a >> problem, it works as designed, also with maildir rsync did a good job, >> what never worked as it should was dsync ,cause of bugs ,that may >> changed now

Hi All! I am working on a complete migration from an old solaris machine running Cyrus IMAP v2.3.14 and wish to migrate all users to a new ubuntu vm running Dovecot 2.0.19. What I have so far is a fully functional dovecot installation with LDAP / Dovecot SASL auth using Maildir++. My plan is to use Perdition IMAP proxy on a third host and migrate users a few at a time (see attached picture of

R has very good GUI packages that I have used - R Commander RCmdr and Rattle rattle . Since I work on multiple packages with constraints of time, I almost always use the GUI rather go through the intricacies of command line . The log of these GUIs shows the relevant R command that was used, so you can actually learn the language also. I have written about the ease of learning R , if you begin

I wanted to share an article I recently wrote on my blog with all of you regarding using SQLite for your web-applications. The blog url is: http://rubyonrailsblog.com and the article is currently posted on the front-page. The exact url is located at: http://rubyonrailsblog.com/articles/2006/04/13/consider-sqlite-for-your-web-applications-the-pros-cons-and-when-to-use-it Your insights and feedback

I have a basic question, being new to EXT3. What are the pros and cons of using an external journal? Also, for a Terabyte-sized system, what should I use as the external journal's size? is there a general rule-of-thumb to follow when choosing the external journal's size? I know these are very basic questions, if they have been already answered in some FAQ, please let me know. Any

I wanted to share an article I recently wrote on my blog with all of you regarding using SQLite for your web-applications. The blog url is: http://rubyonrailsblog.com and the article is currently posted on the front-page. Your insights and feedback are appreciated and are always welcome. Also if you have a blog, please let me know and feel free to put a link to my blog up on your site. If you do,

Relative newbie so would welcome comments re structure of a self-referential relationship I''ve got. It''s started off similar to the Person HABTM friends in the Rails recipes books (working fine), but I needed to turn the join table into a full-blown model as I wanted to add attributes to it. Few tricky bits dealing with the new :through structure and understanding how :scope

I've read that certain operations performed on a matrix (e.g. ribind, cbind) are often much faster compared to operations performed on a data frame. Other then the "bind functions", what are the main operations that are significantly faster on a a matrix? I know that data frames allow for columnnames and rownames, and that each column in a data frame can have different data types.

Am 05.09.2018 um 07:37 schrieb Aki Tuomi: > >> On 04 September 2018 at 23:20 Robert Schetterer <rs at sys4.de> wrote: >> >> >> Am 04.09.2018 um 18:27 schrieb Sami Ketola: >>> >>> >>>> On 4 Sep 2018, at 18.38, Robert Schetterer <rs at sys4.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> Sorry i migrated terrabytes of mail with

Hi, I am Migrating an old cyrus mailserver to dovecot. in the old cyrus Mailserver all User Mailboxes are sub-mailboxes of their INBOX. I have to preserve that structure. During Migration with dsync I get these Errors: Error: Mailbox INBOX sync: mailbox_delete failed: INBOX can't be deleted Is there a way to work around these Errors ? Thanks Christoph

Hi, First of all thanks for all the answers .... all were very informative and helped me shape a better presentation. Although i received lots of emails saying that installation under Linux / Unix is easy .... still emails asking for help in installing R itself, or external packages and such crop more often than not on the list and for this reason i pressumed it is harder to install under Linux

I am the maintainer of its, but not it's original author. One of the main strengths of its is that it uses POSIXct dates. Zoo has the flexibility of using almost any date format, but I don't know if the other date formats can store hour, min, sec data. You might want to do a little exploring with each before you commit. I'll be happy to give you a hand if you decide to work with

I have Samba running without a PDC and I have some questions about the advantages for implementing one with Samba vs. the problems and disadvantages. Perhaps some kind souls can help me determine whether I should do this or not. We have three offices connected by a Checkpoint VPN, plus people "on the road" using their SecureClient tool. We want everyone to be able to get to all the