similar to: Moving mail servers, moving mailboxes

I was trying to get Samba4 [as a DC] setup on Ubuntu 18.04 However, I'm having quite a lot of difficulty. Has anyone successfully setup a samba4/adc on Ububtu 18.04 - and if so, have a quick walk-through. It would save me a lot of time, I expect. [Yeah, I know 18.04 has been out all of a week, but someone has to go first!] TIA -Greg

OK, I have a strange problem. It is probably something simple/stupid, but I cannot figure it out. I have a nice new PowerEdge T20 that I installed CentOS 6 (6.5) on with Virtualization (KVM). I then installed Ubuntu 14.04 in a virtual machine, with a bridged network: ------ begin ub140464.xml------------------ <domain type='kvm' id='2'>

I have downloaded Ububtu abd used Add/Remove to install Wine. I can not get it to work. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-users/attachments/20070906/86803328/attachment.htm

Hi I want to cross-compile llvm  for  arm board , running llvm on  Ububtu Server 11.04  x86_64  thank you -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111017/178ae8fe/attachment.html>

Hi, Im new at linux, I have Ububtu installed and I had wine 0.9.9 working properly. I uninstalled it and install wine 0.9.12 but when I tried to launch "uninstaller" it gives me the following message: wine client error:2d: version mismatch 229/232. Your wineserver binary was not upgraded correctly, or you have an older one somewhere in your PATH. Or maybe the wrong wineserver is still

I'm sure this is related to name-spaces, but for some reason [brain damage perhaps? :) ] I can't seem to figure out how to fix it. In TBird, for example, I have a folder tree that looks like this Inbox -| Folder-A Folder-B Folder-C Folder-A Folder-B Folder-C And Folder-A, Folder-B, Folder-C are the same folders, just shown twice. [In two different hierarchies.] I'm using

I'm still in the "what's wrong" stage of figuring out what's going on. But I've got a mail user who isn't getting new messages. Postfix accepts it and drops it in the users mbox. [This is verified. If I tail the Mbox, I can see the new messages.] "Mail" will see the messages too. But dovecot doesn't seem to know they exist. I don't think the MBox

So, I'm trying to paw through the long set of smb.conf options - and it's rather daunting. I'm wondering what smb.conf options are most important/appropriate/common for mostly Windows XP/7/(possibly v8) clients. TIA -Greg -- Gregory Sloop, Principal: Sloop Network & Computer Consulting 503.251.0452 x121 Voice | 503.251.0452 Fax www.sloop.net mailto:gregs at sloop.net

I have 2 Ububtu DCs. One acting as a secondary/failover. At one point the users were replicated from primary to secondary. But now they are not replicating. The output from samba-tool drs showrepl is attached. What else may I provide to aid diagnostics? I know Samba does not replicate sysvol 'yet', so rsync is needed, but that does not seem to contain the users. Thank you,

So that was really helpful for me to understand that a lot more clearly. Thanks! [Many, many thanks @Plutocrat!!] But I'm still getting a similar failure. Let me give the command I'm using. doveadm backup -D -u user at abc.net \ ssh root at po.abc.net \ docker exec b3093cxxxxxx doveadm sync -D -u user at abc.net The "local" server is where the data/mail currently is. The

So, I setup Samba on Ubuntu 18.04, using the packaged Samba version. [Thanks Rowland/Louis et al.] I'm doing some testing/tinkering using FreeNAS as a share, using the AD as the authentication back-end. As part of that process, you need to add a computer account and change some security settings. I setup RSAT and can see the AD tree, and add users etc. When I try to switch to advanced view

RPvs> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 10:06:52 -0800 RPvs> Gregory Sloop via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> RPvs> Have you read this: >> RPvs> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Roaming_Windows_User_Profiles >> RPvs> and possibly, this: >> RPvs> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configuring_Windows_Profile_Folder_Redirections >> RPvs>

So, I'm curious about the contrast between modifying netplan vs simply disabling systemd.resolved Is there some advantage to the gyrations to make netplan work, vs simply disabling resolved and manually defining the IP and DNS server? [I'm not complaining, I'm thankful for all the options - just wanting to have the best handle possible on the reasoning behind one method vs the other.]

Any harm in removing it now? On Tue, May 14, 2024, 10:04?AM Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 14 May 2024 09:48:47 -0700 > "Greg Sloop <gregs--- via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > Ah, that is your problem, if you are using winbind, you do not need > > > it. > > > > It's been

Rpvs> On 14/07/2020 17:25, Gregory Sloop via samba wrote: >> Rpvs> On 14/07/2020 16:51, Gregory Sloop via samba wrote: >>>> Yeah, I could setup an extra XCP box - but at smaller setups, it really seems like overkill. >>>> So, it sounds like restores of the VM work "fine." >>>> How often do machine accounts reset their passwords? >>

Dear list, I am trying to use MuMIn to compare all possible mixed models using the dredge function on binomial data but I am getting an error message that I cannot decode. This error only occurs when I use glmer. When I use an lmer analysis on a different response variable every works great. Example using a simplified glmer model global model: mod<- glmer(cbind(st$X2.REP.LIVE,

I know this has come up a bit in the past, but consider this situation: Two Samba4 DC's - and I want to "mirror" the data shares to the "backup" DC in case we lose the primary DC and it's file shares. [A cheap, dirty, poor-mans semi-CTDB. How did you ever guess that Red Green was helping me?!] The easiest way is probably rsync'ing the data. However, will that

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Gregory Sloop <gregs at sloop.net> wrote: > I love the idea of a low-power high-performance appliance. A NAS will > work fine for storage, but it's not going to act as a DC etc. [At least > none that I'm aware of and would trust.] > > Even appliances sorta like this, that I've seen, are easily five times the > price. > >

I have Samba 4 (lastest version, I think) set up for Active Driectory. Everything is working just, using Microsoft's Group Policy Editor to manage stuff. Except one thing: For reasons you don't want to get me started on, I need all users to have local administrative priviliges on any computer on the domain. This is supposed to be a simple, straightforward thing. Google has led me to

Louis, et al. Hi! So, I'm working on a 20.04 setup. I think I'll still use the distro version and not Louis' packages. [No offense Louis - I just need to be sure if (forbid) anything happens to Louis, his packages aren't going to be supported any more, and I'll be on my own for security updates etc. The 20.04 versions are pretty current, and I think will meet my needs for the