similar to: Rooted system

Hi all again, I must add, there are no log entries after June 9, 2004. "LKM" message first apeared June 8, 2004, after this day, there is nothing in /var/messages, /var/security ..... How could I look for suspicious LKM module ? How could I find it, if the machine is hacked and I can not believe "ls", "find" etc. commands ? Peter Rosa

er.... How to block Arp PAckages? []s

Hello, My company has been asked to help with the upgrade of several Freebsd systems that are pretty old. The customer is running a file server samba also running apache running FBSD 4.2, he wants to upgrade using cvsup & the make buildworld procedure to upgrade to 5.x. Im very familier with the make buildworld procedure however there have been significant changes between 4.2 & 5.x so is

Hello list. I would like to get your opinion on what is a safe multi-user environment. The scenario: We would like to offer to some customers of ours some sort of network backup/archive. They would put daily or weekly backups from their local machine on our server using rsync and SSH. Therefore, they all have a user account on our server. However, we must ensure that they would absolutely not be

that only works when you are presuming that the host was not hacked already because i would clear those logs when i hacked a system :) but indeed it's a try, If you remain unsure, it is best to reinstall the system to be sure that a fresh and newly updated (yeah update it when installed :)) system is not compromised at that time.. loads of work, but it gives you some relief to know that

Hi, FYI, Red Hat released an advisory today about a vulnerability in Ruby. So far it doesn't appear in the VuXML, but am I correct in presuming it will soon? https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0604.html http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3694 cheers, -- Joel Hatton -- Infrastructure Manager | Hotline: +61 7 3365 4417 AusCERT - Australia's national

Hi! Since linux-flashplugin7 r63 is vulnerable according to http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/7c75d48c-429b-11db-afae-000c6ec775d9.html isn't www/linux-seamonkey vulerable, too (it seems to include 7 r25)? Bye Arne __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

In my recent security email, I got the following errors: cantona.dnswatchdog.com login failures: Aug 20 02:37:19 cantona sshd[9444]: fatal: Write failed: Operation not permitted Aug 20 04:30:42 cantona sshd[16142]: fatal: Write failed: Operation not permitted Aug 20 21:21:51 cantona sshd[45716]: fatal: Write failed: Operation not permitted So three questions: What is it? Should I be worried?

I did not see any commits to the OpenSSL code, recently; is anybody going to commit the fix? See http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/480855/30/0 for details ... Regards, STefan

Colin, good day! Spotted two patches for x11-servers/xorg-server port: see entries for x11r6.9.0-dbe-render.diff and x11r6.9.0-cidfonts.diff at http://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/X11R6.9.0/patches/index.html Seems like they are not applied to the xorg-server-6.9.0_5. May be it should be added to the VuXML document? There is a ports/107733 issue that incorporates these patches. May be you

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-07:06.tcpdump Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Buffer overflow in tcpdump(1) Category: contrib Module: tcpdump Announced:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-07:06.tcpdump Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Buffer overflow in tcpdump(1) Category: contrib Module: tcpdump Announced:

http://www.isc.org/sw/bind/view/?release=9.3.4 SECURITY ADVISORIES * CVE-2006-4095 CERT Vulnerability Note VU#915404 NISCC 172003 * CVE-2006-4096 CERT Vulnerability Note VU#697164 NISCC 172003 * CAN-2005-0034 NISCC-UNIRAS 20050125-00059 CERT Vulnerability Note VU#938617 [ODiP] == Dmitry Grigorovich

Hi, I am using IPFW on FreeBSD 4.11 I am facing two problems: - SSH sessions timeout after a while - When I run "/sbin/ipfw -q -f flush" in the rules script all connection get reset (and I am thrown out of the box). Is this standard functioning of ipfw or do I need to change any configuration? Thanks, Siddhartha

Zitat von Remko Lodder <remko at freebsd.org>: Hi Remko, > Emails can only be read if they are authenticated / authorized in > someway to access the store. That means you might need to share the > info@ credentials with the other > people so that they can read it over imap or webmail etc. That is self-evident and it is not a problem. I can't understand what you

...Vulnerability - CVE-2007-6015" http://www.freshports.org/net/samba3/ ============================================================================ samba3 3.0.26a_2,1 <http://www.freshports.org/net/>net<http://www.freshports.org/faq.php#watchlistcount> <http://www.freshports.org/search.php?stype=depends_all&method=match&query=net/samba3>=220 FORBIDDEN:

Still not quite right for me. Jun 7 15:11:33 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync(lightning.reub.net): I/O has stalled, no activity for 600 seconds (last sent=mail, last recv=mail (EOL)) Jun 7 15:11:33 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: doveadm: Error: Timeout during state=sync_mails (send=mails recv=recv_last_common) I'm not sure if there is an underlying replication error

I have a server that has been compromised. I'm running version 4.6.2 when I do >last this line comes up in the list. shutdown ~ Thu Aug 28 05:22 That was the time the server went down. There seemed to be some configuration changes. Some of the files seemed to revert back to default versions (httpd.conf, resolv.conf) Does anyone have a clue what type of

We have had another instance of this..... since I am forwarding to other lists, "this" involves a lost file, due to accidental deletion. in this case, we had a backup, but from the backup time, till deletion time, a lot of data had been lost. So, we have not enough disk space to do hourly backups, novell allowed recovery of a lost file like this, so: is there a filesystem that we

> On 16 Sep 2015, at 19:10, Mark Foley <mfoley at ohprs.org> wrote: > > Does the Dovecot NTLM mechanism work with MS Outlook? > > [ ] YES > [ ] NO > > Please check one ... anybody. > > ?Mark The URL on the wiki, which had probably been shared before with you; http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/ActiveDirectoryNtlm suggests it does. The URL quotes: Step 5.