similar to: Dubious ifconfig / tcpdump behaviour

Is there a tinydns or dns wizard that could give me some hints, please? I am setting up and testing tinydns, but have some problems figuring out how to route. I do get dnscache to listen on tinydns. Also I do not understand why it will not answer the given ip (127.0.0.1) to the name server. 1. Both services are up running and seems to be working fine, so why no reply, (on the first

Hello listmates, Somehow or other my DNS services that are part of the ndjbdns-1.06-1.el7.x86_64 package would not start properly at startup. When I then start them up using systemctl: systemctl start dnscache systemctl start tinydns they start just fine. >From the log I got the following for tinydns: Oct 24 15:01:43 ns99 tinydns[1867]: tinydns: version 1.06: starting: Oct-24 2014 15:01:43

Use BIND. How the times have changed. :-) PS: I'm also curious for a solution.. for when djbnostalgia hits me. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Boris Epstein" <borepstein at gmail.com> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > Sent: Tuesday, 13 January,

Thanks for getting back with the "solution". You might want to give that bugzilla entry a jolt, it's been stagnating since last year. :-) Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Boris Epstein" <borepstein at gmail.com> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at

Hello all, We have put a DNS server online running DJBDNS v1.06 (ndjbdns-1.06-1.el6.x86_64) on a 64-bit CentOS 6.6 server. We have done some limited testing on the machine which it passed - i.e., dnscache was talking to tinydns, the queries went through fine, etc. As soon as we put it online subjecting it to live load the following happened: 1) Within a short time period (about a minute) the

I'm workign to setup Samba4 and my current centos server deployment uses TinyDNS/DNSCache for the DNS. Understanding that it is best to use Sambas internal DNS for AD, I'm wondering how others are doing DNS? I really don't want to use BIND. Should my DHCP server send ddns updates to Samba's internal DNS for client leases? Thanks, -- Greg J. Zartman Board Member Koozali

On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Greg Zartman <gzartman at koozali.org> wrote: > I'm workign to setup Samba4 and my current centos server deployment uses > TinyDNS/DNSCache for the DNS. Understanding that it is best to use Sambas > internal DNS for AD, I'm wondering how others are doing DNS? I really > don't want to use BIND. > > Should my DHCP server send

Lucian, So far here is the best we could find out: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084747 Testing to see if this is the solution; so far it seems to be. Cheers, Boris. On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote: > Use BIND. How the times have changed. :-) > > PS: I'm also curious for a solution.. for when djbnostalgia hits me. > >

On 07/05/2019 01:43 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 05/07/2019 18:59, Robert A Wooldridge via samba wrote: >> Is it necessary to use Samba's DNS when configuring as a domain >> controller?? Can a DNS server be used on a different machine? >> > The dns server must be authoritative for the AD dns domain but you do > not need to use the Samba internal dns

Hi, Our firm has developed two applications that I thought might be of interest to members of this list as both run over Asterisk: The first is a calling card application that covers needs in that area: scratch number generation, call termination via least-cost route (i.e. multiple termination providers), etc. We have tested this with voicepulse as our termination provider and it works great.

On 07/05/2019 02:11 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 05/07/2019 20:03, Robert A Wooldridge via samba wrote: >> On 07/05/2019 01:55 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> I currently run tinydns and dnscache on my proxy machine.? I was >>> hoping to keep that going.? I have a Windows Server2004 doing DC >>> work right now.? Need to update that.

Hi there, I've been a happy djbdns+tinydns user for many, many years. I want to keep using it, so answers of the form "bletch! Use ISC BIND the way BSD intended" will be ignored :-) Having said that, one annoying consequence of my transition some time ago to using ntpd, rather than just setting the clock once-off with ntpdate as I used to, is that the /etc/rc.d mechanism starts

I am having two problems, possibly related, while performing pre-deployment testing of a Samba/OpenLDAP PDC with data that was vampired from an NT4 PDC. The Samba server fails to become a local master browser, and password change attempts (from a Windows client) fail. I followed Samba-Guide/ntmigration.html (taking some liberties with various items of configuration), ending with step #19.

The setup: My VMWare host is Debian 2.4.24, and runs Samba 3.0.2a-Debian, on fixed IP address 10.0.0.9. Other computers can see and use services on this server. Samba is browse master and domain master browser for the workgroup. An external host runs dnscache and a tinydns for the local domain. VMWare is 3.2.0 build-2230, configured with bridged networking only (though I previously tried both

On 07/05/2019 01:55 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > I currently run tinydns and dnscache on my proxy machine.? I was > hoping to keep that going.? I have a Windows Server2004 doing DC work > right now.? Need to update that. >> >> -- >> Bob Wooldridge >> > You can run a caching nameserver that forwards your AD dns zones to > your AD DC, but you can

Hi I've got rsync setup to replicate DNS for an irc network I help run. I'm the primary DNS, so I use the rsync client to connect to a friend running another DNS server, and he has the rsync daemon setup. the conf is as follows log file = /root/rsync.log [tinydns] path = /etc/tinydns/root/ use chroot = no max connections = 2 read only = false list = false uid = root

Hi all, tinydns starts up fine, selinux reports no issues (now after a day of clearing errors). If I turn selinux back to permissive in /etc/sysconfig/selinux, and reboot, tinydns responds to queries. If I turn selinux back to enforcing and reboot, tinydns does not respond. Monitoring /var/log/messages shows no errors from iptables/shorewall or selinux. The only way I can find an error is

hello, i have a FreeBSD 4.8-PRERELEASE #0 that i use as a gateway / nat box for my home. It also acts as a dns / mail server to the outside world. I'm using ipf and basically filter for bogus networks on the way in and out. I allow everything out keeping state, and allow this in: pass in proto icmp from any to any icmp-type squench group 200 pass in proto icmp from any to any icmp-type timex

Dear all, I initially ran into this problem while rebuilding a package dependent on nleqslv. I got the following error: Error in match.arg(global) : 'arg' must be of length 1 This didn't occur in previous versions of nleqslv, but did in the current one (2.4). I think I pinned the problem down to the following example: Take two functions: test <-

Hello Wouter, We used tinydns for many years. After migration to nsd3 we miss only one feature present in tinydns only: tinydns may switch addresses by decreasing the ttl for old data and serve new data starting from a fixed timestamp. http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/tinydns-data.html: You may include a timestamp on each line. If ttl is nonzero (or omitted), the timestamp is a starting time for the