similar to: OpenVPN routing question

Hi! I''m trying to create a routed VPN using OpenVPN - and having trouble with the routing concepts involved. Let me see if I can properly describe my current topology: Server - LAN, with both local workstations and remote bridged workstations on the 192.168.0.0/24 network (this works without reservation). Server located at 192.168.0.71, 192.168.0.72, 192.168.0.222, and few

Hi, I am running OpenVPN where i have one central hub VPN server, and multiple spoke VPN clients. I can ping from each client to the server and each client to computers on the subnet which the server resides (192.168.2.0/24) so it works ok there. I cannot however, ping from one client to another client. I guess the packet path would go: clienta -> vpn -> shorewall/router -> vpn ->

Hello listmates, We are working on setting up two private networks linked by a public network which is fast (1 Gbit/s) but potentially insecure. Since the hosts on our two networks need to talk to each other, and do so securely, we have decided to use OpenVPN to connect them, making one gateway a server and the other a client. The connectivity part was easy to establish and worked like a charm.

Hello listmates, I've got this Centos 5.5 box which I am trying to configure as an OpenVPN server. Now 2.1.4 seems to have added pkcs11 support and that stops me from creating the CA and other necessary files: [root at gw5fl 2.0]# . ./vars bash: /usr/share/doc/openvpn-2.1.4/easy-rsa/2.0/whichopensslcnf: Permission denied NOTE: If you run ./clean-all, I will be doing a rm -rf on

Hello, I have the need to connect 2 remote site with vpn, the windows pc of the 2 site it can share the HD and printer. This is my configuration : LOCAL NETWORK A : ip from 192.168.10.2 to 192.168.10.99 | | | | eth0: 192.168.10.1 FIREWALL A : ( with debian ; openvpn ver. 2.0.beta15 ; shorewall ver 2.0.11 ) eth1 : xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx ( pubblic ip address ) | | | | INTERNET | | | eth1 :

Hi, with recent guest installs (both centos 5 and 7) on centos 7 hosts I seem to have to disable checksum offloading using "ethtool -K eth0 tx off" in order to allow traffic to flow a specific route. Basically the guest is installed with IP 192.168.21.10 and a default gateway of 192.168.21.254. Up until that point I can ssh into the system normally. There exists an OpenVPN System with

Apologies for the cross-posting to CentOS list (already mailed to OpenVPNlist).. am using OpenVPN [ http://openvpn.sf.net ] on CentOS 3.4 and having some issues.. it may possibly be an OpenVPN issue, but thought if anyone on this list is using or had any similar issues or have any thoughts.. TIA ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:26:22 -0700 Subject: resend with

How do I insert the iptables rule below using firewalld? I'm moving up from CentOS 6 to 7 on an office gateway and I'm trying to get OpenVPN working to allow home workers to access PCs at the office. I've got it all working but only by manually inserting an ACCEPT rule in the FORWARD iptables chain: iptables -I FORWARD 3 -i tun+ -j ACCEPT This rule was extracted from my iptables

Hello All, I would like to use OpenVPN with Samba 4 AD using the LDAP Auth plugin. However, my tests come up with the following errors in the OpenVPN... LDAP bind failed: Strong(er) authentication required (BindSimple: Transport encryption required.) Unable to bind as CN=VPN Connect,CN=Users,DC=MYDOMAIN,DC=COM LDAP connect failed. PLUGIN_CALL: POST

Hi all, first time that i tried to use xen. My goal is to reach in ssh all the domUs after i manage to get a connection through openvpn. Like they were real servers. I installed the openvpn server on my dom0 (ubuntu 9.04 + default package + latest debian-xen-amd64 kernel) After connecting to the openvpn server I''m able to do direct ssh just to the dom0. For reaching domU i had do it with

Hi, I have some problems with my OpenVPN server in a Xen DomU. OpenVPN works fantastic but theres a problem connecting other DomUs on this server. I have the following iptable rule to forward the requests to the internet. iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.8.0.0/24 -j MASQUERADE This works fine. I can connect to other DomUs on the same server but they can''t answer the

Hi, I had some performance problems with TINC running on Windows XP. I had a VPN tunnel running over a wireless network to a Linux VPN server. Web browsing through the tunnel was a pain. Big web pages with lots of pictures loaded very slow compared to a plain network connection. When the VPN client was running on a Linux computer, and a Windows computer was browsing the web through the VPN

It's just come to my attention that newer phones from both Snom and Grandstream support OpenVPN. Is this a new trend or something? Since OpenVPN, in one swell foop, deals with both NAT issues and securing communications, I'd be very interested in hearing if other phone vendors were embracing OpenVPN as well. (Other VPN solutions are all well and good, but I really like the flexibility

I am trying to make the following connection: WindowsXP(OpenVPN-Client)->shorewall->Internet->LinksysWRTG->OpenVPN-Server ...of course the reverse path too. The OpenVPN server is running in bridge mode. When the openVPN client is launched it looks like a successful connection is made. The openVPN client gets assigned an address from the openVPN server pool. The OpenVPN

Hi all. I have an OpenVPN server: 2.2.1-1 x86_64 Server config: port 11223 dev tap proto udp tls-server ca keys/ca.crt cert keys/server.crt key keys/server.key dh keys/dh1024.pem server 1.2.3.3 255.255.255.0 push "route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 1.2.3.4" keepalive 10 60 client-to-client duplicate-cn inactive 600 log /var/log/openvpn.log syslog status /var/log/openvpn-status.log user

Shorewall can run without openvpn, but you need it if you want to establish private networks through public structures. -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: info@kws-netzwerke.de [mailto:info@kws-netzwerke.de] Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Juni 2006 12:52 An: 'Shorewall Users' Betreff: AW: [Shorewall-users] OpenVPN question Shorewall is able to work with openvpn but it isn´t a bundle of a

Hi, I'm running Centos 5 32bit and installed openvpn-2.0.9-1.el5.rf from Dag Wieers Repo. When OpenVPN is started during boot-up it just shows an SElinux related error message. When I start OpenVPN manually after the system has come up completely it works fine. Here are all the messages from /var/log/messages that are SElinux related: May 28 21:39:15 srsblnfw01 kernel:

Hi all, I''m trying to use OpenVPN as a VPN solution on a firewall running Shorewall. The IPSEC VPN I tried first has shown a little bit unstable under several conditions, especially with Windows clients. As OpenVPN is best run in ''bridged'' mode (see http://fedoranews.org/contributors/florin_andrei/openvpn/), I became interested in the bridge capabilities of

I have a workgroup server with samba operating well and have configured openvpn on it. That also seems to be working well. I also have other servers at different locations with samba/openvpn working. To access the openvpn server I use Windows and manually map a drive to a drive letter using U: as \\servername\sharename The shares work but I am mapping _through_ the samba server - that is I have

Greetings, I want to setup bandwidth restrictions for a few clients that use openvpn to connect to my server. I''m using iptables to mark the packets in the mangle table (PRE/POSTROUTING) on eth0 before they get sent via the tunnel. Will the mark survive even if the packets then get routed via an openvpn tunnel (tunX) out the box or does openvpn change it removing the mark ? damnit,