similar to: xfsaild causing load, and stuck in D state - Centos 6.4 x64

Hi. I get these ACPI errors constantly every 5min or so in /var/log/messages and dmesg : kernel: ACPI Error: SMBus or IPMI write requires Buffer of length 42, found length 20 (20090903/exfield-286) kernel: ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PMI0._PMM] (Node ffff88061056cb00), AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT kernel: ACPI Exception: AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT, Evaluating _PMM

Hi there. I'm currently configuring a brand new email server(IMAP) which will run CentOS 6.3 x64. So lots of files on the data volume. I'm confused about stripe size for my data volume. I'm using 2x500GB for OS in RAID1 and 2x2TB SAS for DATA in RAID1 which is hosted on a HP Smart Array P420 Controller with 1GB in Cache/Battery Backed Up. Both these array's are on the P420

Centos 6.2 system with xfs filesystem. I'm sharing this filesystem using nfs. When I create a 10 gigabyte test file from a nfs client system : dd if=/dev/zero of=10Gtest bs=1M count=10000 10000+0 records in 10000+0 records out 10485760000 bytes (10 GB) copied, 74.827 s, 140 MB/s Output from 'ls -al ; du' during this test : -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 429170688 Jun 8 10:13 10Gtest

commit 763769621d271d92204ed27552d75448587c1ac0 Author: Dor Laor <dor.laor@qumranet.com> Date: Wed Dec 12 14:52:00 2007 +0200 [virtio-net][PATCH] Don't arm tx hrtimer with a constant 50us each transmit The current start_xmit sets 500us hrtimer to kick the host. The problem is that if another xmit happens before the timer was fired then the first xmit will have to

commit 763769621d271d92204ed27552d75448587c1ac0 Author: Dor Laor <dor.laor@qumranet.com> Date: Wed Dec 12 14:52:00 2007 +0200 [virtio-net][PATCH] Don't arm tx hrtimer with a constant 50us each transmit The current start_xmit sets 500us hrtimer to kick the host. The problem is that if another xmit happens before the timer was fired then the first xmit will have to

I've been back at it, and still am unable to get more than one of my physical nodes to come online in ovirt, nor am I able to get more than the two gluster volumes (storage domains) to show online within ovirt. In Storage -> Volumes, they all show offline (many with one brick down, which is correct: I have one server off) However, in Storage -> domains, they all show down (although

Hi all again: I'm now subscribed to gluster-users as well, so I should get any replies from that side too. At this point, I am seeing acceptable (although slower than I expect) performance much of the time, with periodic massive spikes in latency (occasionally so bad as to cause ovirt to detect a engine bad health status). Often, if I check the logs just then, I'll see those call traces

-----Original Message----- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Noam Bernstein Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2017 8:54 AM To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Subject: [CentOS] Areca RAID controller on latest CentOS 7 (1708 i.e. RHEL 7.4) kernel 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64 > Is anyone running any Areca RAID controllers with the latest CentOS 7 kernel, >

CentOS 7.4 client mounting a CentOS 7.4 server filesystem over nfs4. nfs seems to be much slower since the upgrade to 7.4, so I thought it might be nice to mount the directory as v4.0 rather than the new default of v4.1 to see if it makes a difference. The release notes state, without an example: "You can retain the original behavior by specifying 0 as the minor version" nfs(5)

Is anyone running any Areca RAID controllers with the latest CentOS 7 kernel, 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64? We recently updated (from 3.10.0-514.26.2.el7.x86_64), and we?ve started having lots of problems. To add to the confusion, there?s also a hardware problem (either with the controller or the backplane most likely) that we?re in the process of analyzing. Regardless, we have an ARC1883i, and

Hello guys, Did anyone noticed how green CentOS 6 is compared to the previous release? I've been running a couple of "CentOS 6" VMs (on our vSphere environment) for the last couple of weeks and noticed a BIG difference when it comes to CPU usage when the VM is completely idle. I would like to share what I've seen in our environment: PfSense 2.0 (FreeBSD) VM: 40 Mhz CentOS

The profile seems to suggest very high latencies on the brick at ovirt1.nwfiber.com:/gluster/brick1/engine ovirt2.* shows decent numbers. Is everything OK with the brick on ovirt1? Are the bricks of engine volume on both these servers identical in terms of their config? -Krutika On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Jim Kusznir <jim at palousetech.com> wrote: > Hi: > > Thank you. I

Hi, on my c6.3 server (guest of a vmware host) I have a strange load average value: w command: > [root at s-doc ~]# w > 11:19:23 up 41 days, 23:15, 1 user, load average: 4,03, 4,03, 4,00 > USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT > root pts/2 dodo:S.0 11:15 0.00s 0.02s 0.00s w top command: > top - 12:13:31 up 42 days, 9 min, 1

hello tincers, when I on battery on my notebook, running powertop, I get nic:<tinc-net-name> as the most power consuption resource in my notebook just after the screen. This happens no matter if I have traffic or not. I am not really sure that if this is really a tinc fault or a tap/tun implementation that never sleeps. any advice? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hello Mailing List I got a severe network error message at a HP DL360 Server. The kernel log says: ----------------------------------- /var/log/messages ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mar 19 15:45:06 server kernel: do_IRQ: 2.168 No irq handler for vector (irq -1) Mar 19 15:45:17 server kernel: bnx2 0000:02:00.1: eth1: DEBUG: intr_sem[0] PCI_CMD[00100446] Mar 19

Hi, I have quite a few low-end development/test servers running continuously and I would like to better manage their power consumption. I have found interesting information on how to perform CPU scaling (e.g. [1] or [2]). But I cannot find if there is a way to (software) monitor power consumption on CentOS (or other such data like CPU temperature, fan speed etc.). What I read so far is that

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 3:16 AM, Jim Kusznir <jim at palousetech.com> wrote: > I've been back at it, and still am unable to get more than one of my > physical nodes to come online in ovirt, nor am I able to get more than the > two gluster volumes (storage domains) to show online within ovirt. > > In Storage -> Volumes, they all show offline (many with one brick down,

Hi, I would have filed this as a bug but bugs.xiph.org doesn't seem to work (despite quite enthusiastically claiming to :)). So here goes: I'm seeing quite a few wakeups/sec in icecast2 2.3.2 on Debian Testing. In fact, whether icecast is doing anything or not, powertop reports 44.3 wakeups per second. This is pretty big number, on my laptop it means icecast alone is responsible for

Hello, I was not happy with the power consumption of CentOS 6 x86_64 on a new Lenovo Thinkpad x220 Tablet and I worked on reducing it. I just wanted to share with the list one of the changes which gave me the most significant improvement. As per http://www.williambrownstreet.net/blog/?p=387, add the following kernel arguments to the GRUB boot configuration: pcie_aspm=force

From 7354db58f496b06369e57d9be87e9c84db087690 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dor Laor <dor.laor@qumranet.com> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:52:00 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Don't arm tx hrtimer with a constant 500us each transmit The current start_xmit sets 500us hrtimer to kick the host. The problem is that if another xmit happens before the timer was fired then the first xmit will have to