similar to: Kernel log output meaning

Hello freebsd-security, Apologize if it's offtopic, but: The message digest checksum for bpft4 from ports/net/bpft does not matchs the one printed on the sources page at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/pds.cgi?ports/net/bpft My digests are 3810114b068f438cc7e8e0b1af745953 from top 6 links. Only last ftp://rusunix.org/pub/FreeBSD/distfiles/bpft4-latest.tgz gave the right cheksum -

Hello freebsd-security! What is the best way to authenticate remote ssh users transparantly without typing the kinit and kdestroy commands? Using pam_krb5 works satisfactorily for local logins but makes it crooked for remote ssh ones. The comp.protocols.kerberos and comp.security.ssh newsgroups and the pam-krb5-users maillist confirm this assertion. As far as I understood that using kerberized

On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > I'm wondering what was the original motivaton for the 'select' > instruction. Was it for convenience, or for some deep reason. I'm > asking because it's causing me some problems (see below) and I'd like to > know I understand the situation before working those problems around. The select instruction is

Hello, I'm wondering what was the original motivaton for the 'select' instruction. Was it for convenience, or for some deep reason. I'm asking because it's causing me some problems (see below) and I'd like to know I understand the situation before working those problems around. I have the following function: int logsch(int ih,int nbh) { if(nbh < 0)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-03:07.sendmail Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: a second sendmail header parsing buffer overflow Category: contrib Module:

Hello freebsd-security, I've applied the patch from ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/patches/SA-03:12/buffer46.patch for my 4.8 stable last cvsuped at 20 aug 2003. Now 'ssh -l user localhost' says: ssh_exchange_identification: connection closed by remote host Trying remote connections have the same result. sshd.log with log level 'verbose' does not contains

Chris Lattner wrote: > The select instruction is basically an SSA-form "conditional move", or a > very simple form of predication. Integer codes often have very complex > CFG's which are usually doing simple things. For example, it's not > uncommon to see something like this: > > if (blah) > X = 14; > > If the body of the if statement is simple

On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > > int %logsch(int %ih, int %nbh) { > > > entry: > > > %tmp.1 = setlt int %nbh, 0 > > > %ih_addr.1 = select bool %tmp.1, int 10, int %ih > > > %nbh_addr.1 = select bool %tmp.1, int 0, int %nbh > > > %tmp.4 = setgt int %nbh_addr.1, 22528

Hi all! I've got a samba-3.0.14a-2 running on a single subnet. It has been my WINS server for a long time and has done well, until now. The dhcp server on the subnet is telling all clients to use the file server as WINS but when one of the employees here plugs in his XP Media Center Edition, browsing is failing. It's failing by only showing the file server, the XP MCE and eventually the

>Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 06:04:02 -0800 (PST) >From: Nash Nipples <trashy_bumper@yahoo.com> >To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: IPFW: Blocking me out. How to debug? > >Dear W.D. > >oh come on. i have the same problem. Which problem are we talking about? cut and paste problem. >cut and paste logic: > >#!/bin/sh >#1. count packets >#2.

Almost forgot - diff need ot be appied only on FreeBSD 5 version of 550.ipfwlimit, but resulting file can be used on both 4 and 5 releases. On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:59:51PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Better version then previos, it will not break order of rules. awk version, it will work on all 4 and 5 releases, at least those, where IPFW enabled ;-) Also i removed check for

heya i've been using freebsd's ipfw for quite a while and recently on a new server i've got this issue with ipfw that i can't understand ... something is wrong ... 01000 8042 1947866 allow ip from any to any via fxp0 01010 0 0 allow ip from any to any via lo0 01014 9886 4170269 divert 8668 ip from any to any in via vr0 01015 0 0 check-state 01130 14679 5695969 skipto 1800 ip from

Hi Illia, With Nouveau : xrandr: Failed to get size of gamma for output default Screen 0: minimum 1024 x 768, current 1024 x 768, maximum 1024 x 768 default connected 1024x768+0+0 0mm x 0mm 1024x768 76.0* With the Nvidia Driver : xrandr: Failed to get size of gamma for output default Screen 0: minimum 640 x 480, current 1280 x 1024, maximum 1280 x 1024 default connected

Hello, I'm using *virt-sparsify* for compressing image file [ash2] jenkins@b-imagebuilder-worker-r13h17-prod:~/workspace/imagebuilder/packer/output$ virt-sparsify --compress /data/home/jenkins/workspace/imagebuilder/packer/output/packer-vm.qcow2 /data/home/jenkins/workspace/imagebuilder/packer/output/packer-vm.qcow2.sparsified Input disk virtual size = 41943040000 bytes (39.1G) Create

Yes. I attached the logs. (There is several error messages.) Le 28/10/2014 21:43, Ilia Mirkin a écrit : > Output name 'default' is not the name of an output nouveau can produce > (or nvidia for that matter, afaik). This is the vesa driver or... > something. Can you supply xorg log + dmesg? > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Victor Lefèvre <victorlefevre at free.fr>

550.ipfwlimit check in /etc/periodic/security takes into account only global/default verbosity limit and does not account for a specific logging limit set for a particular rule e.g.: $ ipfw -a l | fgrep log 65000 *521* 41764 deny log logamount *1000* ip from any to any $ sysctl -n net.inet.ip.fw.verbose_limit *100* >From security run output: ipfw log limit reached: 65000 519

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi again, > >> On my NV18 based laptop I experience artifacts related to text >> (however, 2D performance is really great these days): >> - With grayscale AA text is sometimes missing, often visible on the XFCE desktop >> - With subpixel (rgb) AA, even non-text related occur

I've just realized that I see in releng/7 something that I did not see in releng/6 - even if I use a file with custom rules in firewall_type I still get default loopback rules installed. I think that this is not correct, I am using custom rules exactly because I want to control *everything* (e.g. all deny rules come with log logamount xxx). -- Andriy Gapon

-=> To moderator: I don't know whether it's wise to release the FTP-location I would recommend everyone to just look over their daemons, and run something like nessus against theirselves... Greetings, Jan-Philip Velders ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 16:26:59 -0700 From: "Ben Cantrick (Macky Stingray)" <mackys@MACKY.RONIN.NET> To:

Hi, While I was working, the follwing message flud the screen. Aug 13 23:32:28 www /kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 213 to 200 packets per second The /var/log/apache_ssl_engine.log started to grow with similar messages: [13/Aug/2004 23:43:49 66440] [error] SSL handshake failed (server www.beco.hu:443, client 217.102.90.240) (OpenSSL library error follows) [13/Aug/2004 23:43:49