Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Formatting a USB Drive"
2013 Apr 11
3
How to change 'fstab' when you cannot boot the machine?
Hello All,
So My Drobo finished formatting and I added an entry to fstab for it and
now I cannot boot the machine. I get an error about
fsck.ext3: is a directory while trying to open /drobo
and then a mention of a valid super block
I had mounted the Drobo as /drobo and in 'fstab' I copied the line for '/'
changing to ext3 where it was ext4.
I have made a mistake
I cannot fix
2014 Oct 05
1
CentOS 7 - Have 2 disks, each with a biosboot partition, can only boot off one of them
Hi all,
I used a kickstart script to setup a new machine of mine with RAID 1
(I couldn't get anaconda to create matching partition schemes). So I've
now got /dev/sdg1 and /dev/sdh1 as 'bios_grub' (/dev/sd{a-f} are a
separate array).
0 root at an-nas02:~# parted /dev/sdg print free
Model: ATA ST3000NC000 (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdg: 3001GB
Sector size (logical/physical):
2013 Feb 11
1
mdadm: hot remove failed for /dev/sdg: Device or resource busy
Hello all,
I have run into a sticky problem with a failed device in an md array,
and I asked about it on the linux raid mailing list, but since the
problem may not be md-specific, I am hoping to find some insight here.
(If you are on the MD list, and are seeing this twice, I humbly
apologize.)
The summary is that during a reshape of a raid6 on an up to date CentOS
6.3 box, one disk failed, and
2012 Sep 05
3
BTRFS thinks device is busy [kernel 3.5.3]
Hi,
I''m running OpenSuse 12.2 with kernel 3.5.3
HBA= LSI 1068e using the MPTSAS driver (patched)
(https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1379181/)
SANOS1:/media # uname -a
Linux SANOS1 3.5.3 #3 SMP Sun Sep 2 18:44:37 CEST 2012 x86_64 x86_64
x86_64 GNU/Linux
I''ve tried to simulate a disk replacement but it seems that now
/dev/sdg is stuck in the btrfs pool (RAID10)
SANOS1:/media #
2015 Jan 13
3
CentOS 6.6 64-bit won't install on a 3 TB disk
> I'm having an issue getting a C6.6 install to work on a 3 TB dual hard
>drive system, raid 0. I'm hoping that someone here can help.
1: Is this system booting UEFI or BIOS?
2: Is the disk partitioned with MBR or GPT?
3: Is /boot on its own partition?
3TB drives are larger than MBR and BIOS properly support, so they're
only really expected to work on a system partitioned with
2014 Jun 20
1
iostat results for multi path disks
Here is a sample of running iostat on a server that has a LUN from a SAN with multiple paths. I am specifying a device list that just grabs the bits related to the multi path device:
$ iostat -dxkt 1 2 sdf sdg sdh sdi dm-7 dm-8 dm-9
Linux 2.6.18-371.8.1.el5 (db21b.den.sans.org) 06/20/2014
Time: 02:30:23 PM
Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await
2010 Dec 16
1
use parted to create "raw paration"????
we have CENTOS 5.5 on X86. I tried to create a "raw partition" (NOT FS) on a disk and it continue to show "ext3". How can I get ride of it?
=== procedures=====
# parted /dev/sde
GNU Parted 1.8.1
Using /dev/sde
Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands.
(parted) p
Model: DELL PERC
2013 Sep 04
2
Error Attaching Seventh VirtIO-SCSI Device to Guest
I have run into a problem attempting to attach the seventh virtio-scsi device to a RHEL 6.4 Guest from a RHEL 6.4 host running libvirt version 0.10.2-18.
I have a guest that is running RHEL6.4 where I can attach disks sda(boot), sdb, sdc, sdd, sde and sdf but when I try to attach sdg the virsh attach-disk command fails with the error:
error: Failed to attach disk
error: internal error Unable to
2010 Feb 21
6
eSATA drive enclosure of a full PC?
HI All,
I have a dilemma and I would appreciate advice
1. Get a good size case, mobo, processor, etc and put 8 hard drives it in and RAID them. (yes an 8 port SATA mobo). Running CentOS.
or
2. Get an eSATA enclosure that has room for 8 or 10 drives and just connect it to box?
I know that RAID is not a full proof backup, but I am looking for a solution to store all of my data, projects, music,
2013 Sep 07
1
Re: Error Attaching Seventh VirtIO-SCSI Device to Guest
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Osier Yang [mailto:jyang@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 10:54 PM
> To: McEvoy, James
> Cc: libvirt-users@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] Error Attaching Seventh VirtIO-SCSI Device to Guest
>
> On 04/09/13 09:34, McEvoy, James wrote:
> > I have run into a problem attempting to attach the seventh
2015 Feb 27
2
OT: AF 4k sector drives with 512 emulation
Chris Murphy wrote:
<snip>
> The emulation implementations don't come into play if the alignment is
> correct from the start. The better implementations have significantly
> less pathological behavior if alignment is wrong, but that's
> anecdotal, I don't have any empirical data available. But I'd say in
> any case you want it properly aligned.
You really,
2016 May 25
6
Slow RAID Check/high %iowait during check after updgrade from CentOS 6.5 -> CentOS 7.2
I?ve posted this on the forums at https://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=57926&p=244614#p244614 - posting to the list in the hopes of getting more eyeballs on it.
We have a cluster of 23 HP DL380p Gen8 hosts running Kafka. Basic specs:
2x E5-2650
128 GB RAM
12 x 4 TB 7200 RPM SATA drives connected to an HP H220 HBA
Dual port 10 GB NIC
The drives are configured as one large
2016 May 27
2
Slow RAID Check/high %iowait during check after updgrade from CentOS 6.5 -> CentOS 7.2
All of our Kafka clusters are fairly write-heavy. The cluster in question is our second-heaviest ? we haven?t yet upgraded the heaviest, due to the issues we?ve been experiencing in this one.
Here is an iostat example from a host within the same cluster, but without the RAID check running:
[root at r2k1 ~] # iostat -xdmc 1 10
Linux 3.10.0-327.13.1.el7.x86_64 (r2k1) 05/27/16 _x86_64_ (32 CPU)
2009 Apr 04
1
Locally attached disk is seen, 40 gig PATA in USB enclosure is not.
Hi Folks,
When I boot ISOLinux, the locally attached disk is visible but the PATA
40 Gig in a USB attached enclosure is not. The locally attached disk
has no bearing on what I am doing and to avoid confusion will not be
mentioned again. Everything is happening on the 40 Gig.
Let me explain.
The goal is: Copy an installation iso to the disk, boot the disk and
install it on that disk. I have
2006 Sep 12
3
RE: Help: Xen HVM Domain can ONLY support four hard drivesat most???
>-----Original Message-----
>From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com
>[mailto:xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Liang Yang
>Sent: 2006年9月12日 8:57
>To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com
>Subject: [Xen-users] Help: Xen HVM Domain can ONLY support four hard
>drivesat most???
>
>Hi,
>
>I have 5 SATA hard drives and I want to expose all these five
2009 Jun 21
0
Rsync stops in the middle of a large transfer
Hello everyone. I am having trouble with rsync stopping in the middle of a
transfer. Everything works fine for smaller batches of file, but when I try
to rsync big groups, it just stops in the middle.
I have been using rsync to copy my home directory to an SD card. I recently
got a Drobo+Droboshare (NAS) and want to do the same thing to the Drobo, but
when I run rsync, it stops somewhere in
2007 Apr 17
0
Drobo
Here''s another product which has removed the hassle out of disk
management:
<http://www.drobo.com/products_demo.aspx>
I wonder if they (Data Robotics) will make the Drobo work with ZFS
once Leopard is out (since it supports HFS+)?
---8<---
Data Robotics has just introduced Drobo, the world?s first storage
robot. Drobo is a direct attached storage array that provides
2008 Aug 15
1
Hard disk, format, filesystem
Ok, I give up... I have to ask. This is CentOS 5.
I switched one of my raid1 disks, and I already thought I had succeeded. But
now it seems that something is very wrong with the first partition on the
new disk. Luckily my system is fully bootable with the other disk.
Here's some info. The new disk is sdb.
// I removed all partitions with parted, and created the first one again.
// parted
2010 May 28
2
permanently add md device
Hi All
Currently i'm setting up a 5.4 server and try to create a 3rd raid device, when i run:
$mdadm --create /dev/md2 -v --raid-devices=15 --chunk=32 --level=raid6 /dev/sdc /dev/sdd /dev/sde /dev/sdf /dev/sdg /dev/sdh /dev/sdi /dev/sdj /dev/sdk /dev/sdl /dev/sdm /dev/sdn /dev/sdo /dev/sdp /dev/sdq
the device file "md2" is created and the raid is being configured. but somehow
2004 Oct 13
1
i-node showing 100 % used whereas the partitions are empty
Output df -i
------------------
Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
/
/dev/sde 348548 348195 353 100% /ocfsa01
/dev/sdf 348548 348195 353 100% /ocfsa02
/dev/sdg 348548 348195 353 100% /ocfsa03
/dev/sdk 139410 138073 1337 100% /ocfsq01
Output df -kP
-----------------------
Filesystem