similar to: [PATCH 1/4] drm/nvc0: implement VRAM compression

Some registers were not initialized in init, this causes them to be uninitialized after suspend. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/ltcg/nvc0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/ltcg/nvc0.c index bcca883..7288940 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/ltcg/nvc0.c +++

Allocating type=0 marks the memory as free. This allows the ltcg memory to be allocated twice. Add a BUG_ON in core/mm.c to prevent this ever happening again. Additionally some registers were not initialized in init, this causes them to be uninitialized after suspend. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> --- diff --git

Some registers were not initialized in init, this causes them to be uninitialized after suspend. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/ltcg/nvc0.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/ltcg/nvc0.c

On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> wrote: > Some registers were not initialized in init, this causes them to be > uninitialized after suspend. > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> > --- > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/ltcg/nvc0.c

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54437 Bug #: 54437 Summary: linux-nouveau2.6 (3.6.0-rc4) : GTX580 : Xorg freezes when using accel Classification: Unclassified Product: xorg Version: git Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: critical

Hello, I've been debugging a few different tessellation shader issues with nouveau, but let's start small. I see this issue on my GK208 with high frequency, and I *think* I've seen it once or twice on my GF108, but it's exceedingly rare, if it does happen. I don't have a GK10x to test on, unfortunately, but I assume it'll have the same issue as the GK208. The issue is

Allocating type=0 marks the memory as free. This allows the ltcg memory to be allocated twice. Add a BUG_ON in core/mm.c to prevent this ever happening again. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/mm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/mm.c index d829172..7a4e089 100644 ---

Second version of this patchset. Not many changes since first version - I hope this means the changes are not too controversial. Changes since v1: - Removed lookup for previous FW files in "nouveau/" - Went back to using request_firmware() since we only try to load one file Original cover letter follows: GM20B is the GPU of the upcoming Tegra X1 SoC. This series adds initial support

Hello everyone, GM20B is the GPU of the upcoming Tegra X1 SoC. This series adds initial support for it, based on a rework of the already-supported GK20A. It also introduces support for NVIDIA-provided firmware files, which is why I have added a few NVIDIA people who are relevant to this discussion. The first patch adds support for loading the FECS and GPCCS firmwares from firmware files

One additional observation that I just made is that on GK208, the blob apparently doesn't use the result of S2R Rx, SR_INVOCATION_ID wholesale in TCS. It either passes it through a I2I.S32.S32 Rx, |Rx| (i.e. absolute value), or even more paradoxically, shl 2; shr 2; which removes the top *2* bits, rather than just the top 1. However I see no such behaviour on GF108. I'm going to test out

Kernel panic caused by list corruption in ltcg seems to indicate a concurrency issue. Take mutex of pfb like nv50_ram_put() to eliminate concurrency. Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <r.spliet at student.tudelft.nl> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramnvc0.c | 13 ++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git

Kernel panic caused by list corruption in ltcg seems to indicate a concurrency issue. Take mutex of pfb like nv50_ram_put() to eliminate concurrency. V2: Separate critical section into separate function, avoid taking the lock twice on NVC0 Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <r.spliet at student.tudelft.nl> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/priv.h | 2 +-

v2: read, don't assume.. *puts on brown paper bag* --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/ltcg/nvc0.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/ltcg/nvc0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/ltcg/nvc0.c index a529563..e4940fb 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/ltcg/nvc0.c +++

Now it outputs: nouveau E[ PGRAPH][0000:02:00.0] PGRAPH TLB flush idle timeout fail nouveau E[ PGRAPH][0000:02:00.0] PGRAPH_STATUS: BUSY DISPATCH VFETCH CCACHE_UNK4 STRMOUT_GSCHED_UNK5 UNK14XX UNK1CXX CLIPID ZCULL ENG2D UNK34XX TPRAST TPROP ROP (0x011fde03) nouveau E[ PGRAPH][0000:02:00.0] PGRAPH_VSTATUS: CCACHE (0x00145b4d) (0x0000002d) ENG2D ROP (0x0034db40) instead of: [drm] nouveau

Now it outputs: nouveau E[ PGRAPH][0000:02:00.0] PGRAPH TLB flush idle timeout fail nouveau E[ PGRAPH][0000:02:00.0] PGRAPH_STATUS: BUSY DISPATCH VFETCH CCACHE_UNK4 STRMOUT_GSCHED_UNK5 UNK14XX UNK1CXX CLIPID ZCULL ENG2D UNK34XX TPRAST TPROP ROP (0x011fde03) nouveau E[ PGRAPH][0000:02:00.0] PGRAPH_VSTATUS_0: CCACHE (0x00145b4d) nouveau E[ PGRAPH][0000:02:00.0] PGRAPH_VSTATUS_1: (0x0000002d)

Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- I made the assumption that showing the address is generally useful. Worst case, it won't make sense but still be displayed. Seems simpler than special-casing things. drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/graph/nv50.c | 117 ++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) diff --git

Here are a few small fixes for issues we found while implementing support for GM20B. The first two are specific to Tegra/GK20A, but the last 3 patches may have a broader (hopefully beneficial) effect. Note that the newly introduced gf100_gr_wait_idle() function on patch 5/5 is exported on purpose. GK20A and GM20B drivers will soon make use of it. Ben, since you seemed to like these changes, a

I have a list of polygons generated by the contourLines() command (each object of the list is a list in itself with two objects: a vector of x values, and a vector of y values for each vertex). I wish to convert that list into a gpc.poly object of multiple contours. How do I do this? gpclib apparently has no method of coercing lists into the gpc.poly object type. As well, when I have a

I've been trying to get some code to run on a 64-bit FreeBSD machine running R : Copyright 2006, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Version 2.3.0 (2006-04-24) ISBN 3-900051-07-0 and keep getting a core dump with the following results: *** caught segfault *** address 0x0, cause 'unknown' Traceback: 1: .Call("R_point_in_polygon_sp", as.numeric(point.x),

Hi, I have a tar.gz file. Using $tar -xzvf 'filename', I untarred the file. However, I found that the content is .PGC files (e.g. ISCCP.D2.0.GLOBAL.1983.07.99.0000.GPC ). I have tried to search for analysis of gpc data file in R. I have not been successful to get a good tip. I would be pleased if anybody could tell me if gpc analysis is implemented in R. Is there a program I must first