similar to: Win32 service question

Hi, I''ve done some benchmarking on our new servers (being built now), AMD X2 5600, gentoo-hardened. With the same CFLAGS (safe cflags: -march=k8 -O2) I''ve tested the following configs: 1, emerge ruby rubygems, then gem install mongrel (or emerge mongrel, the performance was similar) 2, download the same ruby version, untar, ./configure, make, make install, download rubygems,

Hi, I use Mongrel to serve my Rails applications on my server, but how can I serve more than one application with one mongrel server? Thanks. -jec -- Best regards / Salutations. Jean-Eric Cuendet Senior developer / Technical support Riskpro Technologies SA Av. Louis-Ruchonnet 2 CH-1003 Lausanne Switzerland Direct : +41 21 637 0123 Principal : +41 21 637 0110 Fax : +41 21 637 0111

Hello Guys, I''m reviewing the code for 1.9, and forgot about this when we first spoke on this subject. The current way we stop threads is using Thread#raise to spread StopServer exception, which will not work as expected in 1.9. 1.9 will treat raised exceptions as #kill, like JRuby does, so the worker threads will not finish serving the client and _then_ exiting, but will be

So here''s a random question: if a (Ruby) multi-threaded rails server could exist (bug free), would it be faster than using a mongrel cluster? (I.e. 10 mongrel processes versus 10 Ruby threads). I''m not sure if it would. RAM it might save, though. Any thoughts? -Roger -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello, I''m running a Rails application which must sort and manipulate a lot of data which are loaded in memory. The Rails app runs on 2 mongrel processes. When I first load the app, both are 32Mb in memory. After some days, both are between 200Mb and 300Mb. My question is : is there some kind of garbage collector in Mongrel? I never see the two Mongrel processes memory footprint

Hello I''ve a client which send this request to a mongrel HTTPHandler : res=Net::HTTP.post_form(URI.parse(''http://localhost:3000/test''),{"a"=>1,"b"=>2}) But in the handler I can''t read the parameters one by one, I can read the entire String only : class Serveur class MyHandler < Mongrel::HttpHandler def process(req, resp)

Hi all, After updating llvm+clang to r174701 by issuing make -j8 happiness The build fails with: ... make[2]: Entering directory `/local/csaba/LLVM/build-release/tools/llvm-diff' llvm[2]: Compiling DiffConsumer.cpp for Release+Asserts build llvm[2]: Linking Release+Asserts executable lli (without symbols) llvm[2]: Compiling CrashDebugger.cpp for Release+Asserts build

it would seem that the future ocfs2 (0.99.16>) builds will not support =< 2.6.12 kernels "out of the box" or am i missing something? 0.99.13 will build with a RHEL4 kernel, but later vers fail with the configure check on generic_drop_inode. the patch to fix it seems simple enough, however it seems that even if this was an rpm, youd have to rebuild your kernel before proceeding.

On Thursday, December 08, 2011 02:46:39 AM Csaba Raduly wrote: > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Richard Pennington wrote: > > I compiled a program and standard library using clang/LLVM and found the > > results interesting: > > > > text data bss dec hex filename > > 141312 4076 16668 162056 27908 bzip2.arm > > 131764 4076

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Richard Pennington wrote: > On Thursday, December 08, 2011 02:46:39 AM Csaba Raduly wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Richard Pennington  wrote: >> > I compiled a program and standard library using clang/LLVM and found the >> > results interesting: >> > >> >   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename

Hello, the voice-communication TeamSpeak (www.teamspeak.org) is currently testing a version that supports speex codecs. The quality for high bitrates is quite good. BUT, the low-bandwidth speex codecs that are currently used arent very good. What I did to find this out: I comprared a speex AVB with 6.3 KBit/sec (total, overhead for packets and stuff included) and the 6.3 Kbit/sec Celp Codec

Hi, my mongrel has crashed with following errors in the logfile: ** Starting Rails with development environment... ** Rails loaded. ** Loading any Rails specific GemPlugins ** Signals ready. TERM => stop. USR2 => restart. INT => stop (no restart). ** Rails signals registered. HUP => reload (without restart). It might not work well. ** Mongrel 1.1.3 available at 0.0.0.0:3000 **

Hi, could anybody suggest a usable doorphone and magnetic door opener "hardphone" system for me, please? Of course should be connectable to asterisk. I am in the EU, should be available here. thank you, Csaba

Ok, a refinement of the question I asked yesterday (If there were any replies from yesterday I don''t have access to them here .. sorry if I''m duplicating anybody''s words here). How can one host multiple domains with mongrel? Assuming you are mass vhosting and you also want the performance benefits of using mongrel ... As far as I can tell, one could set up a

Hi, Two days ago, the test suite started failing. Initially there were hundreds of failing tests; now only seven remain. They appear to be related to SystemZ. Here's the last failed test: ******************** FAIL: LLVM :: MC/Disassembler/SystemZ/unmapped.txt (11484 of 14435) ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: MC/Disassembler/SystemZ/unmapped.txt' FAILED ******************** Script:

Guys, Just for fun, I tried to see (I know, a silly way to test it) how much overhead we have calling the C functions of the extensions. the benchmark script and the results: http://pastie.caboo.se/128646 The naive C extension: http://pastie.caboo.se/128647 I compared 1.8.6 (VC6 and mingw builds) against a fresh checkout of ruby trunk. What I understand from that is 1.9 is slower than 1.8

Hi all, LLVM+clang builds fine under Cygwin 1.7, but "make check-all" fails to run because lit doesn't find the freshly built clang. The reason is as follows: in llvm/utils/lit/lit/Util.py, in the "which" method, there's 66: # Get suffixes to search. 67: pathext = os.environ.get('PATHEXT', '').split(os.pathsep) The problem is, PATHEXT is imported

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 16 May 2013 09:01, Csaba Raduly <rcsaba at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> "s390x--linux-gnu" seems wrong: either there's a dash too many or a >> word too few. > > > Nope, this triple is correct. The canonicalization of the triple (actually a > quadruple)

******************** FAIL: LLVM :: tools/llvm-dwarfdump/X86/debug-names-find.s (38881 of 41794) ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: tools/llvm-dwarfdump/X86/debug-names-find.s' FAILED ******************** Script: -- /home/csabaraduly/wk/LLVM/build_release/bin/llvm-mc -triple x86_64-pc-linux /home/csabaraduly/wk/LLVM/llvm/test/tools/llvm-dwarfdump/X86/debug-names-find.s -filetype=obj -o

Hello Mongrels, Mongrel 1.1 is out with fullblown JRuby support, some reorganization, and some bugfixes. Also, Mongrel_cluster has been updated to 1.0.4. Go subscribe to the all-new news feed, because we probably won''t announce to the list anymore: http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/rss.xml Thanks Evan, and the Mongrel Team -- Evan Weaver Cloudburst, LLC