Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "nsd4 process weirdness?"
2012 Nov 28
1
Build error of NSD4 on Debian Squeeze
Hello World,
I am trying to build NSD4 on Debian Squeeze and I get the following
errors when running `make`.
```
$ pwd
/home/wiz/src/nsd/tags/NSD_4_0_0_imp_5
$ make
[... output omitted ...]
gcc -g -O2 -o nsd-checkconf answer.o axfr.o buffer.o configlexer.o
configparse
acket.o query.o rbtree.o radtree.o rdata.o region-allocator.o tsig.o
tsig-opens
4_pton.o b64_ntop.o -lcrypto
configparser.o: In
2013 Oct 31
1
systemd service files for nsd4?
Hi
I'm starting a migration from NSD 3 -> 4.
I note in @src ./contrib/ that an init.d is still provided.
Are there any systemd service files, etc.
available/documented/recommended yet?
darx
2013 Jan 28
1
Featurerequest for nsd4
Hello Wouter,
We used tinydns for many years. After migration to nsd3 we miss only one feature present in tinydns only:
tinydns may switch addresses by decreasing the ttl for old data and serve new data
starting from a fixed timestamp.
http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/tinydns-data.html:
You may include a timestamp on each line. If ttl is nonzero (or omitted),
the timestamp is a starting time for the
2013 Nov 19
2
* CNAME loop
Hi,
I'm testing:
$ sudo nsd-control status
version: 4.0.1
verbosity: 2
I found a loop problem with this record:
* IN CNAME none
("none" means no matching record in zone and therefore match * again)
Queries that use "* CNAME" will result in a loop. The response will use TCP
and will be limited to 65k bytes
$ dig @127.0.0.1 sdfgsfg.test.com
;; Truncated,
2019 Dec 28
2
tinydns to nsd
On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 17:02:09 +0100
richard lucassen via nsd-users <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:
> The problem is (was) that I used "include:" statements in nsd.conf
> to load zone information. Apparently nsd does not reread the include
> files upon a SIGHUP. I scripted everything into 1 file and a HUP
> rereads the zone info now.
Wrong, I made a mistake it
2024 Jan 12
1
error: cannot write zone : Permission denied
Hello,
NSD 4.8.0 running on FreeBSD 13.2-RELEASE-p9 and serving both plain
and DNSSEC signed zones.
I noticed Permission denied errors in the logs for all domains listed
in nsd.conf:
[2024-01-12 12:20:05.710] nsd[8655]: info: writing zone
domain-plain.org to file domain-plain.org
[2024-01-12 12:20:05.710] nsd[8655]: error: cannot write zone
domain-plain.org file domain-plain.org~: Permission
2013 Nov 06
1
Frequent RRL false negatives when using multiple server processes on Linux
Hi,
Please advise how to use Response Rate Limiting on a server which has
multiple NSD server processes (nsd.conf server section has server-count
> 1).
We have a problem with NSD v3.2.16 repeatedly unblocking and blocking
again a single source which is flooding positive queries at a ~steady
700 qps rate. rrl-ratelimit setting is the default 200 qps. The
unblock-block happens multiple times
2008 Jan 15
1
problem using nsd
Hello I have this problem since a week or so:
The nsd daemon crashes unexpectedly and the nsd log files shows this:
[1200299533] nsd[3736]: info: XSTATS 1200299533 1200298484 RR=0 RNXD=0
RFwdR=0 RDupR=0 RFail=0 RFErr=0 RErr=0 RAXFR=0 RLame=0 ROpts=0 SSysQ=0
SAns=40 SFwdQ=0 SDupQ=0 SErr=0 RQ=37 RIQ=0 RFwdQ=0 RDupQ=0 RTCP=0 SFwdR=0
SFail=30 SFErr=0 SNaAns=0 SNXD=0 RUQ=0 RURQ=0 RUXFR=0 RUUpd=1
2013 Oct 18
1
nsd-4.0.0b5(and rc2) and changing zone from master to slave ?
Hi,
I'm doing some quick tests with nsd-4.0.0b5 and (rc2). And found
something strange when changing (nsd-control reconfig) one
zone from:
zone:
name: 10.in-addr.arpa
zonefile: /zones/empty.zone
to
zone:
name: 10.in-addr.arpa
request-xfr: 192.168.122.12 NOKEY
allow-notify: 192.168.122.12 NOKEY
zonefile: /zones/slave/10.rev
and doing nsd-control reconfig.
After
2024 Oct 16
1
SIGSEGV in rbtree_find_less_equal
Hi Chris,
I've properly started looking into this yesterday. NSD definitely
shouldn't crash, still working on that.
However, the provided zone is invalid too(?) I'm not the foremost
expert on NSEC3 (or even DNSSEC), but is seems an NSEC3 is missing for
bar.foo.com. Empty non-terminals should still have an NSEC3 RR.
(Of course, the delegation point should be at bar.foo.com. too and
2024 Jan 11
1
support for ALIAS records
While SVCB/HTTPS provides a better solution for the browsing use case, I see other use cases where ALIAS/ANAME would be ideal, notably in apex RRs.
So while fostering SVCB/HTTPS deployment is a good thing, I wouldn?t mind name server software implementing ALIAS. Including NSD, but I reckon it?s much more challenging to do due to NSD architecture than it was to implement it in PowerDNS.
But if
2023 Apr 24
1
nsd issue
Hi Jean Claude,
The message is printed when the bind operation failed. Why that happens
is hard to say, I'd need more information for that. As the message does
not say: address already in use (or similar), I'm guessing the address
is not configured?
Best regards,
Jeroen
On Fri, 2023-04-21 at 18:03 +0200, HAKIZIMANA Jean Claude via nsd-users
wrote:
> Dear nsd Users,
> kindly can
2025 Jan 04
1
Old-main quit during quit sync
Hi all,
I'm running NSD 4.9.1 on OpenBSD 7.6. I recently upgraded from OpenBSD
7.5, which I believe had NSD 4.8.0 in base, and did not see this
behavior prior.
When I try to reload a zone using nsd-control, I am seeing an error
message in my logfile: "error: reload: old-main quit during quit sync"
This error does not appear to happen every time I run reload, but it
does get
2005 Dec 05
1
ANNOUNCEMENT: NSD 2.3.2 released
NSD 2.3.2 is a bugfix release.
Please see the README document for configuration and installation
instructions.
You can download NSD from http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/nsd/
Note: we switched to SHA-1 for tarball digest.
2.3.2
=============
FEATURES:
- Bug #101: add support for the SPF record.
BUG FIXES:
- Bug #100: replaced non-portable use of timegm(3) with
portable
2024 Oct 08
1
SIGSEGV in rbtree_find_less_equal
Hi Jeroen,
Attached is the zone I used. Did you add the record for a.bar ?
Ex:
a.bar 300 IN NS ns.somewhere.net.
Chris
________________________________
From: Jeroen Koekkoek <jeroen at nlnetlabs.nl>
Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2024 5:33 AM
To: Chris LaVallee <clavallee at edg.io>; nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl>
Subject: Re:
2024 Oct 09
1
SIGSEGV in rbtree_find_less_equal
Hi Chris,
I can reproduce with your zone. Thanks!
Best,
Jeroen
On Tue, 2024-10-08 at 14:07 +0000, Chris LaVallee wrote:
>
> Hi Jeroen,
>
>
> Attached is the zone I used. Did you add the record for a.bar ?
>
>
> Ex:
>
>
> a.bar ? 300 ? ? IN ?NS ? ? ?ns.somewhere.net.
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
2024 Oct 02
2
SIGSEGV in rbtree_find_less_equal
Hi,
I found a reproducible seg fault with a DNSSEC signed zone and overlapping config. I'm running NSD 4.10.1. Here's how to reproduce.
2 zones in nsd.conf:
zone:
name: "foo.com."
zonefile: "/zones/foo.com.zone.signed"
zone:
name: "bar.foo.com."
zonefile: "/zones/bar.foo.com.zone"
Zone files:
2024 Oct 08
1
SIGSEGV in rbtree_find_less_equal
Hi Chris,
I'm having trouble trying to reproduce the issue locally.
Like you I configure two zones.
zone:
name: example.com.
zonefile: example.com.zone.signed
zone:
name: bar.example.com.
zonefile: bar.example.com.zone
The file bar.example.com.zone does not exist. After touching and
reloading the signed zone, no segfault occurs. I've tried with and
without the
2024 Dec 28
2
NSD stops forking with newer zone data
hi,
On 2024-12-27 22:32, Fredrik Pettai via nsd-users wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It seems our NSD secondary has triggered some sort of intermittent bug
> After several weeks/months of running nsd stops forking with the new
> zone data.
>
> A manual nsd-control transfer or even nsd-control force_transfer won?t
> work, only restart of nsd solves the problem.
> The only
2024 May 17
1
query: bad tsig signature for key
hi,
At least with a recent version if it is a time sync issue nsd will do a specific log msg that.
Laura,
can you send over the actual configuration?
(maybe replacing the key with a placeholder or rotating the keys afterwards)
It sounds strange if nsd checks tsig on the notify, but allow xfr without it.
Regards,
Tam?s
May 16, 2024 16:14:59 Anand Buddhdev via nsd-users <nsd-users at