similar to: network bridge hairpin parameter support

This patch adds a 'hairpin' (also called 'reflective relay') mode port configuration to the Linux Ethernet bridge kernel module. A bridge supporting hairpin forwarding mode can send frames back out through the port the frame was received on. Hairpin mode is required to support basic VEPA (Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator) capabilities. You can find additional information on VEPA

This patch adds a 'hairpin' (also called 'reflective relay') mode port configuration to the Linux Ethernet bridge kernel module. A bridge supporting hairpin forwarding mode can send frames back out through the port the frame was received on. Hairpin mode is required to support basic VEPA (Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator) capabilities. You can find additional information on VEPA

This patch adds a 'hairpin' (also called 'reflective relay') mode port configuration to the Linux Ethernet bridge kernel module. A bridge supporting hairpin forwarding mode can send frames back out through the port the frame was received on. Hairpin mode is required to support basic VEPA (Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator) capabilities. You can find additional information on VEPA

This patch adds a 'hairpin' (also called 'reflective relay') mode port configuration to the Linux Ethernet bridge utilities. A bridge supporting hairpin forwarding mode can send frames back out through the port the frame was received on. Hairpin mode is required to support basic VEPA (Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator) capabilities. You can find additional information on VEPA

This patch adds a 'hairpin' (also called 'reflective relay') mode port configuration to the Linux Ethernet bridge utilities. A bridge supporting hairpin forwarding mode can send frames back out through the port the frame was received on. Hairpin mode is required to support basic VEPA (Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator) capabilities. You can find additional information on VEPA

This patch adds a 'hairpin' (also called 'reflective relay') mode port configuration to the Linux Ethernet bridge utilities. A bridge supporting hairpin forwarding mode can send frames back out through the port the frame was received on. Hairpin mode is required to support basic VEPA (Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator) capabilities. You can find additional information on VEPA

Hello List Asterisk 13.14.1 in use with pjsip stack. On the remote side is a SBC which performs some 'nat' detection. I suppose this means the SBC listens from where it is getting RTP data and then replies to that ip. As long as the asterisk is initiating the call this is fine, the asterisk start sending RTP to the media IP of the SBC and the SBC is sending media back. Now I want to do

Paul, I also think that bridge may not be the right place for VEPA, but rather a simpler sw/hw mux Although the VEPA support may reside in multiple places (I.e. also in the bridge) As Arnd pointed out Or already added an extension to qemu that allow direct guest virtual NIC mapping to an interface device (vs using tap), this was done specifically to address VEPA, and result in much faster

Paul, I also think that bridge may not be the right place for VEPA, but rather a simpler sw/hw mux Although the VEPA support may reside in multiple places (I.e. also in the bridge) As Arnd pointed out Or already added an extension to qemu that allow direct guest virtual NIC mapping to an interface device (vs using tap), this was done specifically to address VEPA, and result in much faster

Paul, I also think that bridge may not be the right place for VEPA, but rather a simpler sw/hw mux Although the VEPA support may reside in multiple places (I.e. also in the bridge) As Arnd pointed out Or already added an extension to qemu that allow direct guest virtual NIC mapping to an interface device (vs using tap), this was done specifically to address VEPA, and result in much faster

Asterisk 1.2.7 RedHat 9.0 I frequently have the need to redirect calls that come in on a DiD provisioned by my ITSP, back to the ITSP so that they can terminate the call on the PSTN. For example when an external call comes in, I often have to send it to a cell phone. I believe that this is referred to as "hairpinning" the call. I do this by answering the incoming call and then I use

This patch adds basic Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) capabilities to the Linux kernel Ethernet bridging code. A Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) is a capability within a physical end station that collaborates with an adjacent, external bridge to provide distributed bridging support between multiple virtual end stations and external networks. The VEPA collaborates by forwarding all

This patch adds basic Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) capabilities to the Linux kernel Ethernet bridging code. A Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) is a capability within a physical end station that collaborates with an adjacent, external bridge to provide distributed bridging support between multiple virtual end stations and external networks. The VEPA collaborates by forwarding all

This patch adds basic Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) capabilities to the Linux kernel Ethernet bridging code. A Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) is a capability within a physical end station that collaborates with an adjacent, external bridge to provide distributed bridging support between multiple virtual end stations and external networks. The VEPA collaborates by forwarding all

Hi, I have a problem with virtual plugin and geting mails form shared namespace. dovecot-virtual: ---- Shared/* Public/* * unseen ---- dovecot.conf: ---- namespace { inbox = yes location = prefix = separator = / type = private } namespace { list = children location =

Hello: Has anyone on this list had to configure hairpinning on a Cisco gateway running IOS 12.2 or 12.3 and using a PRI for connectivity to the PSTN? If so could you tell me how it is done? I'm told this is the source of my call transfer problems and yet I cannot find clear instructions for how the configuration is done. Thanks,Steve -- ISC Network Engineering The University of

This is based on an earlier patch from Eric Biederman adding forwarding between macvlans. I extended his approach to allow the administrator to choose the mode for each macvlan, and to implement a functional VEPA between macvlan. Still missing from this is support for communication between the lower device that the macvlans are based on. This would be extremely useful but as others have found out

This is based on an earlier patch from Eric Biederman adding forwarding between macvlans. I extended his approach to allow the administrator to choose the mode for each macvlan, and to implement a functional VEPA between macvlan. Still missing from this is support for communication between the lower device that the macvlans are based on. This would be extremely useful but as others have found out

This is based on an earlier patch from Eric Biederman adding forwarding between macvlans. I extended his approach to allow the administrator to choose the mode for each macvlan, and to implement a functional VEPA between macvlan. Still missing from this is support for communication between the lower device that the macvlans are based on. This would be extremely useful but as others have found out

Thanks, A "-q" (or an envvar to same effect) is another way to skin the cat, as discussed in that ticket and now followed-up by https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/1789 It still leaves open the question of whether default runs of NUT programs - especially as services or shutdown hooks - should be that quiet (whether because C code is changed unconditionally, or