similar to: upgrade procedure

Hello Everyone We are upgrading to Samba4 from Samba 3.x, we got a fully functional domain over the last 4 years and we are trying to do our migration as smooth as possible. I have migrated, users, machines and everything to the new samba4 domain (not in production yet), however when i log and old machine from the samba 3.x domain to the samba 4 domains, the local policy still applies, i suppose

Hello Last week we changed our ip range, every computer was shutdown and everything is working, but we are still getting the old ip address on the dns, my version is samba 4.0.3 and i am using internal dns This is the actual smb.conf [global] workgroup = MYCOMPANY realm = MYCOMPANY.COM.CO netbios name = DOMINIO server role = active directory domain controller idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes

Hello I have a samba 4.0.3 pdc and a samba 3.5.10 as a fileserver and i am having an issue that i like to share with you. I have a share son the samba 3 setup like this [Comercial] browsable = Yes comment = Comercial path = /shares2/Comercial valid users = @Ingenieria, @Mercadeo, @Comercial, @SIIF, @Costos, administrador, backup write list = @Comercial,

Hi Andrew, Thanks to your input, I've been able to run the samba_upgradeprovision script. But the full oprion fails with : Creating a reference provision WARNING: no network interfaces found No IPv4 address will be assigned WARNING: no network interfaces found No IPv6 address will be assigned Update base samdb by searching difference with reference one Starting update of samdb There are 125

I made a try translating the group names one by one in the setup/provision_users.ldif file. The first groups went OK but when I translate "Incoming Forest Trust Builders" by "Générateurs d'approbations de forêt entrante", I get this error from the script : Traceback (most recent call last): File "source4/scripting/bin/samba_upgradeprovision", line 1714, in

On Sun, 08 Apr 2018 13:34:52 +0200 Kris via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > W dniu 2018-04-08 12:49, Rowland Penny via samba napisał(a): > > On Sun, 08 Apr 2018 12:31:26 +0200 > > Kris via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> I should try this command sooner. Now I have made full backup and > >> something is missing: >

On Sun, 08 Apr 2018 12:31:26 +0200 Kris via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I should try this command sooner. Now I have made full backup and > something is missing: > > [root at dc ~]# cd /opt/samba-4.7.6/bin > [root at dc bin]# ./samba_upgradeprovision --realm=DOMAIN.NET.PL -U > Administrator > Traceback (most recent call last): > File

>From the latest samba4 git HEAD, I was trying to run samba_upgradeprovision, but didn't see it in /sbin/ (Actually, I saw an older version that wasn't working due to new python imports). I've tried completely reinstalling (using git clean -x -f -d; make clean), though I don't see /sbin/samba_upgradeprovision Is this tool no longer installed? (Should I file a bug against the

Hi Andrew, Thanks for your answer. I gave a try with source4/scripting/bin/samba_upgradeprovision --full. Of course I did it on a virtual machine clone of our dc without network interface. The script fails with : ../lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_index.c:1252: unique index violation on objectSid in CN=Account Operators,CN=Builtin,DC=removed,DC=com, conficts with CN=Op?rateurs de

Hello In our company we have 5 remote office, i'm trying to setup a replicated domain across this sites, using vpn, is multiple DCs soported? can i use the RODC option or is not yet implemented? I try top setup the replication between this servers but i'm starting to get several WERR_BADFILE error and now i get a WERR_DS_DRA_INTERNAL_ERROR Appreciate any help

On Sat, 2013-02-16 Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Sat, 2013-02-16 at 12:55 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote: >> On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 12:52 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote: >> > On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 20:50 -0500, Thomas Simmons wrote: >> > > Thank you, Andrew. Just to be clear, you're saying I can upgrade to 4.0.3 >> > > (but do nothing after make install)? If

Originally I had a Win 2003 DC. I added a samba 4.0.0 DC to the domain, allow full replication to take place and then transferred all the roles to the samba 4.0.0 dc. Finally I removed the Windows DC from the domain. Everything has been working well. Today I upgraded from samba 4.0.0 to 4.0.3 and ran samba_upgradeprovision --full. Initially this was failing in update_present throwing an exception

On 01.05.2017 13:15, James Pearson wrote: > Walter.H at mathemainzel.info: >> I get regularily such a mail >> >> <mail> >> Anacron job 'cron.daily' on .... >> >> /etc/cron.daily/logrotate: >> >> error: error running non-shared postrotate script for >> /var/log/clamd.clamsmtp/clamsmtpd.log of >>

I'm running dovecot under runit: #!/bin/sh echo '/var/core/%p' > /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern ulimit -n 8096 ulimit -c unlimited exec /usr/local/sbin/dovecot -F (that way, together with incron, I can automatically generate the coredumps I'm posting all the time) If I apply a patch and recompile, what is the fastest way of restarting dovecot? Which part of the process

Ubuntu 14.04, ctdb 2.5.1 from the ubuntu package. samba 4.1.11 with cluster support from source. Error upon startup only. Restarting ctdb on that node clears the error. The other node with the same config is OK. Any ideas? Cheers, Steve smb.conf [global] workgroup = ALTEA realm = ALTEA.SITE security = ADS kerberos method = secrets and keytab netbios name = SMBCLUSTER disable netbios = Yes

ctdb 2.5.3 dual node file server with 4.1.9 serving AD domain Hi We have enabled the script at: /etc/cdb/events.d/50.samba but when we are the enabled node, it starts not only smbd but also nmbd. This doesn't make sense in an AD domain. I've tried disabling nmbd starting under openSUSE's systemd but ctdb overrides that, I've had a look at the script but can't decipher the bit

Hi, I am very new to this so please go easy on me... I am trying to deploy my app on dreamhost and I seem to be having problems getting it working. One of the troubleshooting items on the wiki states: Rails apps in production mode do not reflect changes made after they start running. So, if you found a bug, fixed it and nothing appeared to happen--this is probably because you

2017-09-08 13:07 GMT+02:00 Pavel Szalbot <pavel.szalbot at gmail.com>: > OK, so killall seems to be ok after several attempts i.e. iops do not stop > on VM. Reboot caused I/O errors after maybe 20 seconds since issuing the > command. I will check the servers console during reboot to see if the VM > errors appear just after the power cycle and will try to crash the VM after >

Oh, and if you don't have killall installed, you can use: ps -ef | grep yum to get the pid and then use: kill -TERM pid or easier even is: kill -TERM `pid of yum` Chris On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Chris Stone <axisml at gmail.com> wrote: > try CTRL-Z to put that running process in your shell to sleep, then: > > bg 1 > > to put the process in the background.

The 2.04b rpm for rh60 ships with and installs a config file for logrotate (the samba.log file in the packaging/RedHat section). ===== /var/log/samba/log.nmb { postrotate /usr/bin/killall -HUP nmbd endrotate } /var/log/samba/log.smb { postrotate /usr/bin/killall -HUP smbd endrotate } ===== 1) I think that the use of "endrotate" is wrong. There is no