similar to: Server 2012 Encrypted Shares

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "Server 2012 Encrypted Shares"

2013 Mar 18
1
Server 2012 Encrypted Shares and SMB 3.0
Hello Samba folks, Server 2012 has an option to create encrypted shares which enable in-transit data encryption between Windows 8 clients using SMB 3.0. ( http://blogs.technet.com/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/communityserver-blogs-components-weblogfiles/00-00-00-47-85-metablogapi/2313.clip_5F00_image00111_5F00_757A262D.jpg ) I ran across a presentation from Michael Adam where he mentioned
2015 Jul 01
2
strange: 20 characters max in samAccountName
Thank you both precisions : ) My users have no "@" in their names (samAccountName nor userPrincipalName nor anything) except in mail attribute). >From https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms679635%28v=vs.85%29.aspx which I read before initial post I understand AD can have this limitation of 20 chars if and only if you decide to support (so) old clients (that we should stop
2015 Jul 01
0
strange: 20 characters max in samAccountName
On 01/07/15 17:44, mathias dufresne wrote: > Thank you both precisions : ) > > My users have no "@" in their names (samAccountName nor userPrincipalName > nor anything) except in mail attribute). What have you got in userPrincipalName ? > > From https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms679635%28v=vs.85%29.aspx > which I read before initial post I understand AD
2015 Jul 02
1
strange: 20 characters max in samAccountName
Thank you again Rowland for precision : ) In userPrincipalName there is a "@". It is forged with cn at ad.domain.tld and cn is forged with firstname.sn, as samAccountName, which often is longer than 20 chars. I'll change that... Thank you again all, have a nice day! mathias 2015-07-01 18:56 GMT+02:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>: > On 01/07/15 17:44,
2002 Jun 05
1
oplock break failures
After upgrading from 2.0.10a to 2.2.4, I'm seeing many new messages being logged. What does this mean? Jun 5 09:42:50 files2 smbd[27585]: [2002/06/05 09:42:50, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(788) Jun 5 09:42:50 files2 smbd[27585]: oplock_break: no break received from client within 30 seconds. Jun 5 09:42:50 files2 smbd[27585]: oplock_break failed for file
2009 Sep 23
6
[Bug 1653] New: Can not rename (move) files across bind mounts
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1653 Summary: Can not rename (move) files across bind mounts Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.2p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sftp-server AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
2009 Sep 21
2
Cannot rename across bind mounts
Hello, I am having problems with renaming a file if the source or destination path is located on a bind mount. For instance if in the root directory, I have the directories "Files1" and "Files2" where one or both of the directories are created as the result of a bind mount, then when trying to do rename /Files1/a /Files2/b it produces an error saying it "Couldn't
2006 Jan 26
0
Upgrading Samba
I am in the process of planning for a samba upgrade. The current version of Samba (2.2.8a) runs on a Sunfire 280R with Solaris 8. The intended new platform is a sunfire V240 with Solaris 9 as the OS. The new version of Samba will be Samba-3.0.10. Please note that the Samba server will be a member of a domain. I've read Samba-3 by Example, Chapter 8 which describes to the process of updating
2017 Oct 11
0
Using GPO to mount shares on Linux
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 11:00:59 +0200 Michael Wandel <m.wandel at t-online.de> wrote: > On 11.10.2017 10:37, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:13:35 +0200 > > "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> If you mean, Linux <=> Linux , use automounting, of dedicated > >> mounts.
2017 Oct 11
0
Using GPO to mount shares on Linux
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:03:38 +0200 Michael Wandel <m.wandel at t-online.de> wrote: > On 11.10.2017 11:38, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 11:00:59 +0200 > > Michael Wandel <m.wandel at t-online.de> wrote: > > > >> On 11.10.2017 10:37, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > >>> On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:13:35 +0200 >
2013 May 03
0
Slow copy from windows
Samba 3.6.3-23.2.0-41-generic-paeUbuntu 12.04Realtek 8111B Whenever I try to copy a file to a samba share from windows 7 or xp machine the copy is too slowaround 800-1000 KBps8FTP or SCP works 10 times faster also when copying from the share to my PC it also goes fast the problem occurs only when copying files to the samba share tried changing the NIC and the problem persist here is my smb.conf
2017 Oct 11
0
Using GPO to mount shares on Linux
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 11:51:02 +0200 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > > Rowland Penny via samba > > Verzonden: woensdag 11 oktober 2017 11:39 > > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba]
2017 Oct 11
2
Using GPO to mount shares on Linux
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland Penny via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 11 oktober 2017 11:39 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Using GPO to mount shares on Linux > > On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 11:00:59 +0200 > Michael Wandel <m.wandel at t-online.de> wrote: > > >
2015 Jul 01
3
strange: 20 characters max in samAccountName
Hi all, Sernet Samba 4.2.2 as Active Directory on Debian 7.8. No other DC. I can't log in with on Windows systems (Windows 7) when samAccountName are longer than 20 characters. This seems to be a LAN MAN or NT4 limitation which should not happen on AD domain. Any idea what could leads my to that limitation? I can log in using administrator account or any other having a short (enough)
2008 Apr 07
6
64-bit windows capability
What is the prognosis for being able to install a 64-bit windows guest (of any variety) on an opensolaris host. Don Nichols
2017 Oct 11
5
Using GPO to mount shares on Linux
Hello, I'm using a Samba 4 as domain server and I've a lot of Windows computers that mounts shared drives on another server through GPO applied by user groups. Is there any way to do something similar on a Linux box, or I've to use a local script? Thanks! -- _________________________________________ Daniel Carrasco Marín Ingeniería para la Innovación i2TIC, S.L.
2003 Dec 05
1
USRMGR.EXE
Hello Is here anybody who is able to manage his NT4.0 domain on hid Samba 3 PDC with User Manager for Domains? Can you please tell me what things must be checked to be sure USRMGR.EXE administration (User Manager for Domains aka Domain User Manager) works? I am unable to make it working and tried already these Samba versions: 3.0.0 3.0.0rc1 3.0.0rc2 3.0.0rc3 3.0.1pre3 3.0.1rc1 2003-12-04 head
2004 Mar 07
1
Unable to login using 3.0.2a-SuSE as PDC and WinXP
Hello, I've got a strange problem here: I installed Samba 3.0.2a using the official rpms on a SuSE 9.0 machine. I configured samba in the smb.conf as a PDC and created user and machine accounts on the system as well as in the smbpasswd. Afterwards I was able to join the domain with my Windows XP client. After a reboot I am unable to log on to the Domain on my WinXP client. There's just the
2004 Aug 06
1
Compile errors
Hi, while trying to compile icecast, I got a lot of errors while trying to compile avl.c, I've attached a file with the compile errors. Any ideas as to what might be wrong? My distro is Redhat 7.2 fully up2date. <p>Cheers! -------------- next part -------------- In file included from ../thread/thread.h:25, from avl.c:35: /usr/include/pthread.h:163: parse error before
2010 Jul 10
1
deadlock possiblity introduced by "drm/nouveau: use drm_mm in preference to custom code doing the same thing"
Hi Patch "drm/nouveau: use drm_mm in preference to custom code doing the same thing" in nouveau tree introduced new deadlock possibility, for which lockdep complains loudly: [ 1541.070202] [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: Allocating FIFO number 3 [ 1541.084772] [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: nouveau_channel_alloc: initialised FIFO 3 [ 2417.733440] [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: