similar to: Samba4

Funny you should post this now. I was just cleaning up some DNS records and the following happend. I had to PTR records with an empty timestamp. I deleted them and wanted to recreate them. My reverse Zones are 0.168.192.in-addr.arpa and 2.168.192.in-addr.arpa both of the records I delted were in the "0" zone. The first i recreated with: samba-tool dns add dc1

Hi, We have outdated SOA information in our samba DNS. We used to have a DC1, and it is no more, however it's listed in our SOA records on both remaining DC's. I think this is not correct. I am under the impression that in order to get full failover support, all DC's need to have listed themselves as SOA. This is also what google tells me:

Guys, what i noticed. Look at this. Refused- 1/3/0 (Class 254) ( /24 ) Paully used /16 update 1/3/1 (Class 254) CNAME V-RDS02.mydomain.com CNAME ? And, if he uses in his example samba-tool dns add dc3 mydomain.com V-RDS02 A 130.130.0.252 A record was used. Is resolv.conf checked and it is sure in pointing to the correct DNS of the AD first? addresses: -

Is there a way to list all the current entries with samba-tool? Use it as a way to check what is happening? On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 10:58:40 -0500 > Robert Wooden <bob at donelsontrophy.com> wrote: > > > Due to an unrelated incident I was forced to restart the DC. Further > >

Hi guys. I have mail loop problem. I have master server (CentOS 5.x) for domain in question (lets call it *domainX.com* ). I used virtualmin to set it up for that and several other domains. It is Bind SOA for the domain and Postfix server. I will call this server *soa.domainX.com* Now, I have added internal CentOS 6.x server to the company owner of the domain. I have given it hostname

the patrikx3.com is my domain my AD DC domain is p3x-dc.patrikx3.com, you can see: root at server:~# cat /etc/bind/zones/enp1s0f3/patrikx3.com ; Replaces on ennp1s0f2 to ennp1s0f3 ; 192.168.81. 192.168.78. ; 2001:470:1f1b:5b5:21b:21ff:fea6:ce92 2001:470:1f1b:5b3:21b:21ff:fea6:ce93 ; format is done with xed Linux Mint, not using tab, only space $TTL 3600 @

Subject: Re-configuring BIND DNS Servers for CentOS Web Panel Web Hosting Control Panel on Amazon AWS Cloud Author: Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming, Singapore Date: 27 Feb 2020 Thursday Rationale for Re-configuration of BIND DNS Servers for CentOS Web Panel ======================================================================= I have originally followed the approach for cPanel where there

Hi, 'm trying to setup a Win 2k8 r2 as member server of my domain as Andrew did on his video, but I've come across this error: Aug 9 22:47:10 voip named[17100]: client 192.168.254.160#62102: updating zone 'samba.dghvoip.com/IN': update unsuccessful: samba.dghvoip.com: 'name not in use' prerequisite not satisfied (YXDOMAIN) I followed SambaWiki howto word by word, and my

Ole, DC IPs (A records) are not meant to be changed (not changed _often_ at least), CNAME are. CNAME are aliases. When a AD site is created nothing else is done, you added a 2016-06-24 3:48 GMT+02:00 Traupe, Ole <ole.traupe at tu-berlin.de>: > Thanks again for your help, James! > > I did test-wise and I didn't see any changes in DNS. But I hadn't changed > the IP,

On 02/03/2020 13:16, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > Samba runs samba_dnsupgrade on a regular basis, using dns_update_list as a template. Amongst the list of dns entries is this: > > AAAA ${HOSTNAME}?????????????????????????????????????????? $IP > Hi Rowland, Thanks for replying so quickly. OK, is there a way to pause this process for the purposes of debugging? Can I

(please reply to the list) If the record does not exist, then you have an other problem. Because samba does support this : cat /var/lib/samba/private/named.conf.update /* this file is auto-generated - do not edit */ update-policy { grant INTERNAL.DOMAIN.TLD ms-self * A AAAA; grant Administrator at INTERNAL.DOMAIN.TLD wildcard * A AAAA SRV CNAME; grant

Hi! We are facing problems with Windows 10 and dynamic DNS. The problem is that samba_dlz prevents AAAA deletion. Can we permit AAAA somehow or fix this? Disabling IPv6 and removing IPv6 driver from interface made no difference whatsoever. This works on Windows 7 just fine. Samba version: 4.1.6-Ubuntu We see the following with wireshark: Domain Name System (query) Transaction ID: 0x8aa4

hi again. after some tests, (on my operational domain and on a new testdomain) i detected this behavior: on samba 4.11.6 sometimes the new DNS-records finisches on a wrong dns zone. the problem occurs, if more then 5 records are created with the same name in more then one domain zone for example: testa1.jupiter.mydom.org testa2.jupiter.mydom.org testa3.jupiter.mydom.org

Ok, I made a backup following the Samba wiki and then did this. Had to wait a bit between updating the SOA's because I got a strange error message saying that a time value for the non-update of some resource cleanup wasn't set. But a few minutes later I could update the second SOA as well, and now the Samba log is clean. Ole Am 28.10.2015 um 16:42 schrieb Ole Traupe: > Hi, >

On 07.07.2020 22:14, Mani Wieser via samba wrote: > > On 07.07.2020 21:14, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 07/07/2020 20:00, James B. Byrne via samba wrote: >>> I have this on the DC smb4-1.brockley.harte-lyne.ca: >>> >>> samba-tool dns query localhost brockley.harte-lyne.ca >>> brockley.harte-lyne.ca >>> ALL -U administrator

Hi, We have an issue where an existing Win 10 client is already part of the domain, however it's DNS entry isn't updated, Is this bug related? https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11520 please see details below Ubuntu: 16.04.01 LTS Samba: Version 4.3.9-Ubuntu Samba Internal DNS 'allow dns updates = nonsecure' is not specified >ipconfig /registerdns Samba-Log: sudo

Hai Christian, > Can someone reproduce this? No, tried, but sorry, works fine for me on my 4.11.6 server. And what is you try it like this. samba-tool dns add dc1.zone1.domain.de 0.168.192.in-addr.arpa 157 PTR zone1.domain.de -U Administrator samba-tool dns add dc1.zone1.domain.de 1.168.192.in-addr.arpa 157 PTR zone2.domain.de -U Administrator I tested on my production where i have 6

Hi mathias, thanks for the heads-up! However, my AD Sites and Services is clear, too. I followed the suggestion here https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Demote_a_Samba_AD_DC to use this http://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/scriptcenter/d31f091f-2642-4ede-9f97-0e1cc4d577f3#content script. Copy the contents of the "Visual Basic" box to a text file and rename it to

Back from another test: rather than build new DCs, join them and use one of them to seize FSMO roles, I just seize FSMO with one of my current DCs. Once more the SOA was not updated, which seems to mean there is a real issue about that as seizing these roles has chances to precede removal of old FSMO owner. To update SOA record using samba-tool: 1) If not created, create a NS record for the DC

Hi, Why modifying a working conf when you can build your DC on others systems (VM)? That could be really nice to learn but you add a lot of complexity in your process, I think. Why not using DLZ to access your AD zones? I expect Bind to be able to mix its behaviour: flat file for some zone, DLZ for others... Now regarding: update-policy { grant AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD ms-self *