similar to: passing username and password to external script

I've configured samba4 as PDC according to the official HOWTO. Nearly everything went well, except that executing command samba_dnsupdate results with: ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure Failed nsupdate: 2 Failed update of 21 entries The whole output is available at: http://pastebin.com/xrG2KZwZ It's wired, because domain seems working properly: I can login as domain admin,

Hi, When I try to get some records by ldbsearch i get weird messages before I get what I search, that started to show some time ago. I did not have it before, anyone had that messages? Do I should worry? ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb sAMAccountName=test GENSEC backend 'gssapi_spnego' registered GENSEC backend 'gssapi_krb5' registered GENSEC backend

Hello, I do vulnerability test on my infrastructure, and I get report about weak ciphers on samba services, is it possible to set stronger ciphers for samba? On old samba3 that was possible to set "ssl ciphers" in smb.conf, but now I don't see any documentation how to change it. Is it possible, if so, how? -- Arkadiusz Karpi?ski Efinity Sp. z o.o. 02-672 Warszawa, ul.

On 01.10.2019 14:06, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 01/10/2019 12:51, Arkadiusz Karpi?ski wrote: >> >> On 30.09.2019 20:03, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 30/09/2019 18:06, akarpinski wrote: >>>> Samba version is 4.10.7 >>>> >>>> smb.conf: >>>> >>>> # Global parameters >>>> [global]

+pcc for thoughts On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Bakhvalov, Denis <denis.bakhvalov at intel.com > wrote: > Hello Teresa, > > > > > Without -flto, a.o ends up with a reference to __exp_finite, > > That’s correct. > > > > > which also would not be satifisfied out of libexp.a. > > That’s not correct. Even if libexp.a would have __exp_finite, it

Hello All I try to install net Framework 2.0 but without success. During intallation process Registering file System.EnterpriseServices.dll I:"C:\windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\RegSvcs.exe" /bootstrapi 2: instalation crash > ------------------------------------------------------ > Instaling .net 2.0 runtime. Can take several minutes. See

A couple questions/notes so I can understand better: Without -flto, a.o ends up with a reference to __exp_finite, which also would not be satifisfied out of libexp.a. Do you also have an implementation of __exp_finite in your libexp.a? Can you build with -fno-builtin, or -fno-builtin-exp etc? That results in a reference to __exp_finite in the .o bitcode (which of course has the same issue I

Hi, I have found get_disconnect_reason() to be called with NULL ctx->litinput at times, making dovecot crash when accessing v_offset: src/imap/cmd-append.c: 83 switch (i_stream_read(client->input)) { 84 case -1: 85 /* disconnected */ 86 reason = get_disconnect_reason(ctx, ctx->litinput->v_offset); 87

Hi, imap_msgpart_crlf_seek() returns an error stream in case of problems in message_skip_virtual(). The original input stream is not being unreferenced, preventing destroy callbacks from being executed. Shouldn't we have an i_stream_unref(&input) here: src/lib-imap-storage/imap-msgpart.c: 398 if (message_skip_virtual(input, virtual_skip, &cr_skipped) < 0) { 399

Hi, dovecot's message parser enters an endless loop when fed with certain multipart messages with stray CR characters. parse_next_body_to_boundary() assumes the '\r' might be the beginning of a boundary line, reducing the block size by one: src/lib-mail/message-parser.c: 404 /* no linefeeds in this block. we can just skip it. */ 405 ret = 0; 406

> I'm trying to understand how the non-LTO case is supposed to work non-LTO case works because when linker starts it’s job all the llvm intrinsics are already lowered. > Right, which is why I am suggesting that it might be appropriate to build with -fno-builtin (or -fno-builtin-exp) here – > this solves the LTO issue as there will no longer be an llvm intrinsic in the bitcode Yes, I

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1461 Summary: session.c: don't chdir() after chroot() if chroot_path==pw->pw_dir Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.0p1

Hello Teresa, > Without -flto, a.o ends up with a reference to __exp_finite, That’s correct. > which also would not be satifisfied out of libexp.a. That’s not correct. Even if libexp.a would have __exp_finite, it wouldn’t be resolved from libexp.a, because of the behavior described in my first message. > Do you also have an implementation of __exp_finite in your libexp.a? No, I don’t

Hi All I've a weird problem regarding ACLs and samba (on Linux as PDC and Windows as clients) Here are the details: *** spaceman@censmb ~ $ id uid=2000(spaceman) gid=512(Domain Admins) groups=10(wheel),512(Domain Admins),513(Domain Users) censmb apps # ls -l test.txt -r--rwxr--+ 1 ujakubia users 0 Jun 18 13:14 test.txt censmb apps # getfacl test.txt # file: test.txt # owner: ujakubia #

Dear community, Recently I discovered that llvm gold linker plugin (LLVMgold.so) doesn't add llvm instrinsics symbols to the linker symbol table. I do not claim that something is necessary wrong, just want to share my observations with the community. Brief summary If I create a static library with a custom version of 'exp()' math function and link it as follows: $

Hi, I'm from Intel compiler department. I am proposing the integration of a backend targeting Nios II processor architecture. Nios II is a 32-bit general-purpose RISC processor core designed specifically for the Altera family of FPGAs. All information at about Nios II can be found at Altera website https://www.altera.com/products/processors/support.html, including the current ISA

On 2019-12-16 19:45, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > The obvious candidate based on a quick scan is > 0acf5676dc0ffe0683543a20d5ecbd112af5b8ee -- it merges a fix that > messes with PCI stuff, and there lie dragons. You could try building > that commit, and if things still work, then I have no idea (and you've Nice shot Ilia! I managed to build kernel from suspected bd112af5b8ee and it fails

On 2019-12-16 18:08, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > Hi Marcin, > > You should do a git bisect rather than guessing about commits. I > suspect that searching for "kernel git bisect fedora" should prove > instructive if you're not sure how to do this. Thanks for your suggestion. I realize that I can do it at the Git level and it is the ultimate way to go. However, building the

Let's add Mika and Rafael, as they were responsible for that commit. Mika/Rafael - any ideas? The commit in question is 0617bdede5114a0002298b12cd0ca2b0cfd0395d Marcin -- would be nice if you could confirm that taking a recent kernel + "git revert 0617bdede5114a0002298b12cd0ca2b0cfd0395d" works well for you. On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 3:27 PM Marcin Zaj?czkowski <mszpak at

The obvious candidate based on a quick scan is 0acf5676dc0ffe0683543a20d5ecbd112af5b8ee -- it merges a fix that messes with PCI stuff, and there lie dragons. You could try building that commit, and if things still work, then I have no idea (and you've narrowed the range). Also I'd recommend ensuring that the good kernel is really good and the bad kernel is really bad -- boot them a few