similar to: Dovecot SASL & Postfix

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Dovecot SASL & Postfix"

2007 Jan 15
1
FreeBSD, Postfix, Cyrus SASL, Dovecot IMAP, SquirrelMail, Active Directory
Here's an update to my configuration. I'm able to use Cyrus SASL to enable SMTP AUTH in PostFix, validate user's mail addresses in Active Directory, and store mail in maildir on FreeBSD. I am currently able to authenticate AD users with Dovecot and LDAP, but I'm getting the following error in the log: Error: IMAP(user at domain): Ambiguous mail location setting, don't know
2015 Mar 27
1
postfix sasl -> haproxy -> dovecot auth
Gedalya skrev den 2015-03-27 14:48: >> is it possible to configure configure haproxy to work with postfix >> sasl and dovecot auth like this: >> clients -> 25:postfix -> 20025:haproxy -> 20025:auth-backend-1, >> 20025:auth-backend-2 > Why don't you set up a dovecot locally (with only auth service) on > each postfix box? cyrus-sasl is still needed, and
2015 Mar 27
4
postfix sasl -> haproxy -> dovecot auth
I will install cyrus-sasl and see how it goes. Anyway, it would be nice to have same features (authentication agains imap) in dovecot. On 27 Mar 2015, at 16:27, Benny Pedersen <me at junc.eu> wrote: > Edgaras Luko?evi?ius skrev den 2015-03-27 14:58: > >> I don?t want to allow public network facing servers to be able to >> reach passwords database. And I want to
2015 Mar 27
4
postfix sasl -> haproxy -> dovecot auth
Can?t dovecot authenticate against imap? What I need is to make smtp authentication balanced and keep everything in backend (private network) On 27 Mar 2015, at 13:29, Benny Pedersen <me at junc.eu> wrote: > Edgaras Luko?evi?ius skrev den 2015-03-27 12:21: > >> is it possible to configure configure haproxy to work with postfix >> sasl and dovecot auth like this:
2015 Mar 27
5
postfix sasl -> haproxy -> dovecot auth
Hello, is it possible to configure configure haproxy to work with postfix sasl and dovecot auth like this: clients -> 25:postfix -> 20025:haproxy -> 20025:auth-backend-1, 20025:auth-backend-2 The configuration I have now gives me this error randomly: 535 5.7.8 Error: authentication failed: Connection lost to authentication server This is probably because haproxy change servers while
2015 Mar 27
2
postfix sasl -> haproxy -> dovecot auth
I don?t want to allow public network facing servers to be able to reach passwords database. And I want to segregate roles of the servers. If I will setup dovecot locally I will still have to provide it access to database (eg. /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf.ext). On 27 Mar 2015, at 15:49, Benny Pedersen <me at junc.eu> wrote: > Edgaras Luko?evi?ius skrev den 2015-03-27 14:34: >>
2004 Sep 19
2
Postfix-TLS/SASL-rimap
Will Dovecot support the Cyrus SASL library rimap mechanism? If so, is there anything I need to enable/verify for it to work? And is there another tool to verify proper behaviour besides trying to log in with a client? Daniel
2019 Nov 13
2
SASL AUTH with postfix
Hi, I just moved from Cyrus SASL to Dovecot SASL, with postfix. Works great, and no issue with non-ascii chars, has i had with Cyrus. With Cyrus i was getting the username/passwd via SQL, with this: sql_select: select password from smtp_auth_users where username='%u@%r' and status='true' worked ok for users with email addresses, and i had some special users that were just a
2015 Mar 27
1
postfix sasl -> haproxy -> dovecot auth
Are you a cyrus developer ir what? :D 2015 kov. 27 17:10 "Benny Pedersen" <me at junc.eu> ra??: > Edgaras Luko?evi?ius skrev den 2015-03-27 16:00: > >> I will install cyrus-sasl and see how it goes. >> > > +1 > > Anyway, it would be nice to have same features (authentication agains >> imap) in dovecot. >> > > read more docs in
2013 Jul 01
3
nova-compute, libvirt and authentication
Hello I have a question about live migration when libvirt requires sasl authentication. I have managed to configure remote access for user nova with sasl enabled (credentials stored in auth.conf - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/12706/). It looks like live migration do not use these credentials at all. What is more it thinks that sasl is not not configured: 2013-07-01 09:49:09.317+0000: 17997:
2019 Dec 10
2
Dovecot SASL
Howdy, I know i've asked this before, but i think i got really no answer. I'd like to have dovecot SASL, to check AUTH against an SQL table, instead of dovecot SASL use the AUTH MECH for imap/pop3. I want this, to have the same behavior as I have now, where i use postfix with cyrus SASL on a different table (with the same login details), and when i have an user that his accounts
2017 Sep 26
4
Securing postfix to dovecot (SASL) auth
Hi Is it possible to secure the Dovecot SASL auth provider for postfix? https://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixAndDovecotSASL I'm currently using the inet option to provide SASL auth to postfix for dovecot. Both installs are on different hosts hence the use of inet rather than unix socket. I'm looking for the best way to secure this channel (rather than just assuming the VLAN is secure
2019 Nov 13
2
SASL AUTH with postfix
Jorge Bastos via dovecot skrev den 2019-11-13 22:00: > How can i have the same with dovecot SASL? > Thanks in advanced, https://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixAndDovecotSASL Hi benny, Thanks, That's exactly what i have in postfix: smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot smtpd_sasl_path = private/auth smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes plus: smtpd_sasl_local_domain = fastmail but the user that i have
2004 May 30
1
Postfix SASL AUTH from Dovecot
Again today got annoyed at Cyrus SASL. Upgrading it to newer version had broken PAM support. Trying to login as "user at domain" resulted it only asking for "user" from PAM. Well, got it patched and working again, but I'd rather not go through it all the time.. So I finally did what I had been thinking about a year or so, change Postfix to use dovecot-auth directly. This
2019 Aug 14
2
SASL: encoded packet size too big
Hello! Dovecot uses it's own SASL implementation, doesn't it? Aug 14 23:45:23 example.com auth[10428]: GSSAPI client step 1 Aug 14 23:45:23 example.com auth[10428]: encoded packet size too big (813804546 > 65536) Aug 14 23:45:23 example.com dovecot[10085]: auth-worker(10428): Error: LDAP: Can't connect to server: ldap://ipa2.example.com Aug 14 23:45:23 example.com
2019 Aug 15
2
SASL: encoded packet size too big
I suspect the problem is that dovecot tries to report LDAP error over GSSAPI. So the best fix is to make sure your LDAP server does not return error. =) Aki On 15.8.2019 14.56, Eugene Bright wrote: > That's right. > GSS-API is not used anywhere else. > Do you like to inspect my full configuration? > I can dump connection session and send pcap file here. > > On August 15,
2007 Sep 04
1
CESA-2007:0878 Moderate CentOS 3 ia64 cyrus-sasl - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0878 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0878.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/cyrus-sasl-2.1.15-15.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/cyrus-sasl-devel-2.1.15-15.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/cyrus-sasl-gssapi-2.1.15-15.ia64.rpm
2006 Jul 04
2
cyrus-sasl mysql backend
Hello, Is anybody using the cyrus-sasl mysql backend on 4.3? I have problems with it, it keeps segfaulting whenever the process enters sasl code. Feizhou
2009 Mar 28
1
Common "sasl master" [Was: sendmail with dovecot sasl]
Hi, so sendmail can use only cyrus-sasl ? ok, thank you >Mario Pavlov wrote: >> I was wondering if I can make sendmail use dovecot's SASL >> implementation...maybe I should somehow compile it against dovecot's >> SASL ? My idea is to make sendmail and dovecot authenticate against >> one central user/password repository. Is this possible ? >>
2009 Nov 11
1
Postfix and Dovecot SASL
Hello all, I am struggeling to get my Dovecot SASL to work within postfix. I have used the configuration example listed on the main-site of dovecot and it basically isn't giving me any success at all. I am probably missing something easy, but after spending a few days testing and walking through everything I could think about I thought figured it was better to ask :) Hope someone can point me