similar to: Centos 5 Xen Problem

Dear Yagi-san, > I heard from the horse's mouth that the CentOS team is working on the > 100Hz centosplus kernel. I think your request triggered the action :-) > They want make people happy. That sounds nice! This TIPS, CONFIG_HZ=100, is one of FAQs. It will make most of us happy. Now we can get kernel-vm package on dev.centos.org. Is it a test release of the special kernel? I

Kashyap: I have not tried integrating your guest xml but I will look over it today when I get a chance. Thank you. Martin: Below is the output from /proc/cpuinfo. Let me know if there is anything else that would be helpful in debugging this. Thank you, Michael Giardino processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 60 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz stepping

Hi all, I am trying to configure a kvm guest using pci passthrough to pass it a wireless pci adapter (host is my personal laptop). But when I try to start it: error: Failed to start domain obsdfw error: unsupported configuration: host doesn't support passthrough of host PCI devices PCI passthrough is enabled: [ 0.000000] Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.10.0-327.28.3.el7.x86_64

Hi list, i currently have the following issue: I did a test upgrade to libvirt 1.1.4 and now i cannot create new snapshots which can be reverted. Following Situation: Virtualization: kvm Disktype: qcow2 qemu XML: <cpu mode='host-passthrough'> </cpu> Creating of snapshot: virsh snapshot-create-as <guest> <name> <description> --atomic Now i craete

On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:30:11AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote: > Hi Martin > > Thanks for your response. Here's the output of that grep: > > # grep ^flags /proc/cpuinfo | sort -u > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca > cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall > nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc

Hi All, First time mailing here, I hope someone can help. We?re running a OpenStack Newton environment on top of CentOS-7.3, LibVirt and Qemu-KVM-EV. We are encountered an issue live migrating a VM between 2 hosts with different CPUs and LibVirt throws the following error: libvirtError: unsupported configuration: guest and host CPU are not compatible: Host CPU does not provide required features:

On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 03:45:01PM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote: > Hi > > On a range of Dell servers containing Intel 64bit processors, 'virsh > capabilities' reports the cpu differently on Debian Wheezy-amd64 and > Wheezy-i386. The results given by the Wheezy-i386 version seem very > wrong (since n270 is an Atom processor). Apart from architecture, the > package

On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:47:03AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote: > > On 03/03/2014 10:44, Martin Kletzander wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:30:11AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote: > >> Hi Martin > >> > >> Thanks for your response. Here's the output of that grep: > >> > >> # grep ^flags /proc/cpuinfo | sort -u > >> flags

Hi, According to virsh capabilities I only have the following cpu features: <cpu> <arch>x86_64</arch> <model>IvyBridge-IBRS</model> <vendor>Intel</vendor> <microcode version='32'/> <topology sockets='1' cores='4' threads='1'/> <feature name='ds'/>

Hi I have Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 processor and I''m running dom0 on Gentoo 2.6.21 kernel. I also tried Gentoo 2.6.18-r12 kernel but in this two cases there was no vmx flag in: localhost ~ # grep vmx /proc/cpuinfo localhost ~ # grep flags /proc/cpuinfo flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 apic sep mtrr cmov pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx lm constant_tsc pni est

I am running a HP DL360 G3 ans want to know the optimal g729 module for it. There don't seem to be any optimised for Xeon's. I am currently using i686, but is there a better one to match my Xeon CPU's? [root@pbx ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 15 model : 2 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz stepping

On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 02:15:43PM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote: > > > On 03/03/2014 13:42, Martin Kletzander wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 11:15:51AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote: > >> On 03/03/2014 10:55, Martin Kletzander wrote: > >>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:47:03AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote: > >>>> On 03/03/2014 10:44, Martin

Hi Martin Thanks for your response. Here's the output of that grep: # grep ^flags /proc/cpuinfo | sort -u flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf eagerfpu pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor

On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 11:15:51AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote: > > On 03/03/2014 10:55, Martin Kletzander wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:47:03AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote: > >> On 03/03/2014 10:44, Martin Kletzander wrote: > >>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:30:11AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote: > >>>> Hi Martin > >>>> >

Hi On a range of Dell servers containing Intel 64bit processors, 'virsh capabilities' reports the cpu differently on Debian Wheezy-amd64 and Wheezy-i386. The results given by the Wheezy-i386 version seem very wrong (since n270 is an Atom processor). Apart from architecture, the package versions of libvirt-bin are identical: 1.2.1-1~bpo70+1. /usr/share/libvirt/cpu_map.xml files are

Hi. I have three Ubuntu Server 14.04 trusty with KVM. Two of them are HP servers and one is Dell. Both brands run fine the KVM virtual servers, and I can do live migration between the HPs. But I get I/O errors in the vda when I migrate to or from the Dell server. I have shared storage with NFS, mounted the same way in all of them: nfs.sever:/kvm /var/lib/libvirt/images nfs auto,vers=3 I

Hi, About half a year ago I installed a stock CentOS 6.0/64bit onto an Intel server to virtualize our Linux fileserver and four WinXP boxes with rdp each. Since recent times I didn't do any upgrades of the server's OS. Now I have CentOS 6.2. After an upgrade I noticed that all virtual cpu name changed to QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) The new features were 1) The ability to

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Now, this is not apparently very common to CentOS or EL server, but I need to hibernate one of myservers after a batch job daily. Current kernel appears to fail with pm-hibernate now. $ cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 6.8 (Final) $ uname -a Linux xxxx 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jul 12 18:30:56 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

I have problems to get Xen 3.0 working on my notebook (FSC AMILO Pro V3205). I already used different operating systems for the xen0 domain, like FC5, SUSE 10.1 und Debian SID (2.6.16-2-xen-smp) but i always run into the same trouble. When I try to start a xenU domain it always hangs and I get this: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- debian37:~# xm create

Hey my R buddies, I installed the "snow" and "rpvm" package on my Lenovo Thinkpad T400 today. The experiment below gave me a surprise. The time consumed by serial processing was several times larger than that taken by parallel processing. I'm very curious how this happened. Thank you very much. > library(snow) > > cc <- makePVMcluster(2) > > temp <-