similar to: chkrootkit and 4.10-prerelease issues?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "chkrootkit and 4.10-prerelease issues?"

2004 Aug 18
4
chfn, date, chsh INFECTED according to chkrootkit
I ran chkrootkit ( v. chkrootkit-0.43 ) earlier and noticed that chfn, date, and chsh showed as being infected. I remember reading post from the past that right now chkrootkit is giving alot of false positives, so I suspected that these 3 binaries are not bad. However, to be on the safe side, I deleted the 3 binaries, removed /usr/src and did a 'make world' to 4.10-STABLE. But, chfn,
2003 Aug 14
2
chkrootkit reports INFECTED :(
Hi! Running chkrootkit on newly installed FreeBSD 5.0 got: -cut- Checking `basename'... not infected Checking `biff'... not infected Checking `chfn'... INFECTED Checking `chsh'... INFECTED Checking `cron'... not infected Checking `date'... INFECTED -cut- Checking `ls'... INFECTED -cut- Checking `ps'... INFECTED Checking `pstree'... not found -cut- What does it
2003 Apr 13
1
chfn, chsh, ls, ps - INFECTED
My machine got hacked a few days ago through the samba bug. I reinstalled everything cvsuped src-all, and ran chkrootkit. No more LKM but still... Can anyone please advise ? bash-2.05b# chkrootkit | grep INFECTED Checking `chfn'... INFECTED Checking `chsh'... INFECTED Checking `date'... INFECTED Checking `ls'... INFECTED Checking `ps'... INFECTED -- Jay -------------- next
2004 May 21
12
Hacked or not ?
Hi, I have a 4.9-STABLE FreeBSD box apparently hacked! Yesterday I ran chkrootkit-0.41 and I don't like some of the outputs. Those are: chfn ... INFECTED chsh ... INFECTED date ... INFECTED ls ... INFECTED ps ... INFECTED But all the rest is NOT PROMISC, NOT INFECTED, NOTHING FOUND, NOTHING DELETED, or NOTHING DETECTED. I know by the FreeBSD-Security archives that
2003 Sep 10
1
chkrotkit 4.1 and FreeBSD 4.5
Hello! I've found that on two FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE boxes chkrootkit finds: Checking `chfn'... INFECTED Checking `chsh'... INFECTED Checking `date'... INFECTED Checking `ls'... INFECTED Checking `ps'... INFECTED recompiling, say, ls from souces didn't help. False positive or source changed as well? -- Alex.
2003 Oct 01
3
chkrootkit 0.42 & 4.7-REL... "[: -ne: argument expected".... huh?
Good morning all; Whils't running chkrootkit 0.42 on one of my 4.7-REL boxen it reported : <snip> Checking 'biff'...not infected ]: not found [: -ne: argument expected Checking 'chfn'...not infected ]: not found [: -ne: argument expected <snip> I've been unable to locate any information ref. the " ]: not found " and " [: -ne: argument
2003 Aug 24
2
[solution] chkrootkit reports infected files
Hey all, I've submitted a fix for chkrootkit port, to solve the false positives on FreeBSD 5 and higher: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=55919 The topic, btw, should be "Teach security/chkrootkit about FreeBSD 5", but it's not my first typo today. Maintainer, please approve. Authors, please see if you can include the changes. I also fixed a minor bug in chk_vdir.
2009 Dec 18
2
unverified files in 5.4
Hey, Gang! To ensure that a file hasn't been corrupted or tampered with, you can use rpm to verify the package it came from. Well, I found this: rpm -Vv util-linux .... ........ /usr/bin/cal S.?..... /usr/bin/chfn ........ /usr/bin/chrt S.?..... /usr/bin/chsh .... Does anyone else get this? And what would be the proper course of action at this point? Thanks mucho. --
2007 Nov 20
2
chkrootkit V. 0.47
Running freeBSD 6.1 After changing chkrootkit to the latest version V. 0.47 and compiling it then running it I get the following: ==================<SNIPPIT>================ Searching for anomalies in shell history files... nothing found Checking `asp'... not infected Checking `bindshell'... INFECTED (PORTS: 6667) Checking `lkm'... You have 131 process hidden for readdir
2003 Aug 24
2
weird problem with chkrootkit and checksums
Hello, last night, my chkrootkit crontab returned an alarm message : > Checking `lkm'... You have 1 process hidden for readdir command > You have 2 process hidden for ps command > Warning: Possible LKM Trojan installed Some research on google make me think it's probably a false positive. I tried few things : re-launching chkrootkit : "Checking `lkm'...
2006 Dec 22
1
chkrootkit reporting possible LKM trojan
How can I be sure if it is LKM or not? Today I've run chkrootkit and it gave me: Checking `lkm'... You have 179 process hidden for readdir command You have 179 process hidden for ps command chkproc: Warning: Possible LKM Trojan installed Checking `chkutmp'... The tty of the following user process(es) were not found in /var/run/utmp ! ! RUID PID TTY CMD ! root
2015 Feb 08
2
Did you get my previous email? Not Spam.
On 08/02/15 06:51, Jason Long wrote: > Thanks a lot. > > [root at printmah ~]# getent passwd jason > jason:*:11303:10513:jason JASON:/home/JASONDOMAIN/jason:/bin/false > > But I can't login to Linux via AD username and it show me : > > > > Last login: Sun Feb 8 01:48:32 2015 > Could not chdir to home directory /home/JASONDOMAIN/jason: No such file or directory
2005 Oct 28
0
chkrootkit 0.46 reboots FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p8
Hello, Please, don't use chkrootkit 0.46 on production machines. The "chkproc" process sends a SIGXFSZ (25) signal to init, that interprets this signal as a "disaster" and reboots after a 30s sleep. I'm contacting the chkrootkit maintainer to fix this problem. Sorry, Cordeiro
2018 Feb 21
1
are there reference lists/cheat sheets for categorized commands?
prepping to teach a 5-day CompTIA linux+ course next week with CompTIA-supplied courseware and, given that it was my choice, i chose to set up the classroom with centos 7.4 on all the student systems since i assume most students are there to learn sysadmin and that's the most likely platform they'll have when they get back to work. also, most students are taking this course to prep for the
2003 Nov 12
1
really clean install?
Good evening, I was finish the FreeBSD4.9 installation from CD, and only do some edit with the /etc/rc.firewall, /etc/rc.conf, /boot/defaults/loader.conf, and recompiling the kernel to support my ext2 backup harddisk, with sndcard support too. This's a old laptop (ibm380z), i have chkrootkit warning after all finished, i attached my uname -a, dmesg, pkg_info and chkrootkit result, please
2006 Feb 21
1
OT Proftpd Continued
Below is a cut and past from my log files that are sent to me. This is from the last day that proftpd worked correctly. I'm not sure why proftpd was restarted as the log states: ################### LogWatch 5.2.2 (06/23/04) #################### Processing Initiated: Sun Feb 19 09:02:02 2006 Date Range Processed: yesterday Detail Level of Output: 0 Logfiles
2015 Feb 09
2
Did you get my previous email? Not Spam.
On 09/02/15 06:29, Jason Long wrote: > Thanks. > I added the Two lines to "smb.conf" but I got below error : > > Could not chdir to home directory /home/jason: No such file or directory > mkdir: cannot create directory ?/home/jason?: Permission denied > -sh-4.2$ > > > About "PAM", I have not the file that you said : > > > [root at printmah
2001 Nov 07
1
winbind and pam files
In the winbind docs it says the following: "In /etc/pam.d/* replace the auth lines with something like this:" By this (/etc/pam.d/*) do they mean that we change ALL the files in that directory? If not, what files do we change? Another set of docs i read for winbind stated that i should change the /etc/pam.d/samba file, but on my TurboLinux 6.5 and RH 7.1 systems that file doesn't
2005 May 12
1
Do I have an infected init file?
Hello; I'm running a FreeBSD 4.10-release-p2 box and both chkrootkit 0.44 & 0.45 report that my /sbin/init file is infected. It appears as though the egrep for "UPX" in the output of "strings" triggers the infected notice. When I copy the init file from an uninfected box to this one chkrootkit continues to report it as infected. Is chkrootkit reading a copy of the
2009 Dec 18
3
Security advice, please
I run chkrootkit daily. For the first time I've got reports of a problem - Checking `bindshell'... INFECTED (PORTS: 1008) The page http://fatpenguinblog.com/scott-rippee/checking-bindshell-infected- ports-1008/ suggests that this might be a false positive, so I ran 'netstat - tanup' but unlike the report, it wasn't famd on the port. It was tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:1008