similar to: ls() with different defaults: Solution;

Dear useRs, I have a longitudinal experiment with several treatment groups, ~20 subjects per group, ~6 timepoints and a continuous dependent variable. I have been successfully been using lattice::xyplot with this data. However, I have been stumped with a particular application of it. I would like to use xyplot on my data, broken into treatment groups with the groups argument, using

Hi, I'm trying to replace function call with call to wrapper(function_name, num_args, ...), where varargs hold args of original call. Function* launch = Function::Create( TypeBuilder<int(const char*, int, ...), false>::get(context), GlobalValue::ExternalLinkage, "kernelgen_launch_", m2); { CallInst* call = dyn_cast<CallInst>(cast<Value>(I)); if

Hi Dimitry, This makes sense if you think about it from the perspective that the string you want passing must be passed at runtime, and so can't use a const char * from compile time. You need to make the string visible in the compiled image, and use that as the argument. A string is an array of 8-bit integers, so you need to create a ConstantArray. Value *v = ConstantArray::get(Context,

Dear all, I would like to log the calls to my functions. I am trying to do this using the function match.call(): fTest<-function(x) { theCall<-match.call() print(theCall) return(x) } > fTest(2) fTest(x = 2) [1] 2 I can see "theCall" printed into the console, but I don't manage to convert it into a character to write it into a log file

Dear R Community, One thing that always bugged me about R is the abundance of multi-level nested statements, like: cumsum(ifelse(c(1,diff(v)),1,0)) because: a) you have to read them inside out as opposed to left-to-right b) in the console you always have to go back and type the parenthesis if you want to nest your statement I kind of like the UNIX pipe operator as a very good abstraction of a

The most likely explanation is you have a new version of dplyr/tibble and an old version of rlang. Try re-installing rlang. Hadley On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Szumiloski, John <John.Szumiloski at bms.com> wrote: > UseRs, > > When doing some data manipulations using the tidyverse, I am repeatedly getting the same error message in now three separate situations. I can write up

Thanks for the feedback Jeff. Before I pursue a bug report, let me give a full example: ###### begin console output R version 3.4.1 (2017-06-30) -- "Single Candle" Copyright (C) 2017 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Platform: i386-w64-mingw32/i386 (32-bit) R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions.

This sounds an awful lot like a bug. Read the Posting Guide to know what to do about bugs. And delaying making the reprex is _always_ a bad idea. -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On August 14, 2017 7:26:32 AM PDT, "Szumiloski, John" <John.Szumiloski at bms.com> wrote: >UseRs, > >When doing some data manipulations using the tidyverse, I am repeatedly

This is almost certainly not an Asterisk-specific posting, but due to my inability to find a VoIP-focused Cisco list, I'll post here in the hopes of finding a more diverse user community. I am using a Cisco 7960 (version 6.0 SIP firmware) with Asterisk, and have been experiencing situations where the phone locks up. "Locks up" means that the bottom part of the screen

> On Aug 14, 2017, at 8:37 AM, Szumiloski, John <John.Szumiloski at bms.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the feedback Jeff. Before I pursue a bug report, let me give a full example: > > ###### begin console output > > R version 3.4.1 (2017-06-30) -- "Single Candle" > Copyright (C) 2017 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing > Platform:

Hi, as noone out there seems to be able to maintain chan_sccp, i'm trying to switch to chan_skinny. With the newest 1.4 svn the Softkeys are mostly wrong/non functional. I see Redial NewCall CFwdAll more (more) CFwdBu... GPickUp Confrn more NewCall works, CFwdAll seems to toggle DnD, the rest of the buttons do notting. Any ideas how to fix this? Regards, Andreas

Hello Group, I could use an advice on how SEXP handles work. My aim is to implement a system where I initially set a few global variables that are used for communication between C and R code. Then I do some work with R code and periodically call a function of my own that will update the system state. Such a design is useful for many purposes (for GUIs to name one). I am not entirely sure that R

UseRs, When doing some data manipulations using the tidyverse, I am repeatedly getting the same error message in now three separate situations. I can write up a reproducible example, but want to lay out the high-level issues in case someone recognizes exactly what is happening here. The error is: Error in mut_env_parent(overscope$.top_env, lexical_env) : object 'rlang_mut_env_parent'

Dear useRs, I am using the gamm function in the mgcv package to model a smooth relationship between a covariate and my dependent variable, while allowing for quantification of the subjectwise variability in the smooths. What I would like to do is to make subjectwise predictions for plotting purposes which account for the random smooth components of the fit. An example. (sessionInfo() is at

if i go off hook and dial 666 from an internal sipura spa-x000 (at extn 141), it rings straight through to extn 666. using the same dialplan, from a cisco 7960 with 7.1 sip code (at extn 142), i have to go off hook hit NewCall punch 142 (or any valid extn in the dialplan) hit Dial then dial 666 wtf? sip.conf for crisco [fiji] callerid="crisco" <142>

Yes it is. I'm remote at the moment so I can't send you the code but google for mobile remote receiver and you'll find what you are looking for. Lots of people do it so they don't have calls to cell phones picked up by voicemail. Cheers dean -----Original Message----- From: Pete Kay <petedao at gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 2:27 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing

Dear useRs, I have a utility function which is meant to be a clone of ls(), except with the option all.names=TRUE. Currently however, the function merely consists of a copy of the source code of ls(), except the default value of all.names is different. That approach has the drawback of future inconsistency if the code for ls() ever changes. No comment on whether that is likely or not; I would

On Tuesday 24 February 2009 22:19:27 Arnold Schwaighofer wrote: > What i was trying to say is that if you have > > i32 a() { > %1 = tailcall b() > ret %1 > } > > > i32 b() { > %1 = tailcall c() > ret %1 > } > > i32 c() { > %1 = tailcall d() > ret %1 > } > > i32 d() { > ret i32 5 > } > > only d() will actually

0, i32 %1) >> >> Note that if you have a series of sequential recursive tail calls this >> move will only performed once (at the bottom of the recursion, >> respectively when the recursion returns) so it's impact on performance >> should be minimal. > > Hmm, that makes it sound as though the moves between a tail call and the > following return are

Dear useRs, I have a complicated function to be optimized with optim(), and whose parameters are passed to another function within its evaluation. This function allows for the parameters to enter as arguments to various probability distribution functions. However, I am violating some scoping convention, as somewhere within the hierarchy of calls a variable is not visible. I will give a