similar to: ICPSR data archive to release datasets in R format

There are still some seats available in the workshop on R that John Fox will be teaching next week in Berkeley, CA. The workshop title is "The R Statistical Computing Environment: The Basics and Beyond." It will run from Monday, August 6 through Thursday, August 9 (9:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m. each day). This workshop is offered as part of the Inter-university Consortium for

Longitudinal and Multilevel Data in R and Stan ICPSR short course: May 28 to June 1, 2018 May 28: Introduction to R by John Fox May 29 to June 1: Longitudinal and Multilevel Data in R and Stan by Georges Monette Sponsored and organized by ICPSR, University of Michigan and held at York University in Toronto, Ontario Course description:https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/sumprog/courses/0226

Subject: Re: [R] Problems with R Commander version 1.8-3 Many thanks for your kindly replay. I just use a At this time I use an earlier version of the package. I try to install the Rcmdr from R-Forge. Many tanks again Message: 21 Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:04:09 -0400 From: "John Fox" <jfox at mcmaster.ca> To: <petretta at unina.it> Cc: r-help at r-project.org

Dear all, Sandy Weisberg and I would like to announce version 2.0-0 of the car package, now on CRAN. We've released this major revision of the package in anticipation of the publication of An R Companion to Applied Regression, Second Edition (Sage, in press), co-authored by us, which should be available before the end of the year. The new version of the car package has a number of new

Dear all, Sandy Weisberg and I would like to announce version 2.0-0 of the car package, now on CRAN. We've released this major revision of the package in anticipation of the publication of An R Companion to Applied Regression, Second Edition (Sage, in press), co-authored by us, which should be available before the end of the year. The new version of the car package has a number of new

Dear R users, Jarrett Byrnes and I would like to announce version 2.0-0 of the sem package for fitting observed- and latent-variable structural equation models. This is a general reworking of the original sem package (which is still available on R-Forge as package sem1). Some highlights of sem 2.0-0 include: o More convenient and compact model specification, including the default automatic

Dear R users, Jarrett Byrnes and I would like to announce version 2.0-0 of the sem package for fitting observed- and latent-variable structural equation models. This is a general reworking of the original sem package (which is still available on R-Forge as package sem1). Some highlights of sem 2.0-0 include: o More convenient and compact model specification, including the default automatic

Dear R users, I'd like to announce a new version, 1.8-1, of the Rcmdr package. The Rcmdr ("R Commander") package provides a basic-statistics graphical user interface (GUI) to R, implemented in Tcl/Tk via the standard R tcltk package. Beyond small changes and additions, the new version of the Rcmdr package uniformly implements a feature, first available in version 1.7-0, that

Dear R users, I'd like to announce a new version, 1.8-1, of the Rcmdr package. The Rcmdr ("R Commander") package provides a basic-statistics graphical user interface (GUI) to R, implemented in Tcl/Tk via the standard R tcltk package. Beyond small changes and additions, the new version of the Rcmdr package uniformly implements a feature, first available in version 1.7-0, that

Dear R users, Version 3.0-0 of the sem package is now on CRAN. From the package NEWS file: o Compiled code for optimization. o Added multi-group models. o Modification indices for equality-constrained parameters. o weights argument added to tsls(). o raw argument added to cfa(). Of these changes, the first two are the most significant, and the first -- the use of compiled code to

Dear r-devel list members, I've recently encountered the following problem using predict() with a model that has raw-polynomial terms. (Actually, I encountered the problem using model.frame(), but the source of the error is the same.) The problem is technical and concerns the design of poly(), which is why I'm sending this message to r-devel rather than r-help. To illustrate:

Dear R users, The OpenMx developer team takes great pride in announcing the availability of OpenMx 1.0. The team would like to express its gratitude to the large number of beta-testers who have helped us improve the code. Thank you. OpenMx is a free suite of R functions and a estimation back-end that supports fitting a wide variety of structural equation models including multiple groups, full

Dear R users, The OpenMx developer team takes great pride in announcing the availability of OpenMx 1.0. The team would like to express its gratitude to the large number of beta-testers who have helped us improve the code. Thank you. OpenMx is a free suite of R functions and a estimation back-end that supports fitting a wide variety of structural equation models including multiple groups, full

Dear R users, Version 2.1-1 of the sem package, for structural equation modeling, is now on CRAN. Unlike version 2.0-0, which was a major overhaul of the package, version 2.1-1 just sprinkles some syntactic sugar on it, introducing the specifyEquations() and cfa() functions; specifyEquations() supports model specification in equation (rather than path) format, and cfa() facilitates compact

Dear R users, Version 2.1-1 of the sem package, for structural equation modeling, is now on CRAN. Unlike version 2.0-0, which was a major overhaul of the package, version 2.1-1 just sprinkles some syntactic sugar on it, introducing the specifyEquations() and cfa() functions; specifyEquations() supports model specification in equation (rather than path) format, and cfa() facilitates compact

Dear R-devel list members, For several years, I've created a custom R installer for my students who use Windows. When I test the installer on my own Windows machines, selections in the installation dialogs reflect my previous choices, which I suppose are saved in the Windows registry. I'd like to be able to see what a student who has never installed R before will see, to verify that an

I am seeking advice. In your estimation, how difficult would it be to retrofit LLVM 3.2 with this body of improvements to instruction scheduling (and optionally, the loop vectorization as well). Would you have any suggestions for how best this might be achieved, i.e. the scope of the code required? Has anyone attempted this kind of retrofit? Thanks, Rick -------------- next part

Hi all, I've reviewed the mailing list archives and it looks like the "centos.org" AMIs in the marketplace are really official products of the centos project (whatever that means), but I wanted to ask explicitly to confirm. Presuming yes, I've run into an odd problem with the 6.4 x86_64 AMI (not updated). with a few packages, files are not being properly created in

Hi! I hope you don?t mind me posting this call for participation - I do think the matter at hand is very important for the people on this list, and the people on this list are very important for the matter at hand. For historical reasons, the native API provided by R for use by applications and packages is not as concise and consistent as is could be, and is tied into the internals of the

Hi, I have a SPSS datafile which is used for my textbook in the statistics (and which is available on http://abacon.com/fox/s6720p2.sav, but it is originally from ICPSR). When I opened it with SPSS 10 and run Frequencies on it I have got 979 valid data a 27 missing. However, see below (unfortunately, I have used R in preparation of my homework, which caused me an error on this): >