similar to: sshfs -o rellinks (module option) rejected by fuse

Alle, Does anyone know if there are any reputable repositories out there that contain packages for fuse/sshfs? Best Regards, Camron -- Camron W. Fox Hilo Office High Performance Computing Group Fujitsu America, INC. E-mail: cwfox at us.fujitsu.com

Hi A search of google failed to show any prebuilt rpms for sshfs and fuse. I do see that fuse support is in 2.6.14 kernel which isn't a whole lot of help. Before I dive headlong into this has anyone successfully built fuse/sshfs against Centos 4.4. If so would you share your experience? Thanks Daveh

Hello! I have samba share on my sshfs-mounted folder. All works just fine except I can't delete files from sshfs unless they are in 0777 chmodded directory. Even if that files were putted trough smbclient. I can read files, write files (regardless their directory permissions) but not delete them. Here is my share config: [myshare] comment = shre over sshfs path = /home/kli/work/remotes/dev

Hello, Renaming a file via sftp on an sshfs mount resulted in a failure with errorcode 38 (ENOSYS). This is reproducable with openssh release 4.9p1 & 5.1p1 in combination sshfs 2.2 (latest releases). Investigation revealed that sshfs only implements the rename()-call and not the link()-call (used by sftp-server). Attached is a patch to perform the rename()-call upon a failed link(). The

Hi all, I am trying to mount on boot a sshfs filesystem. I have tried this in /etc/fstab backup at myserver.com:/home/backup/myserver /backup fuse.sshfs nonempty,allow_other 0 2 but only works when network works. I have also tried this in my crontab: @reboot sshfs -o idmap=backup myserver.com:/home/backup/myserver /backup but doesn?t seem to work either. What else can I try?

> On Dec 3, 2007 5:19 AM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos at szeredi.hu> wrote: > > > Yes it is weird. I hope you can help me with this problem as sshfs is > > > so much simpler than nfs. > > > > Can you please do one more thing: start up sshfs normally, then on the > > server do a strace of the sftp-server process: > > > > strace -o /tmp/strace.log

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7424 Summary: -x with sshfs Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: bugs at dotcommie.net QAContact: rsync-qa at

Hi there I am wanting to call sshfs (auth via DSA keys) via a rsync pre-xfer bash script, and cannot get something right. If I run it from the cmdline line: env - sshfs usern@server:/share /dir/path -o -o IdentityFile=/tmp/id_dsa it mounts it just fine. (note the "env -" - I specifically tested with no environment to try to make the two situations identical). If I put that sole line

Hello, I'm trying to build a sshfs available environemnt. Info: [root at pandora /]# uname -a ; yum list \*fuse\* installed Linux pandora 2.6.18-8.1.6.el5xen #1 SMP Thu Jun 14 18:01:24 EDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Loading "priorities" plugin Loading "protectbase" plugin Loading "installonlyn" plugin Loading "fastestmirror" plugin Setting up

I mounted vpopmail/domains in sshfs. root at 192.168.239.205:/mnt/disk-b/domains on /mnt/domains type fuse.sshfs (rw,nos uid,nodev,max_read=65536,allow_other) I used qmail+dovecot+vpopmail+mysql dovecot-2.0.beta4. I mounted sshfs with vpopmail/domains directory. my /usr/local/etc/dovecot/conf.d/mail.conf file mmap_disable = yes dotlock_use_excl = yes mail_nfs_storage = yes

Hi, I created an LXC domain via libvirt (on Fedora 20), but when I'm trying to mount a FUSE filesystem, like sshfs, I'm getting a following error: $ sshfs 172.30.15.2:/<mntdir> /<mntpoint> fuse: device not found, try 'modprobe fuse' first I see that there's no /dev/fuse device. Is there a way to make it work? Can I get it working via libvirt domain xml file

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6077 Summary: rsync doesn't modify content of sshfs volumes Product: rsync Version: 3.0.2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1953 Bug #: 1953 Summary: Implementation of xattr in sftp-server for sshfs Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.9p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: patch Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1978 Bug #: 1978 Summary: ECDSA & SHA256 support in SSHFS DNS records Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.9p1 Platform: All URL: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-os-ietf-sshfp-ecdsa- sha2-07 OS/Version: All

Hi Devs and others, First, many thanks for 14+ years of personal usage rsync. I'm trying to rsync to an sshfs mount point instead of using ssh transport. The reason for this is that I'm using encfs to create files which land on the (untrusted) destination encrypted. After witnessing stalled rsync progress, a barely utilized internet connection and and idle CPU, I stripped this down

On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 1:36:03 AM CEST Warren Young wrote: > On May 18, 2020, at 5:13 AM, hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote: > > Is there a better alternative for mounting remote file systems over > > unreliable connections? > > I don?t have a good answer for you, because if you?d asked me without all > this backstory whether NFS or SSHFS is more tolerant of bad

Hello, all. I had a problem using Samba as a relay for SSHFS. I googled for the answer, but I couldn't find it. Then I found it on my own, so I figured that google could use this tip. ;) The problem seems to be with SSHFS. I've had trouble getting the mounts to be visible/accessible to normal user accounts. My solution? Run SSHFS as root, and create a Samba share with the force user

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1942 Bug #: 1942 Summary: mounting home directory with sshfs -o reconnect requires patch for ssh Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.8p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 05:36:03PM -0600, Warren Young wrote: > On May 18, 2020, at 5:13 AM, hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote: > > > > Is there a better alternative for mounting remote file systems > > over unreliable > > connections? > > I don?t have a good answer for you, because if you?d asked me > without all this backstory whether NFS or SSHFS is more

Hi, I have sshfs and ssh to my host setup to use the same socket with ControlMaster setting. Now when I try to scp a file to/from my host I see poor transfer speed. Also, a cp-ing a file to the mounted filesystem results in poor throughput. On the other hand, if I don't use the multiplexing, I get very good throughput. Now, my question is, when I multiplex, does the IPQoS get set wrongly for a