similar to: Problems with qemu img disks allocated in a nfs share

Hey guys, i just wanne report that our debian squeeze xen machines are also influenced by this bug, and we tried the workaround with the debug option by building our own linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64_2.6.32-31_amd64.deb but this isnt a workaround really, we tested it on an 40 vmachines dom0 and it just dont work, of course the lvm works but the machine is slow as hell and runs into several

HI all, I have created a snapshot for a kvm guest but only for one of disks assigned to it: qemu-img snapshot -c osvol_base /vmachines/vmtst/osvol.img and qemu-img snapshot shows me: Snapshot list: ID TAG VM SIZE DATE VM CLOCK 1 osvol_base 0 2013-08-29 11:37:23 00:00:00.000 It seems ok, but where is this snapshot stored??

Hi all, I have installed a CentOS 6.4 x86_64 host with official centos-xen packages. I am using virt-manager to create, remove, etc .. vmachines. All works really really well except automatic domains startup. Where libvirtd stores domains configurations?? Under /etc/libvirtd/qemu not, like it does when I use kvm instead of xen. Then, how can I automatic startup certain xen domains??

Hi Rowland, do you maybe have any idea what could potentially cause this bug? smbclient thrwos me back a mount error(5): Input/output error when I try to mount the remote smbFS. It doesn't happen with my MacOSx and Windows 7 as client but it happens with Linux OSs and with a Konica Minolta copy machine with a scanner to samba function. The first try to mount fails with the above error.

Hi Ive recently created a DomU machine, when I run the xm create -c command however the machine only boots to a certain point. Then stops....see below root@gangster:/etc/xen# xm create -c hudson Using config file "./hudson". Started domain hudson [ 0.000000] Linux version 2.6.22-14-xen (buildd@king) (gcc version 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease) (Ubuntu

Hi, I have a program which needs to call some code manually allocated in memory. The code is first prepared and all of its functions/variables are updated with the right address, then its init function is called through a simple __fastcall in C. It works very well under windows, but if i try to run it under wine it crashes when it calls this init function, with the following error:

I starting seeing this error quite frequently the past couple of days: $ rake routes ruby(38294,0x7fff70ee6ca0) malloc: *** error for object 0x100000000: pointer being freed was not allocated *** set a breakpoint in malloc_error_break to debug Abort trap Rails server crashes, some rake tasks crash, but not consistently. I have: - removed ruby 1.9.2-p180 and reinstalled (via rvm) - delete gemset

Hello list, sorry for my bad english anyway. if my message is delirium, just ignore this message. My question: When using mixed blocks, metadata and data chunks has be merge, but we have (when using mixed) speed penalty. how many penalty will be have if we using mixed? Kernel 3.11-rc7, Ubuntu 13.10 x64 my simple test: #Mixed sudo mkfs.btrfs -f -M /dev/sdb #sdb old seagate hdd 80G sudo mount

When I create a new VPS, I choose not to Allocated Disk space for the file-size. Now I need to make my VPS to allocated the file-space, is it possible? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/attachments/20100405/f8b10d03/attachment-0006.html>

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 Martin d'Anjou <point14 at magma.ca> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |point14 at magma.ca --- Comment #13 from Martin d'Anjou <point14 at magma.ca> 2008-12-13

the memory which is allocated by matchpathcon should be freed after it is useless Signed-off-by: Roy Li <rongqing.li at windriver.com> --- openbsd-compat/port-linux.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/openbsd-compat/port-linux.c +++ b/openbsd-compat/port-linux.c @@ -217,8 +217,10 @@ ssh_selinux_setfscreatecon(const char *p setfscreatecon(NULL);

Hi all, I have a bunch of new registers set up in X86RegisterInfo.td, the important part being def PR128 : RegisterClass<"X86", [i128], 128, (sequence "POI%u", 0, 7)>; def VR128 : RegisterClass<"X86", [v4f32, v2f64, v16i8, v8i16, v4i32, v2i64], 128, (add PR128, FR32)>; I have an entry in

When ttm_dma_tt_init() fails in nouveau_sgdma_create_ttm(), we should free the previously allocated memory before returning NULL. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> --- drm/nouveau_sgdma.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drm/nouveau_sgdma.c b/drm/nouveau_sgdma.c index 01707e7deaf5..e4fc494d688d 100644 --- a/drm/nouveau_sgdma.c

We get this patch every few months... How about one that instead adds a comment which explains why this kfree isn't needed :) [I'm leaving the reason to the reader, which will force you to glance at the ttm code.] On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> wrote: > When ttm_dma_tt_init() fails in nouveau_sgdma_create_ttm(), we should > free the

On 12/11/2014 03:47 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > We get this patch every few months... How about one that instead adds > a comment which explains why this kfree isn't needed :) [I'm leaving > the reason to the reader, which will force you to glance at the ttm > code.] ttm_dma_tt_init -> ttm_tt_destroy -> nouveau_sgdma_destroy -> kfree Urrk. I'm definitely not a fan

On Oct 6, 2007, at 6:11 PM, nkavv at physics.auth.gr wrote: >>> You mean a temporary defined in an instruction. OK, that is what i >>> basically >>> need here. Is it guaranteed to "live" in the physical register for >>> the entire >>> program (or at least for a single function, which would trivially >>> work for >>>

> > You are thinking about the gcc extension which allows the programer > to tie a register to global variable? This feature isn't implemented > nor am I aware of anyone driving to get it to implemented. Looks like > you will have to roll up your sleeves if that's what you want. :-) > > Evan Hi Evan is this the -fixed-reg<num> feature, or something that has

On Oct 4, 2007, at 10:40 PM, nkavv at physics.auth.gr wrote: > 2. Which are the new register allocation algorithms currently under > design? Do > they support preallocation of registers (it is different to > "fixing" a register > in GCC parlance)? > Hi Nikolaos, I have an alpha version of Chow & Hennesey's priority-based graph coloring algorithm.

Hi Ted, Doug said you might have a clang-based checker that would detect when people allocate memory with a BumpPtrAllocator and then construct a class into it that needs destruction. In killing valgrind-found memory leaks in LLVM, I've found several instances of this mistake. They often involve SmallVectors, which only show up as leaks in valgrind if they happen to overflow their static

I need to know how deep is the stack allocated for the process (total for all functions)? How to set this size? Yuri