similar to: CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 97, Issue 9

Greetings- Is there any updated news on the CentOS6 front? As per qaweb [1], today should be the day of QA signoff and syncing to internal mirrors. Are things still on track? --Tim [1] http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa

For those who don't follow the QA RSS, see: http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/node/120 to get the latest info on the status of 6.2. Looks good so far!

I just want to say that I really, really, appreciate the information given on this site: http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/calendar -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax:

In case you didn't see it, the initial CentOS 6 trees have been released to QA: http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/node/81 -- Paul Heinlein <> heinlein at madboa.com <> http://www.madboa.com/

Hi gang - Just took a look at http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/calendar/ I dont see anything on there for 6.1 Not trying to start flames and I know its ready when its ready and all that - but I was just surprised to see "nothing" on the calendar. jerry

Posted, in case you haven't seen it already: http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/node/116 Good news.

Jeff Sheltren has been providing timely and clear updates about the status of the 6.3 release: http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/ They're much appreciated! Thank you very, very much. -- Paul Heinlein heinlein at madboa.com 45?38' N, 122?6' W

Hello guys, we have done some progress on the new web site project. We need your comments for the design of the front page. We have 3 proposals or the design of the frontpage. Please look at them, we need your help :) http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/websitever2/ Best regards, Marian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type:

The QA web site at http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/blog was really helpful for those of us who were curious as to how CentOS 6.0 was coming along. However, there doesn't seem to be much information as to how CentOS 6.1 is going from either the QA web site, the forums (Announcements), or Kananbir's twitter feed -- but it may be I'm just not looking in the right place. Does the QA

Hi devs, If/when someone has a few minutes, could someone post an update on 6.1 on http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/blog ?. I suspect the devs have been busy with the just-released 5.7 version. :) -- Digimer E-Mail: digimer at alteeve.com Freenode handle: digimer Papers and Projects: http://alteeve.com Node Assassin: http://nodeassassin.org "At what point did we

Hi, I'm getting 100s of these errrors when a use the search function in thunderbird. Thunderbird seems to keep searching but shows no restults. Any ideas why? dovecot: Sep 30 14:12:04 Error: IMAP(jon): Trying to allocate 2217042872 bytes dovecot: Sep 30 14:12:04 Error: IMAP(jon): Raw backtrace: imap [0x80b705e] -> imap [0x80b6bab] -> imap [0x80bdbe3] -> imap [0x80b5b65] ->

Well, this is the most complicated part. I have Samba 4.2 AD DC with samba internal DNS and Server 2003 AD DC which should be decommisioned soon. Everything worked for several months. The odd part is that suddenly Server 2003 DNS lost all its zones and Samba 4.2 was the only reliably working DC. I seized FSMO roles after forcibly decomissioned Server 2003. I'm not sure that everything in my

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 8:29 PM David Greene via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> writes: > > > What is the practical plan to enforce the lack of merges? When we > > looked into this GitHub would not support this unless also forcing > > every change to go through a pull request (i.e. no pre-receive hooks >

Dear all, I recently started to see internal server errors when submitting perf results to lnt.llvm.org http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-before-vectorizer/builds/1154/steps/lnt.nightly-test/logs/stdio nt /home/grosser/buildslave/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-before-vectorizer/tests/nt/build/sample-0/report.simple.csv

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, We've decided to decomission the (old and unused) trac instance on projects.centos.org. We'll just redirect to git.centos.org instead (where all the fun happens). So, what to do with the http://wiki.centos.org/Projects page ? deleting it ? redireting to http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup (as now most of the things outside of

Hi, We have an old domain with a samba-3 PDC and LDAP backend in our HQ and two BDC in our branch offices. Since we don't use the domain in our HQ anymore and one of the branches will be moved to our new domain (2003/2008) I'm thinking about decomissioning the PDC and promote both BDCs as PDC for their branch offices and networks. I would also get rid of LDAP. Changing the backend to

Hi everybody! I''ve been trying with htb and tc filter. It seemed to work fine, but after testing with ethloop I''ve realized that traffic is not being distributed through the leaves as I thought. When sending packets to 1:10 and 1:11 at the same time, there''s no bandwidth sharing. There''s no traffic through 1:11 until traffic through 1:10 has finished. Though

libswfdec/swfdec_as_array.c | 2 - libswfdec/swfdec_as_array.h | 2 - libswfdec/swfdec_as_date.c | 2 - libswfdec/swfdec_as_date.h | 2 - libswfdec/swfdec_as_initialize.as | 1 libswfdec/swfdec_as_interpret.c | 1 libswfdec/swfdec_as_object.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- libswfdec/swfdec_filter.c

configure.ac | 1 vivified/Makefile.am | 2 vivified/core/vivi_application.c | 7 + vivified/dock/.gitignore | 12 ++ vivified/dock/Makefile.am | 15 +++ vivified/dock/vivi_docker.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++ vivified/dock/vivi_docker.h | 55 +++++++++++ vivified/dock/vivi_docklet.c | 172

configure.ac | 1 test/.gitignore | 19 -- test/Makefile.am | 40 ++++ test/compiler.c | 57 ++++++ test/swfdec_test.c | 156 +++++++++++++++++ test/swfdec_test_function.c | 67 +++++++ test/swfdec_test_function.h | 35 +++ test/swfdec_test_global.c | 40