similar to: BIND Setup Issue

Dear All With help from you all I am now at better stage. Special thanks to Robert. Atleast I am able to run all the required services (postfix, amavisd, clamd etc). I sent a mail from my gmail, I received at my newly setup domain/mailbox. I am facing issue while sending the mail outside. >From maillog I realized, two issues are there. *1. Virus scan failed. The error log is as below *

Dear All Recently I just setup postfix, dovecot, roundcube etc in a dedicated server. >From roundcuble, I am able to send mail to my gmail account. But from my gmail account, when sent mail to my mail id, that I setup recently, I do not see that email in roundcuble inbox. Neither that mail bounced back in gmail. Not sure, how do I debug this. Kindly let me know how should I proceed to fix

Hi Reindl, For me there lot of misunderstanding around DNS, especially when it comes to AD and a bit more when that AD is Samba AD. This thread just shows that once more time. I'm relatively new in DNS world and learnt a lot these last months, thanks to colleagues who are daily DNS admins and who accept to enlighten me a little bit. You claim to be a DNS admin and you said Rowland and you

We upgraded to NSD 3.2.9 (from 3.2.8) because we encountered the problem "Fix denial of existence response for empty non-terminal that looks like a NSEC3-only domain (but has data below it)." (a nasty problem with DNSSEC). But we now have IXFR issues. On one name server, NSD 3.2.9 works fine, zones are IXFRed and work. On another name server, with much more zones (and big ones), we

I am having a mail server problem where the mail to one domain is being sent to the wrong server. When I use "dig masonc.com mx", I get ;; ANSWER SECTION: masonc.com. 86400 IN MX 5 mail.masonc.com. ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: masonc.com. 86400 IN NS ns1.picadoo.com. masonc.com. 86400 IN NS ns2.picadoo.com. ;;

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1667 Summary: sshd slow connect with 'UseDNS yes' Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.2p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

Samba organizers might want to look into this: [ns1:~] dig 150.73.70.66.relays.osirusoft.com ; <<>> DiG 9.2.2 <<>> 150.73.70.66.relays.osirusoft.com ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 28005 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 13 ;; QUESTION SECTION:

Hello, sorry for beeing off-topic here. But can anyone confirm that there is a problem reverse resolving lists.digium.com (216.207.245.17) ? Because of this problem, my mail server will not accept mails from lists.digium.com (it is configured to accept valid DNS only). Armin

I'm a bit baffled by this and I'm looking for ideas... background: two DNS servers (ns1 & ns2)(64bit CentOS 5.8) one email server (64bit CentOS 5.8 & postfix 2.3.3) one nagios server (64bit CentOS 5.8 & nagios 3.3.1) situation: - all servers configured to use both DNS servers for lookups - ns1 server down for hardware problem - nagios alerts that smtp on email server taking

On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 19:35 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > I was also planning on adding some mirroring by adding 2+ A records to > some names: The mirroring setup is finished. There's a master server now handling dovecot.org and a mirror server handling www/hg/wiki. Would be nice to get another reliable fast mirror server if someone wants to donate one :) Requirements are: - Apache2

For the last few days I can not resolve voip-info.org from many DNS servers. It does resolve with some DNS servers but I suspect it may be related more to caching. Using the host command: host -a voip-info.org 130.179.16.23 Trying "voip-info.org" Using domain server: Name: 130.179.16.23 Address: 130.179.16.23#53 Aliases: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR,

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hey, I am trying to get spf working and it just doesn't want to take. On my Tiny/DJB server it was easy. Anyway here is my entry. $ORIGIN net. itadmins 14400 IN SOA ns1.itadmins.net. hostmaster.itadmins.net. ( 2012102201 16384 2048 1048576 2560 ) 14400 IN A 178.15.51.221 14400 IN

I have a DNS server which is not returning mx queries for some reason? The zone file is as follows: $TTL 1H @ IN SOA example.com. root.example.com. ( 1 ; serial# 3H ; refresh 1H ; retry

Hi all If I do a "dig mydomain.co.za" from a Linux server, how do I know which DNS nameserver returns the queries? I seem to have a faulty DNS server, but can't see which one, so I want to find out which nameserver (if there's 4 - ns1.myserver, ns2.myserver, ns3.myserver & ns4.myserver) returns the queries? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers CEO, SoftDux Web:

I'm not sure why this started, but apparently I'm having a DNS problem. Yesterday mail started bouncing with this error: 450 Unable to find obrien-pifer.com I think the messages eventually get delivered, but not sure. I guess I'll see if this one makes the list. I checked my domain using http://www.checkdns.net/ and it gives me a couple warnings. One is that there's no MX

Hi all, I see centos 3.5Beta in the beta.centos.org. Is this the next release of version 3 ? Strangely, 3.4 is not the final release of version 3 ? Thx Ceg Ryan

------------ Original Message ------------ > Date: Saturday, July 01, 2017 10:57:42 +0100 > From: Pete Biggs <pete at biggs.org.uk> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Physically moving a mail server vs. cached DNS > > On Sat, 2017-07-01 at 11:37 +0200, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >> Le 01/07/2017 ? 11:00, Pete Biggs a ?crit : >> > That is controlled by the TTL (time to live)

Hello everyone - I run bind version 9.8.2 on CentOS 6.5. The daily logwatch run sends me the following items. Are any of these a real problem? ============ checkhints: extra NS 'A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: extra NS 'B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: extra NS 'C.ROOT-SERVERS.NET' in hints: 170 Time(s)

2016-04-04 14:20 GMT+02:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > On 04/04/16 10:23, mathias dufresne wrote: > >> SOA means "this DNS se'rver can modify the zone". >> > > No it doesn't, it stands for 'Start Of Authority' and contains who to > contact for the domain records. > Rowland... thank you again Captain Obvious. Yes SOA means

Hi David, Michael, Stefan, I'm restarting to work on this topic since Kata guys are interested to have that, especially on the guest side. While working on the v2 I had few doubts, and I'd like to have your suggestions: 1. netns assigned to the device inside the guest Currently I assigned this device to 'init_net'. Maybe it is better if we allow the user to decide which